Are patients with GBA-Parkinson disease good candidates for deep brain stimulation? A longitudinal multicentric study on a large Italian cohort.

BACKGROUND: GBA variants increase the risk of developing Parkinson disease (PD) and influence its outcome. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a recognised therapeutic option for advanced PD. Data on DBS long-term outcome in GBA carriers are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the impact of GBA variants on long-term DBS outcome in a large Italian cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively recruited a multicentric Italian DBS-PD cohort and assessed: (1) GBA prevalence; (2) pre-DBS clinical features; and (3) outcomes of motor, cognitive and other non-motor features up to 5 years post-DBS. RESULTS: We included 365 patients with PD, of whom 73 (20%) carried GBA variants. 5-year follow-up data were available for 173 PD, including 32 mutated subjects. GBA-PD had an earlier onset and were younger at DBS than non-GBA-PD. They also had shorter disease duration, higher occurrence of dyskinesias and orthostatic hypotension symptoms.At post-DBS, both groups showed marked motor improvement, a significant reduction of fluctuations, dyskinesias and impulsive-compulsive disorders (ICD) and low occurrence of most complications. Only cognitive scores worsened significantly faster in GBA-PD after 3 years. Overt dementia was diagnosed in 11% non-GBA-PD and 25% GBA-PD at 5-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of long-term impact of GBA variants in a large Italian DBS-PD cohort supported the role of DBS surgery as a valid therapeutic strategy in GBA-PD, with long-term benefit on motor performance and ICD. Despite the selective worsening of cognitive scores since 3 years post-DBS, the majority of GBA-PD had not developed dementia at 5-year follow-up.

Functional Study of SNCA p.V15A Variant: Further Linking α-Synuclein and Glucocerebrosidase.

BACKGROUND: SNCA p.V15A was reported in five families. In vitro models showed increased aggregation and seeding activity, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis. Mutant flies had reduced flying ability and survival. OBJECTIVES: To clinically and functionally evaluate SNCA p.V15A in a large Italian family with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: Genetic diagnosis was reached through next-generation sequencing. Pathogenicity was assessed by molecular dynamics simulation and biochemical studies on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). RESULTS: Five siblings carried SNCA p.V15A; three developed bradykinetic-rigid PD in their 50s with rapid motor progression and variable cognitive impairment. A fourth sibling had isolated mood disturbance, whereas the fifth was still unaffected at age 47. The mutant protein showed decreased stability and an unstable folded structure. Proband's PBMCs showed elevated total and phosphorylated α-synuclein (α-syn) levels and significantly reduced glucocerebrosidase activity. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates accumulation of α-synV15A in PBMCs and strengthens the link between α-syn pathophysiology and glucocerebrosidase dysfunction. © 2024 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Serum Neurofilament Light Chain in Replication Factor Complex Subunit 1 CANVAS and Disease Spectrum.

BACKGROUND: Biallelic intronic AAGGG repeat expansions in the replication factor complex subunit 1 (RFC1) gene were identified as the leading cause of cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome. Patients exhibit significant clinical heterogeneity and variable disease course, but no potential biomarker has been identified to date. OBJECTIVES: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, we aimed to evaluate neurofilament light (NfL) chain serum levels in a cohort of RFC1 disease patients and to correlate NfL serum concentrations with clinical phenotype and disease severity. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with genetically confirmed RFC1 disease and 48 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled from six neurological centers. Serum NfL concentration was measured using the single molecule array assay technique. RESULTS: Serum NfL concentration was significantly higher in patients with RFC1 disease compared to age- and-sex-matched HCs (P < 0.0001). NfL level showed a moderate correlation with age in both HCs (r = 0.4353, P = 0.0020) and patients (r = 0.4092, P = 0.0011). Mean NfL concentration appeared to be significantly higher in patients with cerebellar involvement compared to patients without cerebellar dysfunction (27.88 vs. 21.84 pg/mL, P = 0.0081). The association between cerebellar involvement and NfL remained significant after controlling for age and sex (ß = 0.260, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Serum NfL levels are significantly higher in patients with RFC1 disease compared to HCs and correlate with cerebellar involvement. Longitudinal studies are warranted to assess its change over time.

