Effect on efficiency and cost-effectiveness when an observation unit is managed as a closed unit vs an open unit.

OBJECTIVE: To compare efficiency and cost-effectiveness of an observation unit (OU) when managed as a closed unit vs an open unit. METHODS: This observational, retrospective study of a 30-bed OU compared three time periods: Nov 2007 to Aug 2008 (period 1), Nov 2008 to Aug 2009 (period 2) and Nov 2010 to Aug 2011 (period 3). The OU was managed and staffed by non-emergency department physicians as an open unit during period 1, and a closed unit by emergency department physicians during periods 2 and 3. RESULTS: OU volume was greatest in period 3 (1 vs 3, 95% CI -235.8 to -127.9; 2 vs 3, 95% CI -191.9 to -84.095%). Periods 2 and 3 had shorter lengths of stay for discharged (1 vs 2, 95% CI -6.6 to 1.7; 1 vs 3, 95% CI -8.1 to -3.1) and admitted (1 vs 2, 95% CI -11.4 to -8.6; 1 vs 3, 95% CI -11.8 to -9.0) patients, less admission rates (P < .001), and less 30-day all cause admission rates after discharge (P < .0001). Cost was less during periods 2 and 3 for direct (1 vs 2, 95% CI -392.5 to -305.9; 1 vs 3, 95% CI -471.4 to -388.4), indirect (1 vs 2, 95% CI -249.5 to - 199.8; 1 vs 3, 95% CI -187 to-139.4) and total cost (1 vs 2, 95% CI -640.7 to -507; 1 vs 3, 95% CI -657.2 to -529). CONCLUSION: The same OU was more efficient and cost-effective when managed as a closed unit vs an open unit.

Ethical considerations for emergency care providers during pandemic influenza--ready or not...

When an infectious pandemic occurs in the United States, emergency care providers (ECPs) will be on the frontlines caring for infected, potentially infected, and non-infected patients. Logistically, the current emergency care system is not ready for a pandemic, but are the providers ethically ready? Some of the most difficult and challenging issues that will be raised during a pandemic will be ethical in nature. An ECP likely will be confronted with ethical values and value conflicts underlying restriction of liberty, duty to care, and resource allocation. This report summarizes the ethical concerns and challenges that ECPs face during an infectious pandemic, and raises ethical questions that may arise related to the role of an ECP as a healthcare provider and stakeholder.

Decreasing troponin turnaround time in the emergency department using the central laboratory: A process improvement study.

OBJECTIVES: To implement collaborative process improvement measures to reduce emergency department (ED) troponin turnaround time (TAT) to less than 60min using central laboratory. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective data study. A multidisciplinary team from the ED and laboratory identified opportunities and developed a new workflow model. Process changes were implemented in ED patient triage, staffing, lab collection and processing. Data collected included TAT of door-to-order, order-to-collect, collect-to-received, received-to-result, door-to-result, ED length of stay, and hemolysis rate before (January-August, 2011) and after (September 2011-June 2013) process improvement. RESULTS: After process improvement and implementation of the new workflow model, decreased median TAT (in min) was seen in door-to-order (54 [IQR43] vs. 11 [IQR20]), order-to-collect (15 [IQR 23] vs. 10 [IQR12]), collect-to-received (6 [IQR8] vs. 5 [IQR5]), received-to-result (30 [IQR12] vs. 24 [IQR11]), and overall door-to-result (117 [IQR60] vs. 60 [IQR40]). A troponin TAT of <60min was realized beginning in May 2012 (59 [IQR39]). Hemolysis rates decreased (14.63±0.74 vs. 3.36±1.99, p<0.0001), as did ED length of stay (5.87±2.73h vs. 5.15±2.34h, p<0.0001). Conclusion Troponin TAT of <60min using a central laboratory was achieved with collaboration between the ED and the laboratory; additional findings include a decreased ED length of stay.