Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 18(7): e315-e325, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in Western countries demonstrated BRAF V600E mutation only in a small subset of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. However, the prevalence and clinicopathologic significances of this mutation remain unclear in Chinese MM patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied diagnostic bone marrow samples from 205 Chinese MM patients by allele-specific PCR to detect BRAF V600E mutation and by high-resolution melting assay to detect KRAS and NRAS mutations. The mutations were confirmed by independent assays. RESULTS: BRAF V600E mutation was found in 9.3% of the cases, the highest prevalence hitherto reported. In addition, the mutation was significantly associated with hypercalcemia and a male predominance but not with aggressive extramedullary diseases or a high serum creatinine level as reported in Western studies. Importantly, BRAF V600E mutation was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in younger MM patients by subgroup analysis. Concurrent analysis of RAS mutations highlighted differential alteration spectrum of RAS signaling between Chinese and Western MM, which may suggest a unique myeloma-related genetic profile in Chinese patients. CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a higher prevalence of BRAF V600E mutation in Chinese MM patients. The associated prognostic impacts on younger patients could be beneficial to risk stratification and potential application of BRAF-targeted therapies in Chinese MM management. This is the first large-scale study revealing the prevalence and clinicopathologic significances of BRAF V600E mutation in Chinese myeloma.


Assuntos
Substituição de Aminoácidos , Mieloma Múltiplo/genética , Mieloma Múltiplo/patologia , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático , Biomarcadores Tumorais , China/epidemiologia , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Prevalência , Proteínas ras/genética
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 22(28): 6484-500, 2016 Jul 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27605883

RESUMO

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be severe and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. All patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy to prevent HBV reactivation. For patients with resolved HBV infection, no standard strategy has yet been established to prevent HBV reactivation. There are usually two options. One is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, whereby antiviral therapy is given as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal interval and period of monitoring. An alternative approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, especially for patients receiving high-risk therapy such as rituximab, newer generation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, obinutuzumab or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This strategy may effectively prevent HBV reactivation and avoid the inconvenience of repeated HBV DNA monitoring. Entecavir or tenofovir are preferred over lamivudine as prophylactic therapy. Although there is no well-defined guideline on the optimal duration of prophylactic therapy, there is growing evidence to recommend continuing prophylactic antiviral therapy for at least 12 mo after cessation of chemotherapy, and even longer for those who receive rituximab or who had high serum HBV DNA levels before the start of immunosuppressive therapy. Many novel agents have recently become available for the treatment of hematological malignancies, and these agents may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is currently limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, especially the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, which are B-cell receptor signaling modulators and reduce proliferation of malignant B-cells. Further studies are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy in the era of targeted therapy for hematological malignancies.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite B Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Ativação Viral , Tirosina Quinase da Agamaglobulinemia , Linfócitos B/imunologia , DNA Viral/sangue , Gerenciamento Clínico , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos de Superfície da Hepatite B/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/sangue , Hepatite B Crônica/imunologia , Hepatite B Crônica/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Inibidores de Fosfoinositídeo-3 Quinase , Proteínas Tirosina Quinases/antagonistas & inibidores , Rituximab/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa