Analysis of the microsurgery fellowship match: 2019-2022 update.

BACKGROUND: A recent analysis of microsurgery fellowship match data published in 2019 demonstrated increased competition for available positions. With growing opportunities in the field, the authors hypothesize that the landscape for both applicants and programs has become more competitive. The aim of this study is to compare two periods of match data to inform residents and programs in microsurgery. METHODS: Microsurgery fellowship match data was obtained from the San Francisco Match with approval by the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery for the years 2014-2022. Data were stratified into the categories of 2016-2018 and 2019-2022. Parameters assessed included: program and position fill rates, match rates, and in-service examination percentiles. Data were analyzed using Pearson's Chi-square tests and unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: The median number of participating programs and positions increased to 29 and 47 in 2019-2022, compared with 23 and 40 in 2016-2018. This coincided with a decrease in the number of applicants per position (1.3 [52-40] vs. 1.1 [50-47], p = .45). There was a significant increase in the match rate between groups (67.8% vs. 80.2%, p = .007). Recently, 2022 saw the lowest position fill rate on record, at 75.4% (40 of 53 positions filled), down from 85.3% (35 of 41) in 2018 (p = .35) and 95.6% (43 of 45) in 2019 (p = .006). Mean in-service examination percentiles for successfully matched applicants did not differ between (2016-2018) and (2019-2022) applicants. CONCLUSION: Recent years have seen a rise in the number of microsurgery fellowship training programs with a decline in the number of applicants. Accordingly, there has been an increased match rate for prospective applicants. Despite this, a pool of unmatched applicants and unfilled positions with training opportunities still remain. The reasons for which are likely multifactorial.

Free flap reconstruction of elbow soft tissue defects: Lessons learned from 15 years of experience.

BACKGROUND: The elbow is a complex joint that is vital for proper function of the upper extremity. Reconstruction of soft tissue defects over the joint space remains challenging, and outcomes following free tissue transfer remain underreported in the literature. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the rate of limb salvage, joint function, and clinical complications following microvascular free flap coverage of the elbow. METHODS: This retrospective case series utilized surgical logs of the senior authors (Stephen J Kovach and L Scott Levin) to identify patients who underwent microvascular free flap elbow reconstruction between January 2007 and December 2021. Patient demographics and medical history were collected from the medical chart. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the type of flap procedure performed. The achievement of definitive soft tissue coverage, joint function, and limb salvage status at 1 year was determined from postoperative visit notes. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (14 male, 7 female, median age 43) underwent free tissue transfer for coverage of soft tissue defects of the elbow. The most common indication for free tissue transfer was traumatic elbow fracture with soft tissue loss (n = 12, [57%]). Among the 21 free flaps performed, 71% (n = 15) were anterolateral thigh flaps, 14% (n = 3) were latissimus dorsi flaps, and 5% (n = 1) were transverse rectus abdominis flaps. The mean flap size was 107.5 cm2. Flap success was 100% (n = 21). The following postoperative wound complications were reported: surgical site infection (n = 1, [5%]); partial dehiscence (n = 5, [24%]); seroma (n = 2, [10%]); donor-site hematoma (n = 1, [5%]); and delayed wound healing (n = 5, [24%]). At 1 year, all 21 patients achieved limb salvage and definitive soft tissue coverage. Of the 17 patients with functional data available, 47% (n = 8) had regained at least 120 degrees of elbow flexion/extension. All patients had greater than 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Microvascular free flap reconstruction is a safe and effective method of providing definitive soft tissue coverage of elbow defects, as evidenced by high rates of limb salvage and functional recovery following reconstruction.

Exploring Factors Associated with Implant Removal Satisfaction in Breast Implant Illness Patients: A PRO BREAST-Q Study.

Background: Breast implant illness (BII) is a poorly understood heterogeneous disorder treated with implant removal; however, patient-reported symptoms and outcomes after treatment remain unclear. Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral breast implant removal related to BII by two surgeons at an academic medical center between 2018 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were surveyed using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction model with the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery BII survey extension. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for patient-associated factors. Results: Forty-seven patients were surveyed with a response rate of 51% (n = 24). Of the 20 patients who completed the survey, the majority were White (85%), with 45% (n = 9) having a documented history of psychiatric illness. Six (30%) patients had capsular contracture and four (20%) had documented implant rupture. Most implant removal procedures (n = 12, 60%) were not covered by insurance. Fourteen (70%) patients reported a net improvement in their symptoms after implant removal, most commonly chest discomfort, muscle pain, fever, and headaches. Capsular contracture was predictive of reduced psychosocial, sexual, and breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.015). Self-pay was predictive of increased breast satisfaction scores (P = 0.009), but had no impact on symptomatic improvement. A reduced time to implant removal was predictive of fewer residual symptoms (P = 0.032). Psychiatric illness had no significant impact on the outcomes. Conclusions: In the setting of suspected or diagnosed BII, a reduced time to implant removal may decrease the risk of residual symptoms and improve overall patient satisfaction. In patients with capsular contracture, preoperative counseling should emphasize that implant removal may only improve physical symptoms.