Which Combination is the Best? A Comparison of the Predictive Potential of Serum Biomarker Combinations to Diagnose Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Without a gold-standard test, recent periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) literature has explored the utility of combining serological results, with promising findings. However, previous studies evaluated fewer than 200 patients and often studied only 1 to 2 test combinations. The purpose of this study was to accumulate a large single-institution cohort of revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA) patients to determine the diagnostic utility of combination serum biomarkers to identify PJI. METHODS: A single institution longitudinal database was assessed to identify all patients who underwent rTJA from 2017 to 2020. There were 1,363 rTJA patients (715 rTKA patients and 648 rTHA patients) including 273 PJI cases (20%) analyzed. The PJI was diagnosed post-rTJA utilizing 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, and interleukin 6 (IL-6) were systematically collected for all patients. RESULTS: The rTKA combination markers of CRP + ESR (sensitivity: 78.3%, specificity: 88.8%, positive predictive value (PPV): 70.0%, negative predictive value (NPV): 92.5%), CRP + D-dimer (sensitivity: 60.5%, specificity: 92.6%, PPV: 63.4%, NPV: 91.7%), and CRP + IL-6 (sensitivity: 38.5%, specificity: 100.0%, PPV: 100.0%, NPV: 92.9%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 94.4%, specificity: 75.0%, PPV: 55.5%, NPV: 97.6%). Similarly, the rTHA combination markers of CRP + ESR (sensitivity: 70.1%, specificity: 88.8%, PPV: 58.1%, NPV: 93.1%), CRP + D-dimer (sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 90.1%, PPV: 43.2%, NPV: 94.1%), and CRP + IL-6 (sensitivity: 21.4%, specificity: 98.4%, PPV: 60.0%, NPV: 91.7%) all yielded higher specificity than CRP alone (sensitivity: 84.7%, specificity: 77.5%, PPV: 45.4%, NPV: 95.8%). CONCLUSION: Overall, in diagnosing PJI for both rTKA and rTHA, 2-marker combinations yielded higher specificity, while 3-marker combinations yielded higher sensitivity compared to CRP alone. However, compared to all 2-marker and 3-marker combinations, CRP demonstrated superior overall diagnostic utility. These findings suggest that routine combination testing of markers for PJI diagnosis may be excessive and an unnecessary use of resources, especially in resource-limited situations.

Taking a Deeper Dive Into Malnutrition and Revision Arthroplasty: When Do Nutritionists Get Involved?

BACKGROUND: Perioperative malnutrition is associated with increased complications and mortality following revision total joint arthroplasty (rTJA). Nutritional consultations are useful in characterizing patient nutritional status but are inconsistently utilized post rTJA. We sought: 1) to describe the prevalence of nutritional consultations post rTJA, 2) to determine if septic rTJA patients needed consultations more often, and 3) if a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' from the nutritionist conferred increased readmission rates. METHODS: A retrospective study of 2,697 rTJAs performed in a single institution over a 4-year period was performed. Patient demographics, reasons for rTJA, occurrences of nutritional consultation (indicated if body mass index < 20, malnutrition screening tool score ≥ 2, or poor oral intake postoperatively), specific nutritional diagnosis (according to 2020 Electronic Nutrition Care Process Terminology and 90-day readmission rates were recorded and analyzed). Rates of consultations and adjusted logistic regressions were calculated. RESULTS: There were 501 patients (18.6%) who required nutritional consultations, with 55 (11.0%) of these patients receiving a 'malnutrition' diagnosis. Septic rTJA patients required significantly more nutritional consultations (P < .01) and were significantly more likely to have 'malnutrition' (P = .49). A diagnosis of malnutrition was associated with the highest odds of all-cause readmission (odds ratio (OR) = 3.89, P = .01), which was even higher than undergoing a septic rTJA. CONCLUSION: Nutritional consultations occur frequently following rTJA. Patients who receive a diagnosis of 'malnutrition' through consultation are at significantly higher risk for readmission and require close follow-up. Future efforts are needed to further characterize these patients in order to identify as well as optimize them preoperatively.