Onset psychosis and PTSS after severe respiratory symptomatology caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection: a case report.

Covid-19 is an infective respiratory illness caused by a novel virus, which might present different degrees of severity: from mild or even asymptomatic carriers to severe pneumonia, requiring intubation and intensive care unit (ICU) management. SARS-CoV-2 may cause also central nervous system involvement, including psychiatric manifestations. Some cases of psychosis apparently covid-related have been reported since the start of the pandemic; we will briefly review some of them here, then we will report a case concerning a patient with emerging psychosis during the disease caused by the virus. Our case describes a man with no prior personal or familiar psychiatric history, who developed delusion and a post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) which required hospitalization in a psychiatric unit. The patient was treated with antipsychotic medications and underwent a brief follow-up.

Consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions to general hospital psychiatric wards in Italy: Reduced psychiatric hospitalizations and increased suicidality.

AIMS: The present investigation aimed at evaluating differences in psychiatric hospitalizations in Italy during and after the lockdown due to the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared to the same periods in 2018 and 2019. METHODS: We obtained and analyzed anonymized data on psychiatric admissions (n = 4550) from 12 general hospital psychiatric wards (GHPWs) in different Italian regions (catchment area = 3.71 millions of inhabitants). Using a mixed-effects Poisson regression model, we compared admission characteristics across three periods: (a) March 1-June 30, 2018 and 2019; (b) March 1-April 30, 2020 (i.e., lockdown); and (c) May 1-June 30, 2020 (i.e., post-lockdown). RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a 41% reduction (IRR = 0.59; p < 0.001, CI: 0.45-0.79) in psychiatric admissions in the enrolled GHPWs with respect to the 2018 and 2019 control period. Conversely, admission rates in the post-lockdown period were similar to those observed in the control period. Notably, a consistent and significant reduction in psychiatric hospitalizations of older patients (aged >65 years) was observed in the lockdown (40%; IRR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.44-0.82) and post-lockdown (28%; IRR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.96) periods. Long-stay admissions (>14 days) increased (63%; IRR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.32-2.02) during the lockdown and decreased by 39% thereafter (IRR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.49-0.75). A significant 35% increase in patients reporting suicidal ideation was observed in the post-lockdown period, compared to the rate observed in the 2018 and 2019 control period (IRR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.01-1.79). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 lockdown was associated with changes in the number of psychiatric admissions, particularly for older patients and long-stay hospitalizations. Increased admission of patients reporting suicidal ideation in the post-lockdown period merits special attention. Further studies are required to gain insight into the observed phenomena.

[Cognitive-Behavioural group interventions and Multifamily Psychoanalysis group in a Psychiatric Ward]. / Interventi cognitivo-comportamentali di gruppo e psicoanalisi multifamiliare di gruppo in un Servizio Psichiatrico di Diagnosi e Cura.

AIM: This paper aims to study, evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two group interventions within a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The outcome indicators of the satisfaction of patients and their families with the ward were evaluated with a Satisfaction Questionnaire on the department, and their satisfaction with the groups were evaluated with the Satisfaction Questionnaire for the groups. The two theoretical orientations examined are the cognitive-behavioural therapy, with group cognitive-behavioural intervention in the context of SPDC, and psychoanalysis, with multifamily psychoanalysis groups, according to the model of Jorge García Badaracco. METHODS: The sample is composed of 83 users (42 males and 41 females) participating in the groups; 41 users (23 males and 18 females) not participating in the groups; 54 family members participating in the groups; 41 family members not participating in the groups. RESULTS: The results show an improvement of satisfaction with activities compared to the hospitalisation into the ward (p<.01), an improvement in the perception of the ward climate (p<.01) of the users participating in the groups, regardless of the orientation of reference, but it shows a greater effectiveness of groups with cognitive-behavioral group orientation (p<.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a greater effectiveness of the groups with cognitive-behavioural orientation, but confirm that psychotherapeutic groups in psychiatric contexts, even in emergency, not only seems to be well accepted and perceived positively by users and family members, but it also contributes to increasing satisfaction with the ward.