A new compression system for treatment of venous leg ulcers: a prospective, single-arm, clinical trial (FREEDOM).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of a new multicomponent compression system in one bandage for the local treatment of patients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs). METHOD: This was an international, prospective, non-comparative, clinical trial, conducted in France and Germany. Eligible participants had a VLU with a wound area of 2-20cm2, lasting for a maximum of 24 months. For a period of 6 weeks, patients were treated with a new multicomponent compression system in one bandage which was worn day and night, providing high working pressure and moderate resting pressure (UrgoK1). Clinical assessments, wound measurement and photographs were planned at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 6. The primary endpoint was the relative wound area reduction (RWAR) after 6 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included wound closure rate, oedema resolution, change in patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), acceptability, adherence to the compression therapy, local tolerance, and physician's overall satisfaction with the evaluated compression system. RESULTS: A cohort of 52 patients (52% female, mean age 75.4±13.0 years) with VLUs, including oedema in 58% of cases, were recruited from 22 centres. At baseline, 42 patients had already been treated with a different compression system. VLUs had been present for 5.6±4.9 months and had a mean area of 5.7±4.3cm2. After 6 weeks of treatment, a median RWAR of 91% (interquartile range: 39.4; 100.0) was achieved. Wound closure was reported in 35% of patients. A RWAR ≥40% at week 4, predictive of wound healing at 12 weeks, was achieved in 62% of patients. At the final visit, oedema present at baseline was resolved in 57% of patients. Substantial improvements in the HRQoL of the patients were reported with a decrease of the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions. Comfort in wearing the evaluated system was reported as 'very good' or 'good' by 79% of patients, resulting in a high patient adherence to compression therapy. Compared to previous compression systems, half of the patients reported more ease in wearing shoes, and greater satisfaction and comfort with this new system. Nine non-serious adverse events related to the device or its procedure occurred in seven patients. At the final visit, the majority of the physicians were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with the new compression system overall. CONCLUSION: The new multicomponent compression system in one bandage has been shown to promote rapid healing of VLUs, reduce oedema, improve HRQoL and to be well tolerated and accepted. It appears to be a viable alternative to existing compression systems.

Evaluation of TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibres in exuding leg ulcers: two multicentric, single-arm, prospective, open-label clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a new TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibres in the management of exuding leg ulcers, at the different stages of healing. METHOD: This work presents the results of two prospective, multicentric clinical studies: NEREIDES and CASSIOPEE. Patients with a non-infected, moderate-to-strongly exudating leg ulcer of venous or mixed origin, were treated with the dressing and an appropriate compression system for 12 weeks. The wounds included in NEREIDES had to be in debridement stage, and those in CASSIOPEE at granulation stage. In both studies, the primary outcome was the relative wound area reduction (RWAR) at week 12. Main secondary outcomes included healing rate, time-to-reach wound closure, adverse events and acceptability of the dressing by patients and health professionals. RESULTS: There were 37 patients included in NEREIDES and 51 in CASSIOPEE. The two cohorts presented similar patient and wound characteristics, except from the percentage of sloughy tissue on wound bed at baseline (median: 75% NEREIDES and 30% CASSIOPEE). At week 12, the RWAR (60% NEREIDES and 81% CASSIOPEE), wound closure rates (18% NEREIDES and 20% CASSIOPEE) and mean times-to-reach wound closure (58±27 days NEREIDES and 55±23 days CASSIOPEE) supported the beneficial outcomes of the treatment in both cohorts. In patients with a wound duration ≤6 months, the wound area reduction reached 85% in NEREIDES and 81% in CASSIOPEE, highlighting the importance to initiate adequate treatment as soon as possible. The nature and frequency of the local adverse events were similar in both studies and consistent with the good safety profiles of the poly-absorbent fibres and of the TLC-NOSF dressings. The acceptability of the dressing (easy to apply, conformable and non-adherent to the wound bed at removal, with no pain or bleeding at removal) has been judged 'very good' or 'good' at each stage of the healing process, by both nursing staff and patients. CONCLUSION: These clinical results establish the new TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibres (UrgoStart Plus, Laboratoires Urgo) as an effective, safe and simple treatment for the local management of leg ulcers, at the different stages of healing and until wound closure.

Cavity wounds management: a multicentre pilot study.

The objective of this study was to assess acceptability (based on pain at removal), efficacy and tolerance of an absorbent and cohesive rope(UrgoClean Rope, Laboratoires Urgo) in the local management of deep cavity wounds. This study was a prospective, multicentre (13), non comparative clinical study. Patients presenting with an acute or chronic non-infected cavity wound were followed up for four weeks and assessed weekly with a physical examination, in addition to volumetric,planimetric and photographic evaluations. Pain at removal was the primary criterion, assessed on a Visual Analogic Scale. The percentage of the wound surface area reduction and volumetric reduction were considered as secondary efficacy criteria. Forty three patients were included in this study. After one week of treatment dressing removal was painless and continued to be so throughout the period of the trial(four weeks). Median surface area at baseline was 7.74 cm2 and was reduced by 54.5% at week 4 (relative area reduction). Median wound volumetric value was noted 12 ml at baseline and was reduced by 72.7% by the end of treatment. The cohesiveness of the new rope was considered very good by health professionals. No residue was observed on the wound bed during the dressing change with the new rope. There were no adverse events related to the tested rope, during this trial.Pain-free removal associated with good efficacy and tolerance were observed with this new cohesive rope in the healing process of deep cavity wounds and could represent a therapeutic alternative to the usual ropes used in such indications.

