Conservative Treatment for Metatarsus Adductus, A Systematic Review of Literature.

There are various treatment approaches for the subjects with metatarsus adductus, including nonsurgical and surgical treatment. Nonsurgical treatments such as serial casting, modified shoes (Bebax shoe, Ipos antiadductus shoe) and orthoses (Wheaton brace, counter rotation system splint, Denis Brown bar, and Fillauer bar) are widely used in this regard. The main question posted here is which orthoses are more effective in correcting metatarsus adductus. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine the efficiency of various nonsurgical treatments used for metatarsus adductus. MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Cochrane Data base of systematic review (CDSR), Scopus and ISI Web of knowledge (from 1960 to 2021) were searched by predefined search strategies to screen eligible randomized controlled studies meeting established criteria. The quality of the studies was assessed based on Down and Black tool. 200 studies on this topic were reviewed and finally 11 studies which met the inclusion criteria were selected for final analysis. These studies evaluated the efficiency of nonsurgical treatment options on foot angle and deformity correction in the subjects with metatarsus adductus. Quality of the papers based on Downs and Black tool varied between 13 and 23. Some treatments such as Wheaton brace, rigid strap, exercise (manipulation), reverse last shoe and plaster cast are used for these subjects. Although good correction can be achieved with use of these treatment methods, some of them have complications which should be considered in this regard. It seems that Wheaton brace and Bebax shoe have fewer complications compared to other methods.

Investigation of joint contact forces during walking in the subjects with toe in gait due to increasing in femoral head anteversion angle.

Toe-in gait is a pathology in which the child walks and turns the foot inward instead of pointing straight ahead. The alignment of the lower limb structure changes in this disease, increasing the incidence of knee and hip osteoarthritis. This study aimed to determine the kinematic and joint loading in subjects walking with a toe-in gait pattern. This study selected two groups of subjects: normal subjects and those with toe-in gait due to an increased femoral head anteversion angle (each group consisted of 15 subjects). A Qualisys motion analysis system and a Kistler force plate were used to record the motions and forces applied to the leg while walking. OpenSim software (version 3.3) was used to analyze the range of motion, moments, muscle forces, and joint contact forces in both groups of subjects. The mean values of stride length for normal subjects (1.1 ± 0.141 m) and those with toe-in gait (0.94 ± 0.183 m) differed significantly. The mediolateral component of the ground reaction force decreased significantly in the toe-in gait group compared to normal subjects (p-value = 0.05). The peak force of most of the hip joint muscles increased significantly in those with toe-in gait compared to normal subjects (p-value < 0.05). The results of this study showed that those with toe-in gait, due to an increase in femoral head anteversion angle, only had a change in rotation of the pelvic and hip joint. There was no significant difference between walking speed and most ground reaction force components between normal subjects and those with toe-in gait. As the peaks of most of the hip joint muscles increased significantly in the toe-in gait group, this increased joint contact forces (especially the anteroposterior component of the hip joint and the mediolateral component of the knee joint), which may ultimately increase the incidence of hip and knee joint osteoarthritis.

Evaluation of standing stability in individuals with flatfeet.

OBJECTIVE: Flatfoot is one of the most common foot disorders, which not only influences the performance of the foot but also affects the alignments of the ankle, knee, and hip joints. The performance of the flat-arched individuals differs from that of normal individuals during walking. However, there is not enough information in the literature regarding their standing stability. Moreover, the influence of use of foot insole on standing stability has not been evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate standing stability in individuals with flatfoot with and without insole. METHODS: Two groups of normal and flat-arched individuals were recruited into this study. A Kistler force plate was used to measure the center of pressure (CoP), which is recognized as a good approximation of sway of center of gravity in a horizontal plane. Stability was determined by calculating the CoP excursions, path length, and velocity in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. The difference between stability in normal individuals and those with flatfoot was examined using the independent t test. The paired t test was used to determine the difference between stability in each group with and without insole. Significant P value was set at α ≤.05. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between stability of flat-arched and normal individuals based on CoP velocity and total velocity. In addition, there was no direct correlation between the severity of flatfoot and instability during quiet standing. However, the mean values of CoP total velocity during standing with and without insole were significantly different (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that individuals with flatfoot are more unstable when compared with normal individuals during quiet standing. It seems that the foot insole improves the alignment of foot structure and reduces the forces applied on the ligament, thus, improving standing stability. Therefore, stability assessment in patients with flatfoot may be important, and the insole is a useful modality that can be used to improve stability in this patient group. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level II: Prospective, comparative trial.