Left atrial strain reproducibility using vendor-dependent and vendor-independent software.

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) enables objective assessment of left atrial (LA) deformation through the analysis of myocardial strain, which can be measured by different speckle-tracking software. The aim of this study was to compare the consistency of 3 different commercially available software, which include vendor-specific software for measuring left ventricle (VSSLV), vendor-independent software packages for measuring LV strain (VISLV) and vendor-independent software packages for measuring LA strain (VISLA). METHODS: Sixty-four subjects (mean age: 44 ± 16 years, 50% males) underwent conventional echocardiograms using a GE Vivid 9 (GE Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) cardiac ultrasound system. Standard apical 4 and 2 chamber views of the left atrium were obtained in each subject with a frame-rate range of 40-71 frames/s. LA strain during the contraction phase (Sct), conduit phase (Scd), reservoir phase (Sr = Sct + Scd) were analyzed by 2 independent observers and 3 different software. RESULTS: Sct, Scd, Sr were, respectively, - 11.26 ± 2.45%, - 16.77 ± 7.06%, and 28.03 ± 7.58% with VSSLV, - 14.77 ± 3.59%, - 23.17 ± 10.33%, and 38.23 ± 10.99% with VISLV, and - 14.80 ± 3.88%, - 23.94 ± 10.48%, and 38.73 ± 11.56% when VISLA was used. A comparison of strain measurements between VSSLV and VIS (VISLV and VISLA) showed VIS had significantly smaller mean differences and narrower limits of agreement. Similar results were observed in the coefficient of variation (CV) for measurements between VSSLV and VIS (VISLV and VISLA). Comparison of the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated that measurement reliability was weaker with VSSLV (ICC < 0.6) than with VIS (VISLV and VISLA) (ICC > 0.9). For intra-observer ICCs, VISLA > VSSLV = VISLV. For inter-observer ICCs, VSSLV > VISLA > VISLV. CONCLUSIONS: Software measurement results of LA strain vary considerably. We recommended not measuring LA strain across vendor platforms.

Left Atrial Strain as Evaluated by Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking Predicts Left Atrial Appendage Dysfunction in Chinese Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Left atrial appendage (LAA) dysfunction identified by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a powerful predictor of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study is to assess if there is a correlation between the left atrial (LA) functional parameter and LAA dysfunction in the AF patients. This cross-sectional study included a total of 249 Chinese AF patients who did not have cardiac valvular diseases and were undergoing cardiac ablation. TEE was performed in all the patients who were categorized into two groups according to their left atrial appendage (LAA) function. A total of 120 of the 249 AF patients had LAA dysfunction. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess the independent factors that correlated with the LAA dysfunction. Different predictive models for the LAA dysfunction were compared with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The final ROC curve on the development and validation datasets was drawn based on the calculation of each area under the curves (AUC). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the peak left atrial strain (PLAS) was the most significant factor that correlated with the LAA dysfunction. PLAS did not show inferiority amongst all the models and revealed strong discrimination ability on both the development and validation datasets with AUC 0.818 and 0.817. Our study showed that a decrease in PLAS is independently associated with LAA dysfunction in the AF patients.