Is radical surgery always curative in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors? A cure model survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant therapy after curative surgery for sporadic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) is not currently recommended, assuming that all patients could be cured by a radical resection. The aim of our study is to establish how many and which kind of patients remained uncured after radical resection of pNET. METHODS: Retrospective study involving 143 resected sporadic pNETs. The survival analysis was carried out using the cure model, describing the cure fraction and the excess of risk recurrence. Multivariate analyses were made in order to evaluate the non negligible effect of demographics, clinical and pathological factors on survival parameters. The results were reported as percentages, fractions, ORs and HRs with 95% confidence interval (95 CI %). RESULTS: The cure fraction and the excess of hazard rate of the whole population were 57.1% (37.4-74.6, 95% CI) and 0.06 (0.03-0.07, 95% CI), respectively. Two independent factors were related to the cure fraction: TNM stage (OR 0.27 ±â€¯0.17; P = 0.002) and grading (OR 0.11 ±â€¯0.18; P = 0.004). Considering the excess of hazard rate, only two independent factors were related to an increased risk of recurrence: TNM stage (HR 3.49 ±â€¯1.12; P = 0.004) and grading (HR 4.93 ±â€¯1.82; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The radical surgery has a high probability of cure in stages I-II or in grading 1 while, in stages III-IV or in grading 3 tumors, surgery alone failed to achieve a "cure". A multimodal treatment should be employed in order to avoid a recurrence of the disease.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: which factors are related to open conversion? Lessons learned from 68 consecutive procedures in a high-volume pancreatic center.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy represents a difficult surgical procedure with an high conversion rate to open procedure. The factors related to its difficulty and conversion to open distal pancreatectomy were rarely reported. The aim of the present study was to identify which factors are related to conversion from laparoscopic to open distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database of 68 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was conducted at a high-volume center by pancreatic surgeons experienced with laparoscopic surgery. Pre-intra and postoperative data were collected. Patients who completed a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were compared with those who needed a conversion to the open approach as regard demographic, clinical, radiological, and surgical data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Univariate analysis suggested that the site of the lesion, the extension of pancreatic resection, and the requirement for an extended procedure to adjacent organs were significantly associated with the risk of conversion to the open approach. Multivariate analysis showed that only the extension of the pancreatic resection (subtotal pancreatectomy) was significantly related to the odds of conversion [odds ratio (OR) 19.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-32.3; P = 0.038]. Preoperative suspicion of malignancy differed between the two groups; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the study, only the extension of pancreatic resection seemed to be the main factor related to conversion during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: What is the Best "Choice"? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Non-randomized Comparative Studies.

BACKGROUND: Many mini-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD) techniques have been reported, but their advantages with respect to an open technique (OPD) and with respect to each other are unclear. METHOD: A systematic literature search of studies comparing different types of MIPD was carried out: laparoscopic-assisted (LAPD), totally robotic (TRPD), totally laparoscopic (TLPD) or totally laparoscopic-robotic assisted (TLPD-RA) to OPD. The primary endpoint was postoperative mortality. The secondary endpoints were intraoperative, postoperative and oncological outcomes. A network meta-analysis was designed to generate direct, indirect and mixed estimate effects, between different approaches, for each variable. The effects were reported as pairwise comparisons and hierarchical ranking as to each approach could be the best or the worst for each outcome, expressed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. RESULTS: Twenty studies were identified, involving 2759 patients: 1813 OPDs, 81 LAPDs, 505 TRPDs, 224 TLPDs and 136 TLPD-RAs. No differences regarding postoperative mortality were found in pairwise comparison. The LAPD technique had a high probability of being the worst approach, while TRPD had a high probability of being one of the best. Regarding the secondary endpoints, OPD was the best regarding operative time and postoperative bleeding, but the worst regarding blood loss and wound infection. The TRPD or TLPD-RA techniques seemed to be the best for delayed gastric emptying, length of hospital stay, harvested lymph nodes and postoperative morbidity. The TLPD technique was often the worst approach, especially for overall and major complications, postoperative bleeding and biliary leak. CONCLUSION: The safest MIPDs are those involving a robotic system which seems to have a promising role in ameliorating the outcomes of OPD, especially when compared to a laparoscopic approach.

Sporadic Small (≤20 mm) Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm: is the Risk of Malignancy Negligible When Adopting a More Conservative Strategy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The management of small (≤20 mm), nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) remains under debate. The European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society guidelines advocate the possibility of a conservative approach. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all studies comparing the risk of malignancy in small pNENs with respect to large ones (>20 mm). Malignancy was defined based on the presence of nodal metastases. Distant metastases, tumor grading (G2-3), vascular microscopic invasion, stage III-IV, and overall and disease-free survival also were evaluated. The data were reported in two ways: using the risk difference (RD) and the likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH). RESULTS: The search identified only 6 eligible studies with an overall population of 1697 resected pNENs: 382 (22.5%) small and 1315 (77.5%) large. The RD of lymph nodal metastases was -0.26 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.31 to -0.22; P < 0.001). The LHH was 0.34, suggesting that the risk of leaving a malignancy during follow-up due to the adoption of a conservative strategy was three times higher than the benefits. The risk difference of distant metastases, G3 lesions, G2-G3 lesions, stage III/IV, microscopic vascular invasion, death, and recurrence of the disease were lower in small NF-PNETs than large ones. The related LHH values suggested that a watch-and-wait policy never provided a benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Even if the malignancy rate in sporadic, small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms was lower than in large ones, this difference did not justify a watch-and-wait policy.

Is pancreaticogastrostomy safer than pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy? A meta-regression analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinically relevant POPF rate between Pancreatogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). To evaluate the confounding factors affecting meta-analytic results. METHODS: A systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing PG to PJ with an International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat or harm (NNT and NNH) were used. Fixed and random-effect models were applied. Impact of confounding covariates on the meta-analytic results was evaluated using meta-regression analysis, reporting ß coefficient ± standard error (SE). RESULTS: Seven RCTs were identified involving 1184 patients: 603 PG and 581 PJ. RD in the fixed model of clinically relevant POPFs suggested that PG was superior to PJ (RD-0.07; 95% CI: -0.11 to -0.03) with an NNT of 14 (95% CI: 9 to 33). In random model, PG was not superior to PJ (RD-0.06; 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.01) with an NNT of 17 and a possibility of harm in some cases (NNH = 100). Meta-regression suggested that the increase in the proportion of "soft pancreas" in the PG arm corresponded to a more positive value of RD (ß = 0.47 ± 0.19; P value: 0.045 ± 0.003). CONCLUSION: A PG could be slightly superior to PJ in the prevention of clinically relevant POPF. The presence of high risk pancreatic remnant remains the main limitation of PG.

Is surgery the best treatment for sporadic small (≤2 cm) non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours? A single centre experience.

BACKGOUND: There is currently there is substantial controversy regarding the best management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm. METHODS: Retrospective study involving 102 surgically treated patients affected by non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Patients having small tumours (≤2 cm) (Group A) and those having large tumours (>2 cm) (Group B) were compared regarding demographics, clinical and pathological factors with the aim of evaluating the risk of malignancy and survival times. RESULTS: The small tumours were T3-4 in 11% and G2-3 in 36.6% of cases; lymph node and distant metastases were present in 31% and 8% of the cases, respectively. When small and large tumours were compared, significant differences were found in relation to the presence of symptoms (P = 0.012), tumour status (P > 0.001), grading (P > 0.001) and years lost due to disability (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis of the factors predicting malignancy and survival times showed that tumour size was related only to grading (P < 0.001). The years of life lost and disability adjusted life years were influenced by age at of diagnosis, the presence of symptoms and years lost due to disability only by grading. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour size alone did not seem to be reliable in predicting malignancy because, first, small tumours (≤2 cm) could present lymph node or distant metastases, and could be G2-3 in a non-negligible percentage of cases and second, their risk of malignancy and survival time are similar to large tumours. Additional parameters have to be considered in order to establish the proper management of small tumours, such as age at diagnosis, presence of symptoms and grading.

