Teprotumumab-Related Adverse Events in Thyroid Eye Disease: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the duration, incidence, reversibility, and severity of adverse events (AEs) in patients with thyroid eye disease (TED) treated with teprotumumab. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TED of all stages and activity levels treated with at least 4 infusions of teprotumumab. METHODS: Patients were treated with teprotumumab between February 2020 and October 2022 at 6 tertiary centers. Adverse event metrics were recorded at each visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measure was AE incidence and onset. Secondary outcome measures included AE severity, AE reversibility, AE duration, proptosis response, clinical activity score (CAS) reduction, and Gorman diplopia score improvement. RESULTS: The study evaluated 131 patients. Proptosis improved by 2 mm or more in 77% of patients (101/131), with average proptosis improvement of 3.0 ± 2.1 mm and average CAS reduction of 3.2 points. Gorman diplopia score improved by at least 1 point for 50% of patients (36/72) with baseline diplopia. Adverse events occurred in 81.7% of patients (107/131). Patients experienced a median of 4 AEs. Most AEs were mild (74.0% [97/131]), 28.2% (37/131) were moderate, and 8.4% (11/131) were severe. Mean interval AE onset was 7.9 weeks after the first infusion. Mean resolved AE duration was 17.6 weeks. Forty-six percent of patients (60/131) demonstrated at least 1 persistent AE at last follow-up. Mean follow-up was 70.2 ± 38.5 weeks after the first infusion. The most common type of AEs was musculoskeletal (58.0% [76/131]), followed by gastrointestinal (38.2% [50/131]), skin (38.2% [50/131]), ear and labyrinth (30.5% [40/131]), nervous system (20.6% [27/131]), metabolic (15.3% [20/131]), and reproductive system (12.2% [16/131]). Sixteen patients (12.2%) discontinued therapy because of AEs, including hearing loss (n = 4), inflammatory bowel disease flare (n = 2), hyperglycemia (n = 1), muscle spasms (n = 1), and multiple AEs (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Adverse events are commonly reported while receiving teprotumumab treatment. Most are mild and reversible; however, serious AEs can occur and may warrant treatment cessation. Treating physicians should inform patients about AE risk, properly screen patients before treatment, monitor patients closely throughout therapy, and understand how to manage AEs should they develop. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Real-World Experience With Teprotumumab in Patients With Dysthyroid Optic Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Teprotumumab, an insulin-like growth factor I receptor inhibitory antibody, improved proptosis, diplopia, inflammatory signs/symptoms, and quality of life in patients with active thyroid eye disease (TED) in clinical trials. The trials excluded patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON). Recently, many case reports and case series have reported the successful use of teprotumumab to treat DON. Here, we review the data from published cases and our clinical experience in treating patients having DON with teprotumumab. METHODS: A literature search was conducted of patients with DON treated with teprotumumab from January 2020 through September 2022. Data from DON patients from the authors' (M.A.T. and C.A.B.) clinical practice were included. Primary outcome measure was mean (SD) improvements for visual acuity, color vision, and visual fields. Improvements in proptosis and clinical activity score (CAS) and diplopia were compared before and after teprotumumab administration. RESULTS: Ten observational studies/case reports were identified along with 2 patients in our practice. In all, there were 24 active TED patients with DON (37 eyes) who were treated with teprotumumab. Mean (SD) age was 66.5 (13.6) years and 13 (54%) were females, disease duration ranged from 2 months to >15 years. 22/24 patients had none, minimal improvement or progression of visual loss with intravenous/oral corticosteroids, orbital decompression (n = 9), and orbital radiation (n = 2). There were 2 patients who received teprotumumab as the only therapy. Overall, 88% (21/24) reported improvement in visual acuity after teprotumumab and in 75% (18/24), improvement in vision was observed after just 2 infusions of teprotumumab. Three eyes had decompression surgery in close proximity to teprotumumab infusions and were excluded from analyses. Mean (SD) improvement in visual acuity was 3.73 lines (SD 3.74), range 2-15 lines in 33 eyes. The mean (SD) improvement in the mean deviation on visual field testing in 15 eyes was 5.6 db (3.0 db). Mean (SD) improvement in proptosis was 4.37 mm (SD: 2.11) (20 patients, 32 eyes); and clinical activity score: mean reduction of 5.1 (1.3) for 18 patients. Teprotumumab was well tolerated in all but one patient. Adverse events reported included fatigue, dysgeusia, hearing loss, nausea, hyperglycemia, and muscle spasms. CONCLUSIONS: Teprotumumab is an effective treatment for DON in our experience and in published cases in whom treatment with steroids, surgery, or orbital radiation was unsuccessful.