Diagnostic accuracy of voluntary and stimulated neuromuscular jitter studies in ocular myasthenia gravis.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: There is a lack of studies comparing the accuracy of neuromuscular jitter analysis during voluntary activation (v-jitter study) versus axonal stimulation (s-jitter study). The study aimed to compare these two techniques in the same population of patients with suspected ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). METHODS: Fourteen control subjects (mean age: 55.5 ± 15.2 years) and 34 patients with suspected OMG (mean age: 59 ± 13.9 years) were prospectively evaluated. Twenty spike pairs and 30 individual spikes were analyzed during v-jitter and s-jitter study, respectively. Two different criteria for abnormal individual jitter values were evaluated: ≥ or > than 10% values exceeding the upper normal limit. RESULTS: OMG was diagnosed in 19 patients based on clinical and laboratory findings, without considering jitter measurements. In most patients, v-jitter and s-jitter analyses provided comparable results. The maximum sensitivity (89%) was achieved with s-jitter study using the ≥10% criterion, while the maximum specificity (93%) was found with v-jitter study using the >10% criterion. DISCUSSION: Both v-jitter and s-jitter studies showed good to very good accuracy for the diagnosis of OMG, in the absence of any statistically significant difference. Therefore, the patient's cooperation level and examiner's experience should guide the choice of performing v-jitter or s-jitter analysis in patients with suspected OMG.

High-frequency episodic migraine: Time for its recognition as a migraine subtype?

BACKGROUND: High-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) has gained attention in the field of headache research and clinical practice. In this narrative review, we analyzed the available literature to assess the evidence that could help decide whether HFEM may represent a distinct clinical and/or biological entity within the migraine spectrum. METHODS: The output of the literature search included 61 papers that were allocated to one of the following topics: (i) socio-demographic features and burden; (ii) clinical and therapeutic aspects; (iii) pathophysiology; and (iv) classification. RESULTS: Multiple features differentiate subjects with HFEM from low-frequency episodic migraine and from chronic migraine: education, employment rates, quality of life, disability and psychiatric comorbidities load. Some evidence also suggests that HFEM bears a specific profile of activation of cortical and spinal pain-related pathways, possibly related to maladaptive plasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with HFEM bear a distinctive clinical and socio-demographic profile within the episodic migraine group, with a higher disease burden and an increased risk of transitioning to chronic migraine. Recognizing HFEM as a distinct entity is an opportunity for the better understanding of migraine and the spectrum of frequency with which it can manifest, as well as for stimulating further research and more adequate public health approaches.

Migraine is the most disabling neurological disease among children and adolescents, and second after stroke among adults: A call to action.

The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study is pivotal in shaping health policies by providing comprehensive data on mortality and disability. An updated GBD2021 analysis, published in Lancet Neurology on 14 March 2024, expands the scope of neurological disorders to include 37 conditions, revealing their significant impact on global health. Neurological disorders affect 3.4 billion people, or 43.1% of the global population, making them the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in 2021, with an 18.2% increase since 1990. The top three causes of DALYs in this category are stroke, neonatal encephalopathy and migraine. Migraine, affecting 1.16 billion people, ranks first among children and adolescents and second among adults aged under 60 years. Despite its substantial impact, migraine often lacks proper attention because of its non-fatal nature, invisibility and historical neglect of neurological disorders. The International Headache Society calls for recognizing migraine as a serious medical condition, promoting research and integrating migraine management into public health strategies. Effective interventions include raising awareness, improving access to treatment, adding migraine to the epidemiological surveillance agenda and exploring new treatment strategies. A coordinated effort among stakeholders is essential to alleviate the burden of migraine on individuals and society.

Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of pharmacological preventive treatment for persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Persistent headache attributed to traumatic injury to the head is divided into two subtypes, one attributed to moderate or severe traumatic injury and another attributed to mild traumatic injury (i.e., concussion). The latter is much more prevalent, in part because more than 90% of cases with traumatic brain injury are classified as mild. The pathophysiology of persistent post-traumatic headache is poorly understood and the underlying mechanisms are likely multifactorial. There is currently no approved treatment specifically for persistent post-traumatic headache, and management strategies rely on medications used for migraine or tension-type headache. Therefore, high-quality trials are urgently needed to support clinical decision-making and optimize management strategies. International guidelines can facilitate appropriate trial design and ensure the acquisition of high-quality data evaluating the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of available and novel pharmacological therapies for the preventive treatment of persistent post-traumatic headache. METHODS: The development of this guideline was based on a literature review of available studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, along with a review of previously published guidelines for controlled trials of preventive treatment for episodic and chronic migraine. The identified literature was critically appraised, and due to the scarcity of scientific evidence, recommendations were primarily based on the consensus of experts in the field. OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines for designing state-of-the-art controlled clinical trials aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of preventive treatments for persistent post-traumatic headache attributed to mild traumatic brain injury.

Comparative efficacy, quality of life, safety, and tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant in migraine prevention: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis.

