Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft is associated with a higher rate of return to preinjury levels of performance in high-level athletes than anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft.

PURPOSE: Return to preinjury levels of performance (RTP) is the main goal after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) for athletes when ACL graft rupture is a career-threatening event. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the associated factors for RTP and subsequent ACL injury after ACL-R using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HT) autograft in high-level athletes with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 24 months. METHODS: This retrospective study included 157 patients who had preinjury Tegner activity level of 9 and underwent primary ACL-R using BPTB (average age, 16.9 years; 35 males and 36 females) or HT (average age, 17.2 years; 49 males and 37 females). The mean follow-ups were 33.6 months in BPTB and 44.5 months in HT, respectively. The data were obtained based on routine clinical follow-ups and telephone interviews performed by the surgeon. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient variables with RTP and subsequent ACL injury. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (63.1%) were able to RTP. The rate of RTP in BPTB (74.6%) was significantly higher than that of HT (53.5%) (p < 0.05). The overall average timing of RTP after ACL-R was 10.0 months while that was significantly earlier in BPTB (9.7 months) than in HT (10.5 months) (p < 0.05). Twenty-three (14.6%) and 21 patients (13.4%) had ACL graft ruptures and ACL injuries in the contralateral knees, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that BPTB (odds ratio [OR], 2.590; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.300-5.160; p = 0.007) was associated with a higher potential for RTP after ACL-R. The incidence of ACL graft rupture after ACL-R decreased with BPTB (OR, 0.861; 95% CI, 0.770-0.962; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The use of BPTB autograft was associated with a higher rate of RTP and a lower incidence of ACL graft rupture compared to ACL-R using HT autograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and female sex are associated with the presence of cyclops lesions and syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Associated risk factors for the development of cyclops lesions have been little. Investigated, because most previous studies have limited their research to cases with symptomatic cyclops lesions (cyclops syndrome). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of cyclops lesions using magnetic resonance image (MRI) at 6 and 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R), and to investigate the associated risk factors of cyclops lesions and syndrome. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent ACL-R using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTPB) or hamstring tendon autograft from 2008 to 2017 was conducted. Predictor variables (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], time from injury to ACL-R, preinjury Tegner activity score, graft, meniscal and cartilage injury, and notch width index on MRI for the presence of cyclops lesions and syndrome were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Four hundred and fifty-five patients (225 males and 230 females) were enrolled. One hundred and four patients (22.9%) had cyclops lesions, and all cyclops lesions were detected on MRI at 6 months post-operatively. In addition, 20 patients (4.4%) had cyclops syndrome which means that these were symptomatic cases. The risk factors for presence of cyclops lesions were BPTB autograft (OR = 2.85; 95% CI 1.75-4.63; P < 0.001) and female sex (OR = 2.03; 95% CI 1.27-3.25; P = 0.003). The presence of cyclops syndrome increased with graft (BPTB) (OR = 18.0; 95% CI 3.67-88.3; Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation P < 0.001), female sex (OR = 3.27; 95% CI 1.07-10.0; P = 0.038), and increased BMI (OR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.05-1.39; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: All cyclops lesions were detected 6 months after ACL-R, and the majority of them were asymptomatic. BPTB autograft and female sex were the significant risk factors for the presence of cyclops lesions and syndrome. In addition, increased BMI was associated with a higher risk of developing cyclops syndrome. When BPTB autograft is used for a female patient, full active knee extension should be encouraged in the early period after ACL-R to prevent cyclops lesion formation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Comparison of the Healing Outcomes of Conservative Treatment for Stable Juvenile Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Lateral Femoral Condyle With Normal Lateral Meniscus and Incomplete Discoid Lateral Meniscus.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the healing outcomes of conservative treatment for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the lateral femoral condyle with normal lateral meniscus and incomplete discoid lateral meniscus (DLM). METHODS: Forty-four knees in 37 juvenile patients (mean age 9.9 y) with stable OCD and whose lateral meniscus shape was normal or incomplete DLM were enrolled. All patients underwent conservative treatment with physical activities prohibited. For each lateral meniscus group, patient demographics including pretreatment Tegner activity scale, OCD stage, and Lysholm score, radiographic healing status; complete or incomplete healing at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, time to complete healing and post-treatment clinical scores were evaluated. RESULTS: There were 21 (47.8%) and 23 (52.3%) knees with normal menisci and incomplete DLM, respectively. At 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after conservative treatment, healed OCD status was noted in 3 (14.3%), 12 (57.1%), and 19 (90.5%) knees of the normal type and in 3 (13.0%), 12 (52.2%), and 20 (86.9%) knees of the incomplete DLM type, respectively (P>0.05). The mean time to healing in each group was 198 and 181 days, respectively. No significant differences in terms of OCD healing rate at each time, time to healing, and post-treatment clinical scores were found between the groups. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in the OCD healing rate or time to healing were found between the normal and incomplete DLM type. Therefore, treatment strategy for OCD with stable and asymptomatic incomplete DLM should be the same as that for those occurring with a normal meniscus.

