RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Functional recovery and return to work (RTW) after stroke are important rehabilitation goals that have significant impact on quality of life. Comparisons of functional outcomes and RTW between ischemic stroke (IS) and hemorrhagic stroke (HS), especially among young adults with stroke, have either been limited or yielded inconsistent results. We aimed to assess functional outcomes and ability to RTW in young adults with IS and HS, specifically primary spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). METHODS: Young adults with IS or SICH aged 18-50-years-old were included. Outcome measures were modified Rankins score (mRS) on discharge and 3-months and RTW at 3-months after stroke. Good functional outcome was defined as an mRS of 0-2. RESULTS: We included 459 patients (71.5% male) with a mean age of 43.3 ± 5.7 years, comprising 49.2% IS and 50.8% SICH. Patients with SICH were more likely to have unfavourable shifts in ordinal mRS on discharge (OR 7.52, CI 5.18-10.87, p < 0.001) and at 3-months (OR 6.41, CI 4.17-9.80, p < 0.001). Patients with IS more likely achieved good functional outcomes (80.2% vs. 51.8%, p < 0.001) and were able to RTW at 3-months (54.4% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.004). Among all stroke patients with good functional outcomes, one-third did not RTW at 3-months. Patients with longer length of hospitalisation and higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, especially in the domain categories of level of consciousness, vision, motor function, language and neglect, were less likely to RTW at 3-months. CONCLUSION: Patients with IS were more likely to RTW when compared to SICH patients. Many young stroke patients did not RTW despite good functional outcomes. Further research should therefore address differences in prognosis and identify predictors that influence ability to RTW after stroke in the young adult population.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled feasibility study investigates the ability for clinical application of the Brain-Computer Interface-based Soft Robotic Glove (BCI-SRG) incorporating activities of daily living (ADL)-oriented tasks for stroke rehabilitation. METHODS: Eleven recruited chronic stroke patients were randomized into BCI-SRG or Soft Robotic Glove (SRG) group. Each group underwent 120-minute intervention per session comprising 30-minute standard arm therapy and 90-minute experimental therapy (BCI-SRG or SRG). To perform ADL tasks, BCI-SRG group used motor imagery-BCI and SRG, while SRG group used SRG without motor imagery-BCI. Both groups received 18 sessions of intervention over 6 weeks. Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) scores were measured at baseline (week 0), post- intervention (week 6), and follow-ups (week 12 and 24). In total, 10/11 patients completed the study with 5 in each group and 1 dropped out. RESULTS: Though there were no significant intergroup differences for FMA and ARAT during 6-week intervention, the improvement of FMA and ARAT seemed to sustain beyond 6-week intervention for BCI-SRG group, as compared with SRG control. Incidentally, all BCI-SRG subjects reported a sense of vivid movement of the stroke-impaired upper limb and 3/5 had this phenomenon persisting beyond intervention while none of SRG did. CONCLUSION: BCI-SRG suggested probable trends of sustained functional improvements with peculiar kinesthetic experience outlasting active intervention in chronic stroke despite the dire need for large-scale investigations to verify statistical significance. SIGNIFICANCE: Addition of BCI to soft robotic training for ADL-oriented stroke rehabilitation holds promise for sustained improvements as well as elicited perception of motor movements.