International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for gastric cancer (2019).

At present, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) has attracted more and more attention worldwide, because of its great advantages including minimal cutaneous trauma and post-operative pain, fast post-operative recovery, short hospital stay, and positive psychological impact. However, NOSES for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) is still in its infancy, and there is great potential to improve its theoretical system and clinical practice. Especially, several key points including oncological outcomes, bacteriological concerns, indication selection, and standardized surgical procedures are raised with this innovative technique. Therefore, it is necessary to achieve an international consensus to regulate the implementation of GC-NOSES, which is of great significance for healthy and orderly development of NOSES worldwide.

International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.

In recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the treatment of colorectal cancer has attracted widespread attention. The potential benefits of NOSES including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesic, faster recovery of bowel function, shorter length of hospital stay, better cosmetic and psychological effect have been described in colorectal surgery. Despite significant decrease in surgical trauma of NOSES have been observed, the potential pitfalls of this technique have been demonstrated. Particularly, several issues including bacteriological concerns, oncological outcomes and patient selection are raised with this new technique. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to reach a consensus as an industry guideline to standardize the implementation of NOSES in colorectal surgery. After three rounds of discussion by all members of the International Alliance of NOSES, the consensus is finally completed, which is also of great significance to the long-term progress of NOSES worldwide.

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with natural orifice specimen extraction.

AIM: To introduce transvaginal or transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery to avoid an abdominal incision. METHODS: Between January 2009 and December 2011, 21 patients with rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic radical resection and the specimen was retrieved by two different ways: transvaginal or transanal rectal removal. Transvaginal specimen extraction approach was strictly limited to elderly post-menopausal women who need hysterectomy. Patients aged between 30 and 80 years, with a body mass index of less than 30 kg/m², underwent elective surgery. The surgical technique and the outcomes related to the specimen extraction, such as duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and the complications were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Laparoscopic resection using a natural orifice removal approach was successful in all of the 21 patients. Median operating time was 185 min (range, 122-260 min) and the estimated blood loss was 48 mL. The mean length of hospital stay was 7.5 d (range, 2-11 d). One patient developed postoperative ileus and had an extended hospital stay. The patient complained of minimal pain. There were no postoperative complications or surgery-associated death. The mean size of the lesion was 2.8 cm (range, 1.8-6.0 cm), and the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 18.7 (range, 8-27). At a mean follow-up of 20.6 mo (range, 10-37 mo), there were no functional disorders associated with the transvaginal and transanal specimen extraction. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal or transanal extraction in L-TME is a safe and effective procedure. Natural orifice specimen extraction can avoid the abdominal wall incision and its potential complications.

Laparoscopic radical resection of low rectal carcinoma integrating transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a case report.

A male patient with lower-segment rectal carcinoma underwent laparoscopic radical resection and regional lymph node dissection. The extracorporeal rectoanal anastomosis was completed using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) without requiring any additional abdominal incision. The pathological examination identified a clean margin. At the postoperative 6-month visit, the patient exhibited generally normal defecation, urination, and sexual function, but no sign of local recurrence or distant metastasis. TEMS integrating laparoscopy is a surgically and oncologically feasible, effective, and safe procedure for lower anterior resection.