Shallow knee flexion angle during femoral tunnel creation using modified transtibial technique can reduce femoral graft bending angle in ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare femoral graft bending angle between patients with femoral tunnel reamed at less than 80° of knee flexion and those with 80° and above in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using modified transtibial technique. METHODS: Forty-eight patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar-tendon-bone autograft in modified transtibial technique and CT scan at 1 week postoperatively were included in this study. A femoral guidewire insertion into aimed femoral position at the medial wall of the femoral lateral condyle was started at about 75° of knee flexion. When the tip of the guidewire was blown out into femoral posterior wall, the guidewire was inserted again after increasing knee flexion angle. Distance from femoral tunnel exit on the femoral lateral cortex-femoral posterior cortex (Distance-E) was measured on postoperative lateral radiograph. Femoral and tibial tunnel position was measured on 3-D CT images. In addition, femoral graft bending angle was measured on reconstructed 2-D CT images. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether femoral tunnel was created at less than 80° of knee flexion (group A) or 80° or more (group B). RESULTS: There were 32 patients in group A and 16 patients in group B, respectively. Average knee flexion angle was 77.2° [standard deviation (SD) 1.6] in group A and 83.6° (SD 2.4) in group B, respectively (p < 0.05). Average Distance-E was 5.1 mm (SD 2.6) in group A and 6.6 mm (SD 3.8) in group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the femoral and tibial tunnel position between group A and B. Femoral graft bending angle was significantly smaller in group A [average angle: 50.9° (SD 6.6)] than in group B [average angle: 55.0° (SD 6.6)] (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical femoral tunnel was able to be created at less than 80° of knee flexion in two-thirds of patients. Shallower flexion angle (less than 80°) provided gentler femoral graft bending angle compared to 80° or more of knee flexion. Therefore, femoral tunnel creation in modified transtibial technique should be started at between 75° and 80° of knee flexion to reduce femoral graft bending angle. Shallow knee flexion angle during femoral tunnel creation using modified transtibial technique can reduce femoral graft bending angle and may lead to better clinical outcomes in ACL reconstruction. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the results of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction after the failure of primary ACL double bundle reconstruction (ACL-DBR). METHODS: Twenty-two knees in 22 patients (group R) that underwent ACL revision surgery using bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft after the failure of primary ACL-DBR were included in this study. Intraoperative findings and postoperative knee laxity and clinical outcomes in group R were assessed. Forty-four knees in 44 patients that were age- and gender- matched with group R and underwent primary ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft were used as a control group (group P). RESULTS: The incidence of medial meniscus and cartilage injury in group R was significantly higher than those in group P (p < 0.05). At final follow-up, median Lysholm score was 90.5 (64-100) in group R and 94 (59-100) in group P, respectively. Fourteen patients (63.6%) in group R and 31 patients (70.5%) in group P were able to return to previously-played sports, respectively. There were no significant differences in KT-1000 outcomes (2.0 mm in group R and 1.4 mm in group P) or pivot shift test between the two groups. The rate of subsequent ACL injury was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Revision ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft after failed primary ACL-DBR provided almost compatible postoperative clinical outcomes and knee stability with primary ACL reconstruction using BTB autograft, while the incidence of medial meniscus and cartilage injury at revision surgery was higher. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Relationship between femoral tunnel location and graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal technique for ACL double bundle reconstruction in 3D-CT study.

INTRODUCTION: In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, sharp angulation of the graft at tunnel aperture increases local strain to the graft. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between femoral tunnel location and femoral graft bending angle after ACL double bundle reconstruction (ACL-DBR) with two different drilling techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In ACL-DBR, femoral tunnel was created by two techniques; outside-in technique (26 patients, group A) and transportal technique (25 patients, group B). CT scan was taken at 1 week postoperatively. The position of femoral tunnel exit on the lateral femoral cortex, and intra-articular femoral and tibial tunnel aperture of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and postero-lateral bundle (PLB) was measured using a rectangular frame on three-dimensional CT images. Femoral graft bending angle was measured using two-dimensional CT images. RESULTS: Femoral tunnel exits of AMB and PLB in group A were significantly anterior and proximal than those in group B (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in intra-articular femoral and tibial tunnel apertures between group A and B. A mean femoral graft bending angle of AMB was 80.3° in group A and 69.2 degrees in group B, respectively (p < 0.05). A mean femoral graft bending angle of PLB was 66.3° in group A and 64.6° in group B, respectively. In both groups, a significant (p < 0.05) correlation (r < -0.4) was observed between the position of the femoral tunnel exit (anterior-posterior ratio from femoral anterior border line) and the femoral graft bending angle in AMB. CONCLUSIONS: Since the femoral tunnel exit in outside-in technique was located more anterior and proximal, femoral graft bending angle of AMB in outside-in technique was greater than that in transportal technique. Anterior position of the femoral tunnel exit in AMB increased femoral graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal techniques.

Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication after anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction (ACL-DBR) with two drilling techniques by transparent 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and elucidate the factors associated with post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication. METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent ACL-DBR using outside-in technique (Group A, 25 patients) and transportal technique (Group B, 30 patients) for the drilling of femoral tunnel. CT was taken at 1 week and 6 months post-operatively. The femoral and tibial bone tunnel orientation, position, the divergency and the distance of bone bridge between the tunnels were measured using reconstructed CT images. In order to identify the factors related to post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication, patients were divided into two groups depending on whether femoral bone tunnels communicated (Group F-C) or remained (Group F-R) at 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Femoral bone tunnels in Group B were orientated horizontally and dorsally compared to those in Group A. Tunnel divergency between two femoral tunnels was greater in Group A (11.7°) than in Group B (10.0°). Average distance of bone bridge at 1 week post-operatively was 1.8 mm in Group A and 1.7 mm in Group B (n.s.). Post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication occurred in 16 patients (64 %) in Group A and in 18 patients (60 %) in Group B at 6 months after ACL-DBR, respectively (n.s.). Regarding tibial tunnels, there were no significant differences in tunnel orientation, position, divergency and incidence of post-operative tibial tunnel communication between Groups A and B. Mean distance of femoral bone bridge at 1 week in Group F-R (2.5 mm) was significantly greater than in Group F-C (1.3 mm) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-operative femoral tunnel communication between two techniques. To avoid post-operative femoral tunnel bone communication, more than 2 mm distance of bone bridge at surgery is recommended.

Analyses of associated factors with concomitant meniscal injury and irreparable meniscal tear at primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young patients.

Purpose: Although several factors related to the concomitant meniscal injury at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) have been investigated in a general population, few studies have identified the risk factors of meniscal tear severity in young patients in which the majority of ACL tears occur. The purpose of this study was to analyze the associated factors with meniscal injury and irreparable meniscal tear and the timeline for medial meniscal injury at ACL-R in young patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of young patients (13 to 29 years of age) who underwent ACL-R by a single surgeon from 2005 to 2017 was conducted. Predictor variables (age, sex,body mass index [BMI], time from injury to surgery [TS], and pre-injury Tegner activity level) for meniscal injury and irreparable meniscal tear were analyzed with multivariate logistic. Results: Four hundred and seventy-three consecutive patients with an average of 31.2 months post-operative follow-up were enrolled in this study. The risk factors for medial meniscus injury were TS (<= 3 months) (odds ratio [OR], 3.915; 95% CI, 2.630-5.827; P < .0001) and higher BMI (OR, 1.062; 95% CI, 1.002-1.125; P = 0.0439). The presence of irreparable medial meniscal tears correlated with higher BMI (OR, 1.104; 95% CI, 1.011-1.205; P = 0.0281). Conclusion: An increased time from ACL tear to surgery of 3 months was strongly associated with an increased risk of medial meniscus injury, but not related to irreparable medial meniscal tear at primary ACL reconstruction in young patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Risk Factors Related to the Presence of Meniscal Injury and Irreparable Meniscal Tear at Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have attempted to identify risk factors associated with irreparable meniscal tears at anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to describe follow-up data, such as the failure rate, after meniscal repair. PURPOSE: To investigate the associations of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), time to surgery (TTS), and preinjury Tegner score with the presence of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears at primary ACLR. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on 784 patients who underwent primary ACLR by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2017 (406 men and 378 women; mean age, 25.8 years; mean BMI, 23.1; median TTS, 3 months; median preinjury Tegner score, 7). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean postoperative follow-up, 33.0 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the association of patient variables with the presence of meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears during primary ACLR. RESULTS: The risk factor for medial meniscal injuries was TTS ≥3 months (odds ratio [OR], 4.213; 95% CI, 3.104-5.719; P < .001). The presence of irreparable medial meniscal tears increased with older age (OR, 1.053; 95% CI, 1.024-1.084; P < .001), higher BMI (OR, 1.077; 95% CI, 1.003-1.156; P = .042), and TTS ≥3 months (OR, 1.794; 95% CI, 1.046-3.078; P = .034). On multivariate analysis, none of the variables were significantly associated with lateral meniscal injuries and irreparable meniscal tears. The failure rate, defined as patients who needed additional medial meniscal surgery after medial meniscal repair, was 4.6%. CONCLUSION: Time from ACL injury to reconstruction of ≥3 months was strongly associated with medial meniscal injuries and irreparable medial meniscal tears at primary ACLR. Older age and increased BMI were also risk factors for the presence of irreparable medial meniscal tears at ACLR.