Mantle Cell Lymphoma: the Role of Risk-Adapted Therapy and Treatment of Relapsed Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, the current treatment strategies are recapped, evolving agents are discussed, and we provide guidance in treating R/R MCL. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been an advancement in treatment using targeted therapy, cellular therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and novel therapeutic agents including non-covalent BTKis, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates for treatment of refractory and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell lymphoma that is associated with a poor prognosis. Current treatments include immunochemotherapy, chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) which place patients in remission but result in relapse. Chemoimmunotherapy uses chemotherapeutic agents paired with rituximab in patients who have chemo-sensitive disease with prolonged remission of at least > 2 years and/or have contraindications to chemotherapy that serve as bridges to more definitive treatment. Additional therapies including proteosome inhibitor-based therapies and immunomodulators, like bortezomib and lenalidomide, can be used as single agents or in combination with others. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors including ibrutinib, acalaburtinib, and zanubrutinib have also been proven effective for the treatment of (R/R) disease. Another agent is Venetoclax, a robust drug that can be used in MCL after progression or intolerance to BTKi. Newer advances in the management of MCL have led to the utilization of cellular therapies including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and SCT that are options for healthy young (< 65 years old) who have progressed through several lines of therapies. With progression of disease, mutations are acquired that cause therapy resistance. Novel therapeutic agents such as non-covalent BTKis, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates are paving the way for advancements in treatment for R/R MCL. R/R MCL is a complex disease with many therapeutic options none of which has been proven superior in head-to-head comparison. In this review, the current treatment strategies are recapped, evolving agents are discussed, and we provide guidance in treating R/R MCL.

Racial and ethnic variation in multigene panel testing in a cohort of BRCA1/2-negative individuals who had genetic testing in a large urban comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: There is sparse clinical information on the racial and ethnic distribution of results of multigene panel testing among individuals at high risk for hereditary cancer. METHODS: We evaluated the results of multigene panel testing across eight clinical sites across the state of Michigan for individuals seen for genetic counseling from May 13, 2013 to October 31, 2019 at the Karmanos Cancer Institute's cancer genetics clinic. We estimated the prevalence of pathogenic variants and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) from genes other than BRCA1/2 among individuals of non-Hispanic White (NHW), Black or African American (AA), Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ), Arab, Hispanic, and other ancestry. RESULTS: The racial and ethnic distribution of 2419 individuals who had panel testing included 68.8% NHW, 22.1% AA, 2.3% Arab, 2.2% AJ, 1.0% Hispanic, and 3.6% other. Of these, 11.2% had pathogenic variants and 17.5% had VUS. After multivariable analyses, compared to NHW, AA were less likely to have pathogenic variants (OR 95% CI, 0.38, 0.24-0.59, p < 0.001). Both AA and Arabs were more likely to have VUS (OR 95% CI, 1.53, 1.18-1.98, p = 0.001 and OR 95% CI, 2.28, 1.17-4.43, p = 0.015, respectively). There were no significant differences for other groups. The most common pathogenic variants were CHEK2 (n = 65), MUTYH (n = 45), ATM (n = 28), and MSH2 (n = 22); the most common pathogenic variants by race and ethnicity were CHEK2 (NHW), MSH2 and MUTYH (AA), MSH2 (Arab), MSH6 and CHEK2 (AJ), and MLH1 (Hispanic); the most common pathogenic variants by primary cancer site were CHEK2 (breast), MSH2 (colon), BRIP1 and MUTYH (ovarian), and MSH2 and MSH6 (endometrial). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the racial and ethnic distribution of pathogenic variants in multi-gene panels has the potential to lead to better identification of individuals at risk for hereditary cancer.

Mortality and prognostic factors in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cancer: an analysis from a large healthcare system in the United States.

Background: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with malignancy who are SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) positive and investigate if factors such as age, gender, and race contribute to COVID-19 mortality in patients with malignancy. Methods: Retrospective data was gathered from Memorial Healthcare System of COVID-19 patients hospitalized from March 1, 2020 to January 18, 2021. Active malignancy was defined as either receiving antineoplastic therapy or being under surveillance. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics and outcomes. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis were performed to define baseline clinical characteristics potentially associated with mortality in cancer patients with COVID-19. Results: A total of 4,870 COVID-19 patients were enrolled in the study, and 265 of those patients had a diagnosis of active malignancy. The study population was diverse which included non-Hispanic whites (NHW) 816 (16.8%), Hispanics 2,271 (46.6%) and Blacks 1,534 (31.5%). Of the cancer patients, 24.1% were NHW, 43% were Hispanic and 28.7% were Black. Amongst the races, 37.5% of in-hospital mortalities were NHW, while 18.4% were Hispanics and 19.7% were Black. The in-hospital mortalities amongst the two malignancy types, solid and hematological, accounted for 24.6% and 23.5% of deaths and they were not found to be statistically significant (P=0.845). After adjustments for age, gender and race were made, cancer was independently associated with an increased in-hospital mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-2.01]. Increased age and elevated serum levels of creatinine and C-reactive protein (CRP) were associated with an increased risk of death in cancer patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: COVID-19 in patients with cancer had poorer outcomes in comparison to those who were cancer-free. Both hematological and solid malignancies had similar in-hospital mortality rates. The highest in-hospital mortalities of cancer patients with COVID-19 were non-Hispanic whites in-comparison to Hispanics with the least. Age, elevated levels of creatinine and CRP were independently associated with increased risk of death in cancer patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The findings indicate the need for close surveillance and monitoring of these patients as they are more likely to have higher risk of death from COVID-19.