Phase 3 Safety and Immunogenicity Study of a Three-dose Series of Twenty-valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants and Toddlers.

BACKGROUND: Global pediatric immunization programs with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have reduced vaccine-type pneumococcal disease, but a substantial disease burden of non-PCV serotypes remains. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized (1:1), double-blind study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of 20-valent PCV (PCV20) relative to 13-valent PCV (PCV13) in healthy infants. Participants received 2 infant doses and a toddler dose of PCV20 or PCV13, with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis combination vaccine at all doses and measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccines at the toddler dose. Primary pneumococcal immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate noninferiority (NI) of PCV20 to PCV13 for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations after infant and toddler doses and percentages of participants with predefined serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations after infant doses. Safety endpoints included local reactions, systemic events and adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 1204 participants were vaccinated (PCV20, n = 601; PCV13, n = 603). One month after the toddler dose, 19/20 serotypes met NI for immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations; serotype 6B narrowly missed NI [PCV20/PCV13 geometric mean ratio: 0.57 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.67); NI criterion: lower 2-sided 95% confidence interval >0.5]. Sixteen/twenty serotypes met NI for ≥1 primary objective after 2 infant doses. PCV20 induced robust opsonophagocytic activity, and boosting responses were observed for all vaccine serotypes, including those missing statistical NI. The safety/tolerability profile of PCV20 was like that of PCV13. CONCLUSIONS: PCV20 3-dose series in infants was safe and elicited robust immune responses. Based on these results and PCV13 experience, PCV20 3-dose series is expected to be protective for all 20 vaccine serotypes. NCT04546425.

A phase 3 randomized study to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in healthy Japanese infants.

OBJECTIVES: Safety and immunogenicity evaluation of a 4-dose series with 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20). METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind study randomized healthy Japanese infants to receive 4 doses (3 infant doses, 1 toddler dose) of PCV20 by subcutaneous (SC) or intramuscular (IM) injection or 13-valent PCV (PCV13) SC. A primary immunogenicity objective was to demonstrate noninferiority of PCV20 SC to PCV13 SC for percentages of participants meeting predefined serotype-specific immunoglobulin G concentrations 1 month after Dose 3. The 7 additional PCV20 serotypes were compared with the lowest vaccine serotype result in the PCV13 group. Safety and tolerability were assessed as the primary safety objective. RESULTS: Overall, 668 participants were randomized (PCV20 SC, n = 226; PCV13 SC, n = 224; PCV20 IM, n = 218). The primary noninferiority objective for PCV20 SC to PCV13 SC was met for 11/13 matched and 5/7 additional serotypes. Additional data showed PCV20 SC and IM elicited robust functional opsonophagocytic activity and boosting responses to all 20 vaccine serotypes. PCV20 had a similar safety/tolerability profile to PCV13, although local reactions were less frequent with PCV20 IM. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-dose series of PCV20 SC or IM elicited immune responses expected to be protective against all 20 serotypes in Japanese infants. NCT04530838.

A Phase Three Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Four-dose Series of 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Infants.

BACKGROUND: The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was developed to extend pneumococcal disease protection beyond 13-valent PCV (PCV13). METHODS: This phase 3, double-blind study conducted in the United States/Puerto Rico evaluated PCV20 safety and immunogenicity. Healthy infants were randomized to receive a 4-dose series of PCV20 or PCV13 at 2, 4, 6 and 12-15 months old. Objectives included demonstrating noninferiority (NI) of PCV20 to PCV13 immunoglobulin G (IgG) geometric mean concentrations after doses 3 and 4 and percentages of participants with predefined IgG concentrations after dose 3, with 7 additional PCV20 serotypes compared with the lowest result among vaccine serotypes in the PCV13 group. Safety assessments included local reactions, systemic events, adverse events, serious adverse events and newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions. RESULTS: Overall, 1991 participants were vaccinated (PCV20, n = 1001; PCV13, n = 990). For IgG geometric mean concentrations 1 month after both doses 3 and 4, all 20 serotypes met NI criteria (geometric mean ratio lower 2-sided 95% confidence interval > 0.5). For percentages of participants with predefined IgG concentrations after dose 3, NI (percentage differences lower 2-sided 95% confidence interval > -10%) was met for 8/13 matched serotypes and 6/7 additional serotypes; 4 serotypes missed the statistical NI criterion by small margins. PCV20 also elicited functional and boosting responses to all 20 serotypes. The safety profile of PCV20 was similar to PCV13. CONCLUSION: A 4-dose series of PVC20 was well tolerated and elicited robust serotype-specific immune responses expected to help protect infants and young children against pneumococcal disease due to the 20 vaccine serotypes. Clinical trial registration: NCT04382326.

Limb-Salvage Surgery of Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Sciatic Nerve Involvement.

BACKGROUND: The surgical resection of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) with sciatic nerve involvement presents a significant surgical and oncological challenge. Current treatment strategies pursue a multimodal approach with the aim of limb preservation. We aim to evaluate the outcomes of limb-sparing surgery of STS in a patient cohort and to propose a classification for STS with sciatic nerve involvement. METHODS: Patients receiving limb-preserving resections for STS with sciatic nerve involvement between 01/2010 and 01/2017 were included. Clinical and oncological data were prospectively collected in a computerized database and retrospectively analyzed. Sciatic nerve involvement in STS was classified preoperatively as follows: type A for nerve encasement; type B for nerve contact; and type C for no nerve involvement. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients with STS were treated, of which 27 patients had STS with sciatic nerve involvement. Eight patients with type A tumors (29.6%) underwent sciatic nerve resection, and 19 patients with type B tumors (70.4%) received epineural dissections. Disease progression was observed in 8 patients (29.6%) with a local recurrence of 11.1% and distant metastasis in 29.6%. The type of nerve resection significantly influenced leg function but had no impact on disease recurrence or overall survival. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of carefully selected patients with STS and sciatic nerve involvement, the extent of sciatic nerve resection had no significant impact on disease recurrence or survival. Precise classification of neural involvement may therefore be useful in selecting the appropriate degree of nerve resection, without compromising oncological outcome or unnecessarily sacrificing leg function.