No relationship between osteoprotegerin concentrations and endothelial dysfunction in non-obese women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationships of osteoprotegerin (OPG) concentrations to brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and the carotid artery intima media thickness (CIMT) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Thirty-seven women with PCOS and 41 controls matched for body mass index (BMI) and age were included in study. The serum OPG concentrations, hormonal and metabolic profiles were measured in women with PCOS and in control group. The CIMT and brachial artery FMD were evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: The mean serum concentrations of all hormones were comparable, except LH, which was higher in women with PCOS. Lipid parameters were similar between groups. There were no differences between groups with respect to fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c and HOMA-IR. The mean osteoprotogerin concentrations were higher in PCOS group (11.39 ± 2.29 vs. 10.22 ± 2.25 pmol/L, P = 0.026). The mean CIMT was higher in PCOS group than control group (0.52 ± 0.058 vs. 0.45 ± 0.059 mm, P < 0.01). The mean brachial artery FMD was lower in PCOS group (0.068 ± 0.022 vs. 0.055 ± 0.029, P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: We found high osteoprotogerin concentrations, increased CIMT and decreased FMD, in women with PCOS. However, there was no correlation between osteoprotegerin and cardiovascular risk markers.

Assessment of impaired glucose tolerance prevalence with hemoglobin A1c and oral glucose tolerance test in 252 Turkish women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective, controlled study.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the prevalence of abnormalities in glucose metabolism in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and controls in a Turkish population? SUMMARY ANSWER: The total prevalence of glucose abnormalities in PCOS patients was 16.3% [impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) 14.3%; type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) 2%] and was higher than in healthy subjects (IGT 8.5%; T2DM 0%, respectively). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: One of the most common markers of chronic glycemia is hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c). However, little is known about whether the use of HbA1c results in diagnosis of more cases of glucose intolerance in the PCOS population than the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) alone. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective study, including 252 women with PCOS and 117 control women without PCOS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was carried out in the gynecological outpatient department of Namik Kemal University Hospital, Turkey, between 2010 and 2012. Women with PCOS (n = 252) were diagnosed according to Rotterdam criteria. The control group included 117 women (aged 17-45 years) who were selected randomly. BMI of participants ranged between 15.6 and 47.9 kg/m(2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Patients with PCOS were comparable to controls in terms of age (24.8 versus 25.9 years, respectively) and had higher BMI (26.1 versus 24.9 kg/m(2), respectively). Of 252 patients with PCOS, 41 had glucose intolerance (IGT 14.3%; T2DM 2%) when compared with 10 of the 117 control patients (IGT 8.5%; T2DM 0%; odds ratios = 2.08; P = 0.045) during the OGTT. When an HbA1c value ≥ 5.6% was used to divide the total population, the prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism was 7.9% in the patients with PCOS, below the value detected in the control patients (8.5%), which showed that 20 of 41 patients with abnormal glucose tolerance would not have been diagnosed, if the HbA1c alone had been used. When compared with the OGTT results, HbA1c provided 52.4% sensitivity, 74.4% specificity, 67.1% positive and 60.9% negative predictive values with a threshold value of 5.6% in abnormal glucose tolerance. The receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested a threshold value of 5.35% in HbA1c (75.6% sensitivity and 52.6% specificity) for the prediction of abnormal glucose tolerance. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study did not involve weight-matched healthy subjects, which may cause a difference in prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism between the groups, and the results are limited to an unselected population of patients who have the full PCOS phenotype. In addition, the incidence of T2DM among the first-degree relatives and 2-h insulin levels could not be reported in full. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Further investigation of the efficacy of HbA1c for the prediction of abnormal glucose tolerance should be undertaken in long-term prospective studies and in different geographic populations. At present, the only way to reliably detect abnormal glucose metabolism in Turkish women with PCOS appears to be using the OGTT. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No financial support. The authors have no competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Outcome of intrauterine pregnancies with intrauterine device in place and effects of device location on prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the outcome of pregnancies with retained or removed intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the effect of IUD location on pregnancy outcome. STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective cohort study, we searched 27,578 records of women who had CuT380 IUD inserted, and 144 pregnancies with IUD were analyzed. IUDs were removed from 114 patients and retained for 30 patients. RESULTS: The combined risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm birth and preterm premature rupture of membranes) was 36.8% in the IUD-removed group and 63.3% in the IUD-retained group [p<.01; relative risk (RR)=2.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-3.3]. Newborns of the IUD-retained women had significantly lower Apgar scores and significantly higher admission rate to the neonatal intensive care unit (p=.01; RR=10.8; 95% CI 1.04-111.6 and p<.01; RR=4.5; 95% CI 1.5-12.9, respectively). There were more miscarriages and adverse pregnancy outcome when the IUD was retained (16.9% vs. 66.7%) in patients with an IUD in low-lying position (p<.01; RR=3.9; 95% CI 1.8-8.6). CONCLUSION: Women who conceived with an IUD in place and chose to continue the pregnancy without removing the IUD need close follow-up, as there appears to be higher risk of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcome. Furthermore, when the IUD is retained in the low-lying position, there is increased risk of miscarriage and adverse pregnancy outcome compared to removal of the IUD. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to determine the outcome of pregnancies with retained or removed IUD. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, we have evaluated the IUD location and its effect on pregnancy outcome in women with a retained or removed IUD. This study is the first to investigate the relationship between IUD location and pregnancy outcome in women who conceived with an IUD. We need evidence from a collaborative multicenter randomized trial to answer the question of whether the IUD should be removed in case of pregnancy.

Protective effect of infliximab on ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat ovary model: biochemical and histopathologic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of infliximab on experimentally induced ovarian ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRi). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 42 female rats were equally divided into 6 experimental groups; group 1: sham operation, group 2: 3-h ischemia, group 3 and 4: 3-h ischemia, 3-h reperfusion, group 5 and 6: 3-h ischemia, 24h reperfusion. In group 4 and group 6, 30 min before reperfusion, infliximab was administered intraperitoneally at a dose of 5mg/kg. Bilateral ovaries were removed for histopathologic and biochemical analysis. Serum MDA (sMDA), tissue MDA (tMDA), serum NO (sNO), tissue NO (tNO) and serum catalase concentrations were analyzed. Tissue damage of ovarian tissue was scored by histological examination. RESULTS: The infliximab administration significantly lowered the sNO, tNO and sMDA concentrations in group 4 compared to group 3 (p=0.041, p=0.025 and p=0.035, respectively). sNO, tNO and sMDA concentrations were also lower in group 6 when compared to group 5, but this differences were not significant (p>0.05). On the other hand, tMDA concentrations were lower in infliximab-applied groups when compared to ischemia/reperfusion groups (group 3 vs. 4 and 5 vs. 6) (p=0.045 and p=0.048, respectively). Moreover, histopathologic tissue damage scores in infliximab administration groups were significantly lower than in ischemia/reperfusion groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Infliximab attenuates I/R-induced ovarian tissue injury in rats subjected to ischemia/reperfusion.