BACKGROUND: Comparative evaluations of preventive migraine treatments can help inform clinical decision making for managing migraine in clinical practice. METHODS: An anchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis was conducted using pooled participant-level data from two phase 3 atogepant trials (ADVANCE and PROGRESS) and one phase 2/3 rimegepant trial (BHV3000-305) to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety/tolerability of atogepant and rimegepant as preventive migraine treatments. Participants receiving atogepant 60 mg once daily, rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet 75 mg once every other day, and placebo were included. Only participants meeting the BHV3000-305 inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed: ≥6 monthly migraine days and ≤18 monthly headache days at baseline. The primary efficacy assessment of interest was change in monthly migraine days across weeks 1-12. RESULTS: There were 252 participants in the atogepant group and 348 in the rimegepant group. Across weeks 1-12, atogepant 60 mg demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in mean monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg (mean difference [95% CI]: -1.65 [-2.49, -0.81]; p < 0.001). Both atogepant and rimegepant demonstrated similar safety/tolerability profiles. CONCLUSION: In this matching-adjusted indirect comparison analysis, oral atogepant 60 mg once daily demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in monthly migraine days compared with rimegepant 75 mg orally disintegrating tablet once every other day.

International Headache Society global practice recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve migraine management around the world, the International Headache Society (IHS) has here developed a list of practical recommendations for the acute pharmacological treatment of migraine. The recommendations are categorized into optimal and essential, in order to provide treatment options for all possible settings, including those with limited access to migraine medications. METHODS: An IHS steering committee developed a list of clinical questions based on practical issues in the management of migraine. A selected group of international senior and junior headache experts developed the recommendations, following expert consensus and the review of available national and international headache guidelines and guidance documents. Following the initial search, a bibliography of twenty-one national and international guidelines was created and reviewed by the working group. RESULTS: A total of seventeen questions addressing different aspects of acute migraine treatment have been outlined. For each of them we provide an optimal recommendation, to be used whenever possible, and an essential recommendation to be used when the optimal level cannot be attained. CONCLUSION: Adoption of these international recommendations will improve the quality of acute migraine treatment around the world, even where pharmacological options remain limited.

Sumatriptan-naproxen sodium in migraine: A review.

BACKGROUND: Varied responses to acute migraine medications have been observed, with over one-third (34.5%) of patients reporting insufficient headache relief. Sumatriptan-naproxen sodium, a single, fixed-dose combination tablet comprising sumatriptan 85 mg and naproxen sodium 500 mg, was developed with the rationale of targeting multiple putative mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of migraine to optimise acute migraine care. METHODS: A narrative review of clinical trials investigating sumatriptan-naproxen sodium for both adults and adolescents was performed in March 2024. RESULTS: Across a total of 14 clinical trials in nine publications, sumatriptan-naproxen sodium offered greater efficacy for 2-h pain freedom (14/14) and sustained pain-free response up to 24 h (13/14) compared with monotherapy and/or placebo for both adult and adolescent study participants with an acceptable and well-tolerated adverse effect profile. Clinical trial data also demonstrates the effectiveness of sumatriptan-naproxen sodium in participants with allodynia, probable migraine, menstrual-related migraine and those with poor responses to acute, non-specific, migraine medication. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-mechanistic therapeutic agents offer an opportunity to optimise acute medications by targeting multiple mediators involved in the pathogenesis of migraine. Sumatriptan-naproxen sodium resulted in greater initial and sustained pain freedom, compared with either sumatriptan, naproxen-sodium and/or placebo, for the treatment of single or multiple attacks of migraine across both adult and adolescent study populations.

Association of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide with other monoclonal antibodies for different diseases: A multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although there is extensive evidence about the safety of monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAbs) in combination with traditional drugs, scarce data are available on the safety of their combination with other mAbs. This study aimed to evaluate the 6-month effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in combination with other mAbs for different diseases. METHODS: Patients included in the Italian Headache Registry and treated concomitantly with an anti-CGRP mAb and another mAb were included. Effectiveness outcomes for migraine included reduction from baseline of monthly headache days (MHDs), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, and Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included. In 27 patients (71.1%), the anti-CGRP mAb was added to a previously ongoing mAb. Nine patients (23.7%) discontinued one of the two mAbs before the end of treatment (seven discontinued the anti-CGRP mAb and two the other mAb). One patient discontinued for AEs. Anti-CGRP mAbs were discontinued due to ineffectiveness (n = 5, 55.5%) and one each (11.1%) for clinical remission and lost to follow-up. MHDs significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months (p < 0.0001) and 6 months (p < 0.001), as did the MIDAS and the HIT-6 scores at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.001). For anti-CGRP mAbs, 27.4% of patients reported PGIC ≥ 5 at 3 months and 48.3% at 6 months. Mild AEs associated with introduction of a second mAb were detected in six patients (15.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, anti-CGRP mAbs showed safety and effectiveness when administered concomitantly with other mAbs.