A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

PURPOSE: Two main techniques are commonly used during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in order to perform the ileocolic anastomosis: intracorporeal (IA) and extracorporeal (EA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the two techniques. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out to identify studies comparing IA and EA. The primary endpoint was anastomotic leakage. The secondary endpoints were intra- and postoperative results. A meta-analysis was carried out using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen studies matched the selection criteria, enrolling 1717 patients (50.3 % IA, 49.7 % EA). The anastomotic leakage was similar in the IA and the EA groups (3.4 vs. 4.6 %, respectively) with a risk difference (RD) of -0.01 (95 % CI = -0.03 to 0.01; P = 0.120). IA group had lower overall complication rate (27.6 vs. 38.4 %; RD = -0.15; 95 % CI = 0.27 to -0.04; P = 0.009) and wound infection rate (4.9 vs. 8.9 %; RD = 0.52; -0.03; 95 % CI = -0.06 to -0.01; P = 0.030). Time to first oral intake (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1; 95 % CI = -1.59 to -0.41; P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (WMD = -1.13; 95 % CI = -1.90 to -0.35; P = 0.004) and minilaparotomy size (WMD = -26; 95 % CI = -38 to -13; P < 0.001) were shorter in IA patients. The incisional hernia rate was lower in the IA group (2.3 vs. 13.7 %) with an RD of -0.09 (95 % CI = -0.17 to -0.02; P = 0.020). There were no differences in operative time, blood loss, conversion, internal hernia, reoperation, mortality, time to first flatus and defecation, analgesic required, number of lymph nodes harvested and length of distal margin. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with IA is a safe alternative to EA. Additional well-structured, prospective randomised trials are needed to confirm all the advantages regarding postoperative results which were pointed out in our study.

Validation of the 2010 WHO classification and a new prognostic proposal: A single centre retrospective study of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

BACKGOUND: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) modified the classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Recently, some modifications were proposed to improve its prognostic value. The aim of this study was to test the prognostic value of both the original and the modified 2010 WHO grading systems. METHODS: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients surgically resected for well-differentiated NETs were evaluated in multivariate Cox regression models. Age, sex, hormonal status, size, lymph node ratio, stage, margin status and grading were evaluated in order to predict disease-free survival (DFS). Four models were evaluated: model 1: grading according to the 2010 WHO; model 2: modified grading with cut-off at 5% of the Ki-67 index; model 3: modified grading in which the G2 category was divided into two subgroups (2-5% and 5-20%) and model 4: the Ki-67 index as a continuous variable. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was carried out to evaluate the clinical utility of the various cut-offs. RESULTS: All the grading systems remained independent factors in predicting DFS. Model 2 (c index = 0.814 and P = 0.012) and model 3 (c index = 0.865 and P = 0.015) showed higher predictive powers with respect to model 1 (c index = 0.799). Model 4 had a high predictive value (c index 0.848, P = 0.013). Decision curve analysis confirmed that biological behaviour represented the best prognostic parameter. CONCLUSION: This study presented some limitations: single centre, retrospective design and a long period of enrolment. The result showed that, by increasing the cut-off of the G2 category to 5% or by creating two subgroups in the G2 category, it was possible to obtain a better stratification of patients.

A comprehensive analysis on expected years of life lost due to pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer represents a fatal malignancy leading to premature death and loss of life expectancy. The aim of the present study was to assess how many years of life are lost due to this cancer, in relationship with surgery and ageing. METHODS: Data from 716 consecutive patients discharged from a tertiary referral hospital (2002-2012) with a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and with complete clinical and follow-up data were used to estimate the number of years of life-lost (YLL) through a semi-parametric extrapolation having an age-, sex- and year-of-onset- matched population derived from national life tables as reference. RESULTS: The mean entire lifespan estimated for the 716 patients was 1.4 years (95% C.I.:0.8-1.9) resulting in a number of YLL after diagnosis of 12 years (95% C.I.:11.5-12.6) per person. Surgical patients (147 cases; 20.5%) were younger and experienced higher post-diagnostic lifespan (3.5 years) than non-surgical older individuals (0.8 years; p < 0.001). These figures were reflected on the number of expected YLL (EYLL) that remained substantially unaffected by surgery (p = 0.821). Patients aged ≤68 years experienced the highest number of EYLL (20.8 years); whereas elderly patients had a loss of life that corresponded to only 6% of the entire life they had already lived. CONCLUSIONS: In a typical pancreatic cancer cohort, surgery was not able to modify population-based statistics because of a different age at tumor onset which nullifies any benefit from a "lifespan from birth" perspective. Pancreatic cancer in younger individuals must be ranked within the very first causes of EYLL due to malignancy.

Portal/Superior Mesenteric Vein Reconstruction during Pancreatic Resection Using a Cryopreserved Arterial Homograft.

BACKGROUND: Portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection during pancreatic resection has been widely applied in clinical practice. METHODS: From a prospective data base of pancreatic resections, patients undergoing PV/SMV resection and reconstruction with a cryopreserved arterial homograft were extracted with the aim of evaluating the safety, feasibility and reproducibility of the procedure. Data regarding patient demographics, preoperative staging, surgery, histopathology and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Five patients were extracted in the last year. Indications for this technique were type IV-V degree of vein involvement and a 3.5 cm median length of vein infiltration. Median operative and clamping times were satisfactory (385 and 27 min, respectively), postoperative outcomes were good and there was no graft infection, thrombosis or stenosis occurred postoperatively and during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The use of a cryopreserved arterial homograft for PV/SMV reconstruction after pancreatic resection seems to be a feasible, safe and easily reproducible surgical technique in high-volume specialized centers and can be added to the pool of surgical solutions in selected patients.

