The Ratio of Height to Thyromental Distance (RHTMD) and Height to Sternomental Distance (RHSMD) as the Predictive Tests for Difficult Tracheal Intubation.

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative evaluation is a cornerstone in identifying patients with a risk of difficulty in intubation. Thyromental distance (TMD) is the most commonly used predictor of difficult intubation. However, it's not a reliable indicator of difficulty during intubation because it differs with patients' body & size proportion. The present study was done for the evaluation of the ratio of height to thyromental distance (RHTMD) and ratio of height to sternomental distance (RHSMD) as difficult airway predictors.  Methods: Data was taken from 400 consecutive patients posted for the need for anesthesia with intubation during surgery. Preoperatively examination of RHTMD and RHSMD was done. Difficulty during intubation has been explained in this current study with Cormack and Lehane grade 3 or 4. The positive and negative predictive values, as well as sensitivity and specificity of individual tests, were calculated as per the recognized formula. RESULTS: The study enrolled 400 patients, which include a maximum number of participants (138 [34.5%]) from the 41-50 year age group. On analyzing RHTMD and RHSMD, the former was found to have a better predictive value than RHSMD (p=0.001). RHTMD & RHSMD was found to have 62.5% & 37.50% sensitivity, respectively. RHTMD was found to have better specificity, positive & negative predictive values, and accuracy than RHSMD. CONCLUSION: RHTMD was observed to have superior precision in anticipating difficulty in intubation compared to RHSMD.

Comparison of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy Using Miller and McCoy Blade.

BACKGROUND: The most commonly used equipment to aid endotracheal intubation is a laryngoscope, and the procedure performed is known as laryngoscopy, which leads to profound cardiovascular effects. The process of laryngoscopy causes the release of catecholamines, thereby leading to marked pressor responses and tachycardia. The process of laryngoscopy can be made easier by the use of various types of laryngoscopic blades. The McCoy blade is a modification of the standard Macintosh blade that incorporates a hinged tip blade. It allows elevation of the epiglottis while decreasing overall laryngeal movement. A Miller blade is a straight blade with a slight upward curve near the tip. It is found that the force exerted, head extension, and cervical spine movement are less with the Miller blade. This study was undertaken to compare changes in haemodynamic parameters before, during, and after laryngoscopy using these two blades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following institutional ethical committee approval and obtaining informed written consent, 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades I and II in the age group of 18-45 years of either sex undergoing elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 50 patients each. Group Mc - laryngoscopy was performed using a no. 3 McCoy blade. Group Ml - laryngoscopy was performed using a no. 2 Miller blade. The laryngoscopic view was compared using Cormack and Lehane grading. Haemodynamic parameters before, during, and after laryngoscopy were recorded. RESULTS: Hemodynamic parameters including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were increased in both the groups but were statistically and clinically significant in the Miller group with p≤0.001. CONCLUSION: McCoy blade is associated with a significantly more stable hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy in comparison with the Miller blade.

Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the Combined Early Warning Scoring Systems in the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality.

Introduction Deterioration of clinical condition of in-hospital patients further leads to intensive care unit (ICU) transfer or death which can be reduced by the use of prediction tools. The early warning scoring (EWS) system is a prediction tool used in monitoring medical patients in hospitals, hospital staying length, and inpatient mortality. The present study evaluated four different EWS systems for the prediction of patient survival. Method The present prospective observational study has analyzed 217 patients visiting the emergency department from November 2016 to November 2018, followed by demographic and clinical data collection. Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), Triage Early Warning Score (TEWS), Leed's Early Warning Score (LEWS), and patient-at-risk scores (PARS) were assigned based upon body temperature, consciousness level, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, mobility, etc. Data was analyzed with the help of R 4.0.4 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington). Results Out of these 217 patients, 205 got shifted to a ward, and 12 died, amongst which the majority belonged to the 31-40 age group. Among patients admitted to ICU had a MEWS greater than 3, TEWS within the range 0 to 2 and 3 to 5, LEWS greater than 7, and PARS greater than 5 on the initial days of admission. The patients who died and those who were shifted to the ward showed significant differences in EWS. A significant association was observed between all the EWS and patient outcomes (p<0.001). Conclusion MEWS, TEWS, LEWS, and PARS were effective in the prediction of inpatient mortality as well as admission to the ICU. With the increase in the EWS, there was an increase in the duration of ICU stay and a decrease in chances of survival.