The use of cement in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Despite the availability of modern implants and techniques, Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (R-TKA) still poses a challenge to surgeons, particularly the management of bone loss/defects and the secure fixation of implants. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement plays an important role for fixation as fully uncemented fixation in RTKA is rarely used. Cement can be employed as part of a full cementing construct or as a hybrid construct. While in fully cemented implants, the diaphyseal stem as well as any couplers or connectors in the metaphysis are cemented, in hybrid cementing, only the component parts at the joint surface and metaphysis are cemented, while the diaphyseal stem is fixed in a press-fit manner. In this article the literature on the in vitro as well on the in vivo results of both fixation options is reviewed. Although the fixation mechanism of both constructs are different, radiographic and clinical survivorship appear similar for both techniques. Although there appears to be a trend towards a hybrid fixation method, the choice of which technique to employ in revision total knee arthroplasty will depend on the surgeons' familiarity with each technique as well as the factors peculiar to each patients anatomy.

Revising a loosened cancellous screw with a larger screw does not restore original pull-out strength - A biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: Cancellous screw fixation is often used in fracture fixation. When this screw is over-tightened, damage to the bone and other non-linear processes such as fracture and construct failure would be involved. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the reduction in pull-out strength when a cancellous screw spins and (2) to determine how much pull-out strength can be restored by revising with a larger diameter screw. METHODS: A biomechanical study using synthetic polyurethane foam (320 kg/m3) was performed to assess (1) the pull-out strength of a 6.5 mm cancellous screw, (2) the pull-out strength of a loosened 6.5 mm cancellous screw and (3) the pull-out strength of a loosened 6.5 mm cancellous screw revised with a 7.3 mm cancellous screw. FINDINGS: The baseline pull-out strength of the 6.5 mm cancellous screw was 2213.91 ± 200.51 N. There was a 79.1% (463.79 ± 99.95 N) reduction in pull-out strength once spinning occurs (p = 0.027). When a spinning 6.5 mm cancellous screw was revised to a 7.3 mm cancellous screw, the pull-out strength increased to 1313.65 ± 93.23 N, 59.3% of the baseline pull-out strength (2213.91 ± 200.51 N) (p = 0.027). INTEPRETATION: A loosened 6.5 mm cancellous screw results in a 79.1% reduction in pull-out strength. Revising a loosened cancellous screw by inserting a larger 7.3 mm diameter screw partially improves the pull-out strength to 59.3% of the baseline. Surgeons should consider the use of "two-finger tight" torque when inserting a screw to avoid stripping.