Are there preoperative factors related to a "soft pancreas" and are they predictive of pancreatic fistulas after pancreatic resection?

PURPOSE: Soft pancreatic parenchyma is the most widely recognized risk factor for pancreatic fistula. We conducted this study to clarify if there are preoperative factors related to a soft pancreatic remnant and to establish if they are useful for predicting pancreatic fistula. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pancreatic resections at the Department of Surgical Sciences of the S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. The factors considered were sex, age, co-morbidities, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, characteristics of the pancreatic remnant, and preoperative diagnosis. RESULTS: Data from 208 patients were recorded. The risk factors predictive of a soft pancreatic remnant were BMI >24 kg/m(2) (P = 0.011), a Wirsung duct size ≤3 mm (P < 0.001), and coexisting periampullary diseases (P < 0.001). Using these factors, we developed a risk score model that was validated by considering the pancreatic fistula rate. The overall and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate increased with increasing score values (P = 0.002 and P = 0.028, respectively). Using a score cut-off value of six points, patients with a score ≥6 were considered to be at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: Body mass index >24 kg/m(2), a Wirsung duct size <3 mm, and preoperative diagnosis represented the preoperative factors related to a soft pancreas. These factors proved useful in the building of a risk score model to predict the incidence of pancreatic fistula.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: what factors are related to the learning curve?

PURPOSE: The factors related to the learning curve for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy have rarely been evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective study of 32 patients who underwent a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy performed at a high-volume center by a single pancreatic surgeon experienced with laparoscopic surgery was conducted. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were collected. The primary endpoint was the length of the operation. The secondary endpoints were the conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, the length of hospital stay and rate of unplanned splenectomy. RESULTS: The length of the operation and the cumulative sum of the procedures presented a logarithmic correlation (P = 0.048). The learning curve appeared to have been completed after 17 procedures (P = 0.040). The multivariate analysis confirmed that the completion of the learning curve (CLC) reduced the length of the operation by 18 % (P = 0.009), but extended resection increased the length of the operation (P = 0.023). The conversion and reoperation rates, overall postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and length of the hospital stay were not related to the CLC. Unplanned splenectomy was more frequently performed during the first 17 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the operation seems to be the main factor related to the CLC for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The learning curve could be considered to be completed after about 17 procedures if performed by surgeons experienced with laparoscopic techniques at high-volume centers.

WHO 2010 classification of pancreatic endocrine tumors. is the new always better than the old?

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the World Health Organization released a new classification system for endocrine pancreatic tumors. The new categories replaced those in the old classification. METHODS: To test the safety and accuracy of the new classification in stratifying patients, we retrospectively evaluated 64 consecutive patients, surgically R0 resected for pancreatic endocrine tumors. RESULTS: In our experience, only 19/31 (61.3%) patients classified as having well-differentiated tumors were included in the new neuroendocrine tumor G1 category while the remaining 12 (38.7%) shifted into the G2 category. Moreover, 10/33 (30.3%) patients classified as affected by a malignant endocrine neoplasm in the old system were considered as G1 tumors in the new one. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001) and changed the risk category in 22 (33.3%) patients with well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine tumors. Multiple multivariate models were produced and the poor stratification of the new system was found to be in the G2 category which presents too wide a range of the Ki 67 index (2 to 20%). We built a model in which the G2 category was divided into two subcategories: tumors with a Ki 67 index ≥2 and <5% and tumors with a Ki index ≥5 and <20%, partially modifying the new classification. In this model, the modified classification showed a superiority with respect to the European Neuroendocrine tumor Society-Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system in stratifying patients for recurrence, with a relative risk of 19 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The new G2 category seems too large because it includes both benign, low and high grade malignant tumors.

Interventional radiology procedures after pancreatic resections for pancreatic and periampullary diseases.

