Drug survival and clinical effectiveness of secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab for psoriasis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Biologics targeting IL-23 and IL-17 show efficacy and safety in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate drug survival in patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a comparative evaluation of the achievement of PASI 90 and PASI ≤ 3 at 16, 28, and 52 weeks along with a DS (drug survival) analysis with IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, risankizumab, tildrakizumab, and guselkumab on 1,057 patients. RESULTS: IL-17 inhibitors showed a faster achievement of PASI 90 and PASI ≤ 3 with significant superiority over IL-23 inhibitors at week 16 (p < 0.001; 56% vs. 42% and 70% vs. 59%, respectively). A difference was shown in favor of IL-23 inhibitors regarding DS (p < 0.001), which was 88% at 24 months vs. 75% for IL-17 inhibitors. In multivariate analysis, IL-23 inhibitors (HR 0.54 CI 0.37-0.78, p = 0.001), and male sex (HR 0.57 CI 0.42-0.76, p < 0.001) were all associated with a lower probability of drug interruption. Risankizumab (HR 0.42 CI 0.26-0.69, p = 0.001), guselkumab (HR 0.49 CI 0.24-0.99, p = 0.046), and male sex (HR 0.57 CI 0.43-0.77, p < 0.001) were associated with a lower probability of drug interruption than secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: IL-23 inhibitors showed the best performance on DS. Overall, the most effective class was IL-17 inhibitors considering the short-term effectiveness, but long-term effectiveness is in favor of anti-IL-23.

Risankizumab shows high efficacy and maintenance in improvement of response until week 52.

Risankizumab has been recently approved for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, real-life studies are scarce. Analysis of possible predictor factors of treatment response are limited to body mass index (BMI) and previous biologic experience. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Risankizumab and to investigate on possible predictor factors response. We retrospectively analyzed 166 patients from two centers in Italy who undergone Risankizumab for psoriasis. The proportion of patients achieving a 100%, 90%, 75% of improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and PASI <3 were collected at weeks 16, 28, 40, and 52. Study population was analyzed in subgroups to investigate possible predictors of response to Risankizumab since week 40. At the time of analysis 165, 103, 30, and 11 patients had completed 16, 28, 40, and 52 weeks of treatment, respectively. The mean PASI score decreased from 12.5 ± 5.1 at baseline to 1.9 ± 2.4 at week 16. Similar reductions were observed when considering PASI <3, PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100. Previous biologics failure, different smoking habits, obesity, and joint involvement resulted in a lower response to risankizumab. In particular, significant differences in mean PASI at any time-points was observed between psoriatic arthritis (PSA) and non-PSA patients: 2.7 versus 1.7 (p = 0.036), 1.9 versus 0.4 (p = 0.006), and 4.1 versus 0.5 (p = 0.016) at 16, 28, and 40 weeks, respectively. No difference in response to risankizumab occurred in the case of involvement of difficult-to-treat areas. In this population, Risankizumab was effective and safe. Smoking habits, joint involvement, obese status, and previous biologic experience may negatively affect treatment response, while difficult body sites involvement have minor impact.

Clinical characteristics and response to biological therapies for inverse psoriasis: a real-life comparison between the therapeutic effects of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 agents.

BACKGROUND: Inverse psoriasis (IP) is a variant of plaque psoriasis involving flexor surfaces. A clear definition of IP is still lacking. Therapy is based on topical and systemic treatments, including classic systemic drugs and biologic agents, but a well-defined therapeutic strategy is absent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the general characteristics of patients with IP or vulgar psoriasis and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 or anti-interleukin-23 agents in the same groups. Second, treatment effectiveness and the demographic characteristics of IP patients treated with IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors were also compared. IP patients were included if they had specific psoriatic involvement of the axillary, inguinal, or submammary lines, breast folds, antecubital and popliteal pits, intergluteal fold, and perianal area. Patients with vulgar plaque psoriasis and concomitant intertriginous involvement were included in the vulgar psoriasis cohort. RESULTS: Patients with IP were prevalently female and treated with IL-17 inhibitors compared to those with vulgar psoriasis. They also had a greater risk of drug discontinuation and subsequent therapeutical switch (32.1% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.002). At later time points, those with IP showed progressively slower achievement of PASI100 and 90 compared to the cohort with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, there was greater joint involvement in patients treated with an anti-IL-17 agent (P = 0.011), who also had a lower median age of onset (P = 0.011) compared to patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent. Patients with IP treated with an anti-IL-23 agent initiated with a lower mean PASI and showed a slower response than patients on an anti-IL-17 agent. At later time points, progressively greater effectiveness of IL-23 inhibitors was observed compared to IL-17 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IP responded less to biologic agents than those with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, IL-17 inhibitors had a faster onset than IL-23 inhibitors, but long-term anti-IL-23 agents seem to be associated with better outcomes.