Metastatic breast cancer: overall survival related to successive chemotherapies. What do we gain after the third line?

This retrospective study analyzed, in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), overall survival (OS) related to each subsequent line of chemotherapy (CT). We evaluated 578 patients with a MBC. Among these patients, 558 patients were stratified according to the number of different CT lines received. Median OS decreased from 22.5 to 12.3 months. Nevertheless, survival was rather stable for subsequent lines after the third line of CT around 8 months. In our study, it appeared useful to give several CT lines when possible. Subsequent lines of CT could have a beneficial effect on the survival for some patients with MBC.

Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in combination with letrozole in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women. Endocrine therapy has been used for more than a century to treat advanced-stage breast cancer. The results obtained with the third-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole demonstrated an actual improvement in patient outcome compared with tamoxifen. This benefit translates into disease-free survival improvement for adjuvant treatment and overall survival in patients with metastatic disease. The present clinical situation of hormonal therapy is stable; however, recently, new anticancer agents (temsirolimus and everolimus) that inhibit mammalian target of rapamycin protein kinase have been developed and seem to be very promising because of their synergistic activity with letrozole. The phase II study of a combination of temsirolimus or everolimus with letrozole demonstrated a better progression-free survival in the combination arm than in the letrozole alone arm. Consequently, the results of ongoing phase III studies are eagerly awaited.

[Methionine dependency of cancer cells: a new therapeutic approach?]. / Dépendance en méthionine des cellules cancéreuses: une nouvelle approche thérapeutique?

Metabolic abnormalities of tumor cells offer opportunities of therapeutic targeting. In contrast to normal cells, tumor cells have absolute requirement for methionine (Met), an essential amino acid. Many molecular mechanisms have been considered to explain Met dependency. Several approaches have been used To reduce Met in vivo. As the main Met source was food, synthetic Met free diet were widely used. Alternatively, Met restriction was archived by the use of Met analogs or enzymatic degradation by methioninase. In animal models, Met restriction permit to limit tumor growth and to reduce tumor volume. However, interruption of Met restriction induce the regrowth of tumor. Moreover Met restriction induce several cells modifications suggesting its use in association with conventional chemotherapy. Preclinical studies have shown synergistic effect of the association of Met restriction and different cytostatic agents. Currently, few clinical investigations have been realised to test this therapeutic strategy.

A new prognostic classification after primary chemotherapy for breast cancer: residual disease in breast and nodes (RDBN).

PURPOSE: Several factors have been shown to correlate with prognosis of patients with breast carcinoma. Among the most useful are node involvement, tumor size, and pathologic grade. These factors retained their prognostic value when assessed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Previously we used a revised Nottingham prognostic index and defined 3 related indices (breast grading index, modified Nottingham prognostic index, and modified breast grading index) that were also significantly related to overall survival and disease-free survival. To assess the postchemotherapy risk globally, we have combined the 3 pathologic factors to design a specific classification to evaluate residual disease. This new classification includes 4 risk levels (levels 1-4) according to residual disease magnitude after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in 710 patients with operable breast cancer. RESULTS: This classification resulted in significantly different results for overall survival (P < 10(-7)) and disease-free survival (P = 8.3 x 10(-7)). CONCLUSION: This classification should help us in the selection of subgroups of patients for further adjuvant treatment.

Changes in and prognostic value of hormone receptor status in a series of operable breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to detect and analyze changes in hormone receptor (HR) status after treatment of operable breast cancer with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). Patients were treated from 1982 to 2004 with different NCT combinations, mainly in successive prospective phase II trials. HR status before and after NCT was retested and reviewed in a blinded fashion by two pathologists, for 420 patients from a database of 710 patients. Among these 420 tumors, 145 (35%) were HR negative and 275 (65%) were HR positive before NCT. The HR status had changed after treatment in 98 patients (23%): 61 patients (42%) initially HR negative became HR positive. This HR-positive switch was significantly correlated with better overall survival (OS), compared with patients with unchanged HR-negative tumors. Moreover, this HR-positive switch also had an effect on disease-free survival (DFS). Conversely, 37 patients (13%) initially HR positive became HR negative after NCT. However, this group of previously positive patients still had a survival advantage for OS, but not for DFS. The Allred score was evaluated before and after chemotherapy. An increase in Allred score after NCT was significantly correlated with better DFS but not OS. It was previously shown, for other tumor parameters, that residual disease after NCT, rather than parameters evaluated on the initial biopsy, must be considered for patient prognosis. In this work, NCT induced variations in HR status in 23% of patients. A positive switch in HR status after NCT could be an indicator of better prognosis for patient outcome.