Frequency and Etiologies of Visual Disturbance After Cataract Surgery Identified in Neuro-Ophthalmology Clinics.

BACKGROUND: To identify the frequency and etiologies of visual disturbances after cataract surgery in patients referred to Neuro-ophthalmology. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review. Records of patients 18 years and older referred to neuro-ophthalmology clinics for new-onset visual disturbances within 6 months of cataract surgery were reviewed. Those with pre-existing neuro-ophthalmic disorders, combined intraocular procedures with cataract surgery, or inadequate follow-up were excluded. The main outcome measures were frequency and etiologies of visual disturbances after cataract surgery. Secondary analyses of a cohort of patients who had cataract surgery at our institution were performed to determine the frequency and etiology of visual disturbances after uneventful cataract surgery. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-three patients met the inclusion criteria (internal referral: 36/173, from outside surgeons: 137/173). Sixty-one percent (106/173) were newly diagnosed with neuro-ophthalmic etiologies, including 21% (36/173) with afferent and 40% (70/173) with efferent disorders. Thirty-six percent (62/173) of patients had non neuro-ophthalmic causes and 3% (5/173) had systemic conditions responsible for visual disturbances postoperatively. Decompensated strabismus causing diplopia was the most common neuro-ophthalmic diagnosis after cataract surgery (50%, 53/106). Of the 13,715 patients who had cataract surgery performed at our institution over a 9-year period, 20 of 36 patients referred for visual disturbances were identified with neuro-ophthalmic etiologies of which 85% (17/20) had postoperative diplopia. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, decompensated strabismus causing diplopia was the most common neuro-ophthalmic visual disturbance after cataract surgery. Detailed history and ocular alignment should be assessed before cataract surgery to identify patients with the risk.

Vision Loss as a Presenting Feature of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an acquired, immune-mediated, and clinically heterogeneous demyelinating disease affecting the nerve roots and peripheral nerves. We report a series of 4 patients who presented with early and progressive vision loss in the context of new-onset CIDP: 3 due to papilledema and 1 due to optic neuropathy without papilledema. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of 4 patients with vision loss as a presenting feature of CIDP evaluated at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from January 2016 to August 2021. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, and treatment data were collected via retrospective medical record review. RESULTS: Case 1 was a 51-year-old man with 2 months of progressive bilateral papilledema associated with reduced visual acuity (count fingers at 1 foot in each eye) and severely constricted visual fields. Case 2 was a 36-year-old man with 4 months of worsening headaches, reduced visual acuity (count fingers at 1 foot in each eye), severely constricted visual fields, and papilledema. Case 3 was a 39-year-old man with papilledema causing progressive vision loss (20/80 in both eyes), headaches, and relapsing limb sensorimotor deficits. Case 4 was a 19-year-old man with 3 months of progressive bilateral visual decline (20/400 in the right eye, 20/600 in the left eye), central scotoma, and optic disc pallor consistent with optic neuropathy without papilledema. All 4 patients met clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria of CIDP. Cases 3 and 4 each tested positive for serum neurofascin-155 IgG4 antibodies. All patients were managed with immunomodulatory therapy. Cases 1 and 2 also each required surgical intervention with bilateral optic nerve sheath fenestration and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting procedures. CONCLUSION: Vision loss from optic neuropathy with or without papilledema has rarely been reported in CIDP, and typically has been described in the context of longstanding disease. Our cases highlight how CIDP can present with early vision loss that may be profound and challenging to manage if diagnosis is delayed. CIDP should be considered in any patient with new progressive vision loss when associated with peripheral sensorimotor symptoms and elevated CSF protein. The small subgroup of CIDP patients with neurofascin-155 antibodies may be at particular risk of optic nerve involvement.

Gazing Into the Crystal Ball: Calciphylaxis Causing Striking Retinal Vascular Calcification, Ocular Ischemic Syndrome, Crystalline Retinopathy, and Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

ABSTRACT: A 72-year-old woman with membranous glomerulonephritis and failed renal transplant on peritoneal dialysis presented with bilateral vision loss. She reported several months of diminishing right eye vision that worsened after cataract extraction. On presentation, visual acuity was hand motion in the right and 20/100 in the left eye with a right afferent pupillary defect. Confrontation visual fields were constricted bilaterally. Intraocular pressure was 23 in the right eye, and there was diffuse right eye central corneal opacity with iris neovascularization. Fundus examination revealed bilateral pale optic nerves with cotton wool spot inferior to the left optic disc and diffuse arteriolar whitening with crystalline deposits in the left macula. Given fundus appearance, concurrent ischemic optic neuropathy, and ocular ischemic syndrome, ocular calciphylaxis was suspected. The patient reported development of painful gluteal nodules a month prior, and biopsy revealed calcinosis cutis, a dermatopathologic finding on the spectrum of calcific vasculitides. Her vision continued to decline in both eyes with left eye vision of 20/400. Intravenous sodium thiosulfate through hemodialysis was started with initial improvement in left eye vision to 20/125, but subsequently declined despite treatment. Pathogenesis of systemic calciphylaxis is poorly understood but believed to result from upregulation of osteogenesis and decreased inhibition of vascular calcification in parathyroid axis dyscrasias due to end-stage renal disease. Excess serum calcium-phosphate deposits in blood vessels causing tissue infarction, most commonly in the skin. Prior case reports have described ischemic optic neuropathy mimicking giant cell arteritis and crystalline retinopathy with ocular ischemic syndrome separately. Treatment with empiric intravenous sodium thiosulfate and calcium chelation may preserve vision in some patients.

Role of Ocular Ultrasonography to Distinguish Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema.

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of ocular ultrasonography (OUS) to distinguish papilledema from pseudopapilledema. METHODS: Forty-nine study participants, with optic disc elevation, underwent neuro-ophthalmic evaluation, OUS, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve head at the initial and follow-up visits (≤6 months apart). Participants were classified as having papilledema if there was a change in optic nerve appearance on fundus photographs, as determined by a masked observer, between initial and follow-up visits ≤6 months apart. OUS was considered positive when the optic nerve sheath width was >3.3 mm and the 30° test was positive. Ocular ultrasonographic findings were correlated in patients who had papilledema vs patients who had pseudopapilledema. In a subanalysis, OUS findings were also correlated with change in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on OCT of the optic nerve head between initial and follow-up visits. RESULTS: OUS was 68% (17/25) sensitive for papilledema and 54% (13/24) specific for pseudopapilledema. When using OCT parameters to define papilledema, the sensitivity of OUS to diagnose papilledema decreased to 62%. Positive OUS correlated with elevated opening pressure on lumbar puncture and with signs of increased intracranial pressure on MRI. CONCLUSION: OUS alone was less sensitive in diagnosing papilledema than previously thought. Therefore, OUS may not be helpful in distinguishing between papilledema and pseudopapilledema.

Utility of Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Differentiating Papilledema From Pseudopapilledema: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: Prospective and longitudinal studies assessing the utility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to differentiate papilledema from pseudopapilledema are lacking. We studied the sensitivity and specificity of baseline and longitudinal changes in SD-OCT parameters with 3D segmentation software to distinguish between papilledema and pseudopapilledema in a cohort of patients referred for evaluation of undiagnosed optic disc elevation. METHODS: Fifty-two adult patients with optic disc elevation were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study. A diagnosis of papilledema was made when there was a change in the appearance of the optic disc elevation on fundus photographs as noted by an independent observer at or before 6 months. The degree of optic disc elevation was graded using the Frisen scale and patients with mild optic disc elevation (Frisen grades 1 and 2) were separately analyzed. SD-OCT parameters including peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), total retinal thickness (TRT), paracentral ganglion cell layer-inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) thickness, and optic nerve head volume (ONHV) at baseline and within 6 months of follow-up were measured. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (52%) patients were diagnosed with papilledema and 25 (48%) with pseudopapilledema. Among patients with mild optic disc elevation (Frisen grades 1 and 2), baseline pRNFL (110.1 µm vs 151.3 µm) and change in pRNFL (ΔpRNFL) (7.3 µm vs 52.3 µm) were greater among those with papilledema. Baseline and absolute changes in TRT and ONHV were also significantly higher among patients with papilledema. The mean GCL-IPL thickness was similar at baseline, but there was a small reduction in GCL-IPL thickness among patients with papilledema. Receiver operator curves (ROCs) were generated; ΔpRNFL (0.93), ΔTRT (0.94), and ΔONHV (0.95) had the highest area under the curve (AUC). CONCLUSIONS: The mean baseline and absolute changes in SD-OCT measurements (pRFNL, TRT, and ONHV) were significantly greater among patients with papilledema, and remained significantly greater when patients with mild optic disc elevation were separately analyzed. ROCs demonstrated that ΔpRNFL, ΔTRT, and ΔONHV have the highest AUC and are best able to differentiate between papilledema and pseudopapilledema.

Outcomes After Transcervical Thymectomy for Ocular Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Inverse Probability Weighting.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of thymectomy in reducing requirement for corticosteroids, symptom severity, need for immunosuppression, and hospitalization rates in patients with seropositive generalized myasthenia has recently been established. It is unclear whether this benefit applies to patients with myasthenia and purely ocular manifestations (ocular myasthenia gravis [OMG]). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study of patients with OMG. Patients were included if their diagnosis was confirmed by acetylcholine receptor or muscle-specific kinase antibodies, abnormal electrophysiology, or a positive edrophonium test and at least 1 year of clinical follow-up. At each visit, the presence and severity of ocular and generalized symptoms was ascertained using a 4-point scale. Prednisone dose, steroid-sparing agent use, and need for intravenous immunoglobulin or plasmapheresis were recorded. The effect of thymectomy on time-weighted prednisone dose and symptom severity score was assessed using linear regression models. To adjust for nonrandomization of thymectomy, we used inverse probability weighting using a propensity score model derived from the prethymectomy observation period for thymectomy patients and a 6-month lead-in period for nonthymectomy patients that incorporated age, sex, acetylcholine receptor antibody seropositivity, disease severity (as defined by both symptom severity and treatment requirement), and treating physician preferences. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (30 with thymectomy and 52 nonthymectomy) were included. In unadjusted analyses, time-weighted daily prednisone dose was 2.9 mg higher with thymectomy compared with nonthymectomy (95% CI: 0.2-5.7), but after inverse probability weighting, this was no longer statistically significant (difference = 1.7 mg, 95% CI: -0.8 to 4.2). There was no statistically significant difference in symptom severity score (adjusted difference = 0.35, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.72) or risk of generalization (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study that used statistical techniques to account for nonrandomization, no significant differences in prednisone dose or symptom severity after thymectomy in ocular myasthenia were demonstrated.

Real-World Clinical Experience With Idebenone in the Treatment of Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) leads to bilateral central vision loss. In a clinical trial setting, idebenone has been shown to be safe and to provide a trend toward improved visual acuity, but long-term evidence of effectiveness in real-world clinical practice is sparse. METHODS: Open-label, multicenter, retrospective, noncontrolled analysis of long-term visual acuity and safety in 111 LHON patients treated with idebenone (900 mg/day) in an expanded access program. Eligible patients had a confirmed mitochondrial DNA mutation and had experienced the onset of symptoms (most recent eye) within 1 year before enrollment. Data on visual acuity and adverse events were collected as per normal clinical practice. Efficacy was assessed as the proportion of patients with either a clinically relevant recovery (CRR) or a clinically relevant stabilization (CRS) of visual acuity. In the case of CRR, time to and magnitude of recovery over the course of time were also assessed. RESULTS: At time of analysis, 87 patients had provided longitudinal efficacy data. Average treatment duration was 25.6 months. CRR was observed in 46.0% of patients. Analysis of treatment effect by duration showed that the proportion of patients with recovery and the magnitude of recovery increased with treatment duration. Average gain in best-corrected visual acuity for responders was 0.72 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR), equivalent to more than 7 lines on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Furthermore, 50% of patients who had a visual acuity below 1.0 logMAR in at least one eye at initiation of treatment successfully maintained their vision below this threshold by last observation. Idebenone was well tolerated, with most adverse events classified as minor. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the benefit of idebenone treatment in recovering lost vision and maintaining good residual vision in a real-world setting. Together, these findings indicate that idebenone treatment should be initiated early and be maintained more than 24 months to maximize efficacy. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of idebenone.

Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for Improving the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Without Papilledema.

OBJECTIVE: Revised diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) were proposed in part to reduce misdiagnosis of intracranial hypertension without papilledema (WOP) by using 3 or 4 MRI features of intracranial hypertension when a sixth nerve palsy is absent. This study was undertaken to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the MRI criteria and to validate their utility for diagnosing IIH in patients with chronic headaches and elevated opening pressure (CH + EOP), but WOP. METHODS: Brain MRIs from 80 patients with IIH with papilledema (WP), 33 patients with CH + EOP, and 70 control patients with infrequent episodic migraine were assessed in a masked fashion for MRI features of intracranial hypertension. RESULTS: Reduced pituitary gland height was moderately sensitive for IIH WP (80%) but had low specificity (64%). Increased optic nerve sheath diameter was less sensitive (51%) and only moderately specific (83%). Flattening of the posterior globe was highly specific (97%) but had low sensitivity (57%). Transverse venous sinus stenosis was moderately sensitive for IIH WP (78%) but of undetermined specificity. A combination of any 3 of 4 MRI features was nearly 100% specific, while maintaining a sensitivity of 64%. Of patients with CH + EOP, 30% had 3 or more MRI features, suggesting IIH WOP in those patients. CONCLUSION: A combination of any 3 of 4 MRI features is highly specific for intracranial hypertension and suggests IIH WOP when present in patients with chronic headache and no papilledema.

Retrospective, Multicenter Comparison of the Clinical Presentation of Patients Presenting With Diplopia From Giant Cell Arteritis vs Other Causes.

BACKGROUND: Although giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a well-known cause of transient and permanent vision loss, diplopia as a presenting symptom of this condition is uncommon. We compared symptoms and signs of patients presenting with diplopia from GCA to those from other causes. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective study comparing the clinical characteristics of patients presenting with diplopia from GCA with age-matched controls. Demographic information, review of symptoms, ophthalmic examination, and laboratory data of biopsy-proven patients with GCA were compared with those of age-matched controls presenting with diplopia. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients presented with diplopia from GCA, 19 with constant diplopia, and 8 with transient diplopia. All patients with constant diplopia from GCA were matched with 67 control subjects who had diplopia from other etiologies. Patients with GCA were more likely to describe other accompanying visual symptoms (58% vs 25%, P = 0.008), a greater number of systemic GCA symptoms (3.5, GCA vs 0.6, controls, P < 0.001) such as headache (94% [17/18] vs 39% [23/67]; P < 0.001), jaw claudication (80% [12/15] vs 0% [0/36]; P < 0.001), and scalp tenderness (44% [7/16] vs 7% [3/43]; P < 0.001). Ocular ischemic lesions (26% vs 1%, P < 0.001) were also common in patients with diplopia from GCA. Inflammatory markers were elevated significantly in patients with GCA vs controls (erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 91% [10/11] vs 12% [3/25], P < 0.001; C-reactive protein: 89% [8/9] vs 11% [2/19], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GCA is a rare but serious cause of diplopia among older adults and must be differentiated from other more common benign etiologies. Our study suggests that most patients with diplopia from GCA have concerning systemic symptoms and/or elevated inflammatory markers that should trigger further work-up. Moreover, careful ophthalmoscopic examination should be performed to look for presence of ocular ischemic lesions in older patients presenting with acute diplopia.

Inflammatory Orbitopathy Associated With Ipilimumab.

In this case report, the clinical presentation of an inflammatory orbitopathy seen following treatment with ipilimumab is described. After 3 rounds of ipilimumab (10 mg/kg) treatment for Stage III metastatic melanoma, the subject of this case report developed acute eye pain and proptosis. At initial presentation, she had marked proptosis and diffuse severe ophthalmoparesis. After treatment with high-dose steroids, over a period of 6 months, the symptoms gradually resolved fully. Although the condition may mimic thyroid-associated orbitopathy, imaging and laboratory features suggest that the orbitopathy associated with ipilimumab is not a secondary effect of thyroid dysfunction but a distinct inflammatory condition. The authors conclude that immune-related side effects can occur with biologic agents used to treat malignancies and these side-effects can involve the eye. This case illustrates the occurrence of an inflammatory orbitopathy associated with ipilimumab treatment.

Orbital ultrasonography in the diagnosis of neoplastic extraocular muscle enlargement.

Neoplastic infiltration of the extraocular muscle (EOM) is a rare condition which can pose a diagnostic dilemma due to its rarity and overlapping ultrasonographic features with orbital myositis. The ultrasonographic features of neoplastic enlargement of EOM have not been systematically studied and previously have been described in only a few case reports. Orbital ultrasonography, in conjunction with the pattern of ocular misalignment, was assessed for its potential role in identifying patients with neoplastic EOM enlargement. Retrospective chart review of patients with neoplasm and myositis. The clinical features of 8 patients with neoplastic infiltration of the EOM were compared to 15 patients with myositis. In the neoplastic group the width of the EOM was (10.5 mm) almost twice the normal width of the muscle with myositis (p < 0.001). All the muscles in the neoplastic category were low to medium reflective. Paretic deviation was seen in 4/8(50%), purely restrictive in 2/8 (25%) and combined pattern in 2/8 (25%) were noted. In the myositis group the average EOM enlargement was 5.8 mm and all muscles showed low reflectivity. Although ultrasonographic features overlapped between the 2 groups paretic deviations were more common in the neoplastic group versus the myositis group (50% versus 7%). Neoplastic muscle enlargement tends to be larger with paretic deviations of ocular motility seen clinically. These findings in a patient with EOM enlargement should raise the suspicion of neoplasm as the etiology and further work up should be considered.

Management of acute cranial nerve 3, 4 and 6 palsies: role of neuroimaging.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article will discuss the management of isolated, acute cranial nerve 3,4 and 6 palsies with special focus on the role of neuroimaging in older adults based on recently published data. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute cranial nerve palsies affecting the third, fourth or sixth cranial nerves in isolation or in combination with other neurological signs and symptoms can be due to a variety of causes such as ischemia, inflammation, infection and compression of the ocular motor nerves. Although neuroimaging is generally recommended in all individuals presenting with ocular motor nerve palsies that occur in association with other neurological signs and symptoms, the indications for neuroimaging in older individuals (age > 50 years) who present with acute isolated ocular motor nerve palsies are less clear and controversial. Past and recent studies have attempted to address this question. A recent prospective study found that overall 16.5% of adult patients presenting with acute ocular motor mononeuropathy had structural lesions on MRI scan and 4.6% with fourth and sixth nerve palsies and no risk factors were found to have positive MRI scans. SUMMARY: On the basis of recently published data, we recommend contrast-enhanced MRI for all patients presenting with acute, isolated ocular motor mononeuropathies irrespective of age. Studies have clearly shown a small but significant prevalence of important findings in this group of patients thus favoring neuroimaging at the time of diagnosis.