CONTEXT: The use of interventional radiology has increased as the first-line management of complications after pancreatic resections. METHODS: Patients in whom interventional radiology was performed were compared with those in whom interventional radiology was not performed as regards type of pancreatic resection, diagnosis, postoperative mortality and morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, bile leakage, reoperation rate and length of hospital stay. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of interventional radiology in the treatment of complications after pancreatic resection. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-two (62.8%) out of 290 patients experienced postoperative complications. Interventional radiology procedures were performed in 37 cases (20.3%): percutaneous drainage in 28, transhepatic biliary drainage in 8 and arterial embolisation in 3 cases. Technical success was obtained in all cases and clinical success in 75.7%. Reoperation was avoided in 86.5%. In patients with major complications, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and bile leaks as well as those with late postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (P=0.030) and patients with postpancreatectomy haemorrhage grade C (P=0.029), interventional radiology was used (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.009, respectively) significantly more frequently than in the remaining patients. The reoperation and mortality rates were similar in the two groups (P=0.885 and P=0.100, respectively) while patients treated with interventional radiology procedures had a significant longer length of hospital stay than those in the non-interventional radiology group (37.5 ± 23.4 vs. 18.7 ± 11.7 days; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiology procedures were useful, especially for patients with postoperative pancreatic fistulas and bile leaks in whom reoperation was very often avoided.

The usefulness of a multidisciplinary team approach in decision making for pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms.

CONTEXT: Serous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are regarded as benign entities with rare malignant potential and are frequently resected. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach in decision making regarding the diagnosis and management of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms. METHODS: A retrospective study of a prospective database involving 43 patients with serous cystic neoplasms was carried out. Patients who underwent multidisciplinary team evaluation (Group 1) were compared with patients who did not (Group 2) as regards demographic, clinical, radiological, surgical and pathological data. Uni-multivariate analyses were carried out. RESULTS: Uni-multivariate analysis showed that a multidisciplinary team approach was significantly related to the type of management, suggesting that MDT evaluation independently reduced the odds of surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02-0.8; P=0.027). Age, second level imaging techniques, latero-lateral diameter, cranio-caudal diameter and Wirsung duct size differed between the two groups; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary team approach seems to be useful in proper decision making regarding the diagnosis and management of pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms.

Natural history of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a case report.

CONTEXT: The natural history of incidental branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas is still unknown. CASE REPORT: The case of a 74-year-old man who had been diagnosed 14 years previously with an incidental branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreatic head, 30 mm in size, without mural nodules and dilatation of the main pancreatic duct is herein reported. After an exploratory laparotomy at the time of diagnosis (when he was 60 year-old), the patient was enrolled in a surveillance program. Fourteen years after the diagnosis, the cystic lesion showed an increase in size, Wirsung duct dilatation and the presence of several mural nodules. A total pancreatectomy was performed and a diagnosis of mixed-intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm diffused throughout the entire pancreas with high grade dysplasia, and a micro-invasive carcinoma (<1 mm) of the pancreatic head was reached. CONCLUSION: The present case confirmed that the natural history of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms is unpredictable. Thus, an appropriate surveillance program is required for prompt identification of the signs predictive of a malignant transformation of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. In high-volume centers, surgery should seriously be considered in young patients who are fit for surgery.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in Italy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) increased in the past twenty years but the real diffusion of this technique is still unknown as well as the type of centers (high or low volume) in which this procedure is more frequently performed. DATA SOURCE: A systematic review was performed to evaluate the frequency of LDP in Italy and to compare indications and results in high volume centers (HVCs) and in low volume centers (LVCs). RESULTS: From 95 potentially relevant citations identified, only 5 studies were included. A total of 125 subjects were analyzed, of whom 95 (76.0%) were from HVCs and 30 (24.0%) from LVCs. The mean number of LDPs performed per year was 6.5. The mean number of patients who underwent LDP per year was 8.8 in HVCs and 3.0 in LVCs (P<0.001). The most frequent lesions operated on in HVCs were cystic tumors (62.1%, P<0.001) while, in LVCs, solid neoplasms (76.7%, P<0.001). In HVCs, malignant neoplasms were treated with LDP less frequently than in LVCs (17.9% vs 50.0%, P<0.001). Splenectomy was performed for non-oncologic reason frequenter in HVCs than in LVCs (70.2% vs 25.0%, P=0.004). The length of stay was shorter in HVCs than in LVCs (7.5 vs 11.3, P<0.001). No differences were found regarding age, gender, ductal adenocarcinoma treated, operative time, conversion, morbidity, postoperative pancreatic fistula, reoperation and margin status. CONCLUSIONS: LDPs were frequently performed in Italy. The "HVC approach" is characterized by a careful selection of patients undergoing LDP. The "LVC approach" is based on the hypothesis that LDPs are equivalent both in short-term and long-term results to laparotomic approach. These data are not conclusive and they point out the need for a national register of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

The role of lymph node ratio in recurrence after curative surgery for pancreatic endocrine tumours.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of lymph nodes metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is unclear. METHODS: Retrospective study of 53 patients who underwent a curative standard resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. The endpoint was to define the role of the lymph nodes ratio in recurrence after curative surgery. The following data were considered as possible factors for predicting the risk of recurrence: gender, age, presence of symptoms, hormonal status, site of tumours, type of resection, size of the tumours, radical resection, pathological T, N and M stage, the Ki67 index, the number of lymph nodes harvested, the number of metastatic lymph nodes and the lymph node ratio. Recurrence rate and time of recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve (26.4%) patients developed a recurrence with a median time of 42.8 (1-305) months. At multivariate analysis, the only factors related to recurrence were: size of lesions (HR 1.1, C.I. 95% 1.0-1.1, P = 0.011), Ki67 ≥ 5% (HR 3.6, C.I. 95% 1.3-10, P = 0.014) and LNR > 0.07 (HR 5.2, C.I. 95% 1.1-25, P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that the lymph nodes ratio played an important role in the recurrence rate and suggested that a low number of metastatic lymph nodes reduced the disease free survival.

Frailty assessment can predict textbook outcomes in senior adults after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery.

AIM: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery can be associated with suboptimal outcomes in older patients. The aim was to identify the correlation between frailty and surgical variables with the achievement of Textbook Outcome (TO), a composite measure of the ideal postoperative course, by older patients with CRC. METHOD: All consecutive patients ≥70years who underwent elective CRC-surgery between January 2017 and November 2021 were analyzed from a prospective database. To obtain a TO, all the following must be achieved: 90-day survival, Clavien-Dindo (CD) < 3, no reintervention, no readmission, no discharge to rehabilitation facility, no changes in the living situation and length of stay (LOS) ≤5days/≤14days for colon and rectal surgery respectively. Frailty and surgical variables were related to the achievement of TO. RESULTS: Four-hundred-twenty-one consecutive patients had surgery (97.7% minimally invasive), 24.9% for rectal cancer, median age 80 years (range 70-92), median LOS of 4 days (range 1-96). Overall, 288/421 patients (68.4%) achieved a TO. CD 3-4 complications rate was 6.4%, 90-day mortality rate was 2.9%. At univariate analysis, frailty and surgical variables (ileostomy creation, p = 0.045) were related to. However, multivariate analysis showed that only frailty measures such as flemish Triage Risk Screening Tool≥2 (OR 1.97, 95%CI: 1.23-3.16; p = 0.005); Charlson Index>6 (OR 1.61, 95%CI: 1.03-2.51; p = 0.036) or Timed-Up-and-Go>20 s (OR 2.06, 95%CI: 1.01-4.19; p = 0.048) independently predicted an increased risk of not achieving a TO. CONCLUSION: The association between frailty and comprehensive surgical outcomes offers objective data for guiding family counseling, managing expectations and discussing the possible loss of independence with patients and caregivers.

5 year oncological outcomes of the HIGHLOW randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: The oncological outcomes of low ligation (LL) compared to high ligation (HL) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during low-anterior rectal resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision are still debated. The aim of this study is to report the 5 year oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic LAR with either HL vs. LL of the IMA MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2014 and December 2016, patients who underwent elective laparoscopic LAR + TME in 6 Italian non-academic hospitals were randomized to HL or LL of IMA after meeting the inclusion criteria (HighLow trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02153801). We analyzed the rate of local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and disease-free survival at 5 years of patients previously enrolled. RESULTS: Five-year follow up data were available for 196 patients. Recurrence happened in 42 (21.4%) of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the distant recurrence rate (15.8% HL vs. 18.9% LL; P = 0.970) and pelvic recurrence rate (4,9% HL vs 3,2% LL; P = 0.843). No statistically significant difference was found in 5-year OS (p = 0.545), DSS (p = 0.732) or DFS (p = 0.985) between HL and LL. Low vs medium and upper rectum site of tumor, conversion rate, Clavien-Dindo post-operative grade ≥3 complications and tumor stage were found statistically significantly associated to poor oncological outcomes in univariate analysis; in multivariate analysis, however, only conversion rate and stage 3 cancer were found to be independent risk factors for poor DFS at 5 years. CONCLUSION: We confirmed the results found in the previous 3-year survival analysis, the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation does not affect OS, DSS and DFS at 5-year follow-up.