The headache research priorities: Research goals from the American Headache Society and an international multistakeholder expert group.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and disseminate research priorities for the headache field that should be areas of research focus during the next 10 years. BACKGROUND: Establishing research priorities helps focus and synergize the work of headache investigators, allowing them to reach the most important research goals more efficiently and completely. METHODS: The Headache Research Priorities organizing and executive committees and working group chairs led a multistakeholder and international group of experts to develop headache research priorities. The research priorities were developed and reviewed by clinicians, scientists, people with headache, representatives from headache organizations, health-care industry representatives, and the public. Priorities were revised and finalized after receiving feedback from members of the research priorities working groups and after a public comment period. RESULTS: Twenty-five research priorities across eight categories were identified: human models, animal models, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management, treatment, inequities and disparities, research workforce development, and quality of life. The priorities address research models and methods, development and optimization of outcome measures and endpoints, pain and non-pain symptoms of primary and secondary headaches, investigations into mechanisms underlying headache attacks and chronification of headache disorders, treatment optimization, research workforce recruitment, development, expansion, and support, and inequities and disparities in the headache field. The priorities are focused enough that they help to guide headache research and broad enough that they are widely applicable to multiple headache types and various research methods. CONCLUSIONS: These research priorities serve as guidance for headache investigators when planning their research studies and as benchmarks by which the headache field can measure its progress over time. These priorities will need updating as research goals are met and new priorities arise.

The first interim analysis of Italian patients enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the reimbursement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including fremanezumab, in patients with a Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score ≥ 11, with prescription renewals for up to 12 months in patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score at Months 3 and 6. In this sub-analysis of the Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) study, we provide real-world data on fremanezumab use in Italian routine clinical practice (EUPAS35111). METHODS: This first interim analysis for Italy was conducted when 300 enrolled adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine (EM, CM) completed 6 months of treatment with fremanezumab. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) across the 6 months post-fremanezumab initiation. Secondary endpoints include: proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score at Months 3 and 6, and mean change from baseline across Months 1-6 in MMD and headache-related disability. Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) reported. RESULTS: Of 354 patients enrolled at Italian centers, 318 (EM, 35.5%, CM, 64.5%) were included in the effectiveness analysis. Of patients with available data, 109 (61.2%) achieved the primary endpoint. 61.0% and 65.1% achieved ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs at Months 3 and 6, respectively; 79.9% and 81.0% experienced ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS at the same timepoints. CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab was effective and well-tolerated over the first 6 months of treatment, with approximately 80% of patients meeting Italian criteria for treatment continuation at Months 3 and 6.

Lack of association between TRPV1 gene polymorphisms and risk of migraine chronification: a case-control study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm a previously reported association of TRPV1 rs8065080 with the risk of transformation from episodic (EM) to chronic migraine (CM) and to extend knowledge about the role of other TRPV1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we first investigated the impact of three TRPV1 SNPs (rs8065080, rs222747 and rs222749) on the risk of migraine chronification in a case-control study. A systematic review and meta-analysis were then conducted to summarize the accumulated findings. METHODS: Genotyping of the selected TRPV1 SNPs was performed using TaqMan real-time PCR in 167 EM and 182 CM participants. Crude and adjusted odds ratios with associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the log-additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, and OpenGrey until February 2024. RESULTS: In our case-control study, no association was found between TRPV1 SNPs and the risk of migraine chronification, both in the unadjusted logistic regression models and after adjustment for confounding clinical variables. The results of the meta-analysis with a total of 241 participants with EM and 223 with CM confirmed no association between TRPV1 SNPs and the risk of migraine chronification in any of the genetic models tested. CONCLUSION: The results of the present case-control study and meta-analysis exclude a major role of TRPV1 rs8065080, rs222747, and rs222749 as risk factors for migraine chronification. However, further research is needed to investigate the gene-gene and gene-environment interactions of TRPV1 SNPs on the risk of transformation from episodic to chronic migraine.

Differences in Trunk Acceleration-Derived Gait Indexes in Stroke Subjects with and without Stroke-Induced Immunosuppression.

Background: Stroke-induced immunosuppression (SII) represents a negative rehabilitative prognostic factor associated with poor motor performance at discharge from a neurorehabilitation unit (NRB). This study aims to evaluate the association between SII and gait impairment at NRB admission. Methods: Forty-six stroke patients (65.4 ± 15.8 years, 28 males) and 42 healthy subjects (HS), matched for age, sex, and gait speed, underwent gait analysis using an inertial measurement unit at the lumbar level. Stroke patients were divided into two groups: (i) the SII group was defined using a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 5, and (ii) the immunocompetent (IC) group. Harmonic ratio (HR) and short-term largest Lyapunov's exponent (sLLE) were calculated as measures of gait symmetry and stability, respectively. Results: Out of 46 patients, 14 (30.4%) had SII. HR was higher in HS when compared to SII and IC groups (p < 0.01). HR values were lower in SII when compared to IC subjects (p < 0.01). sLLE was lower in HS when compared to SII and IC groups in the vertical and medio-lateral planes (p ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). sLLE in the medio-lateral plane was higher in SII when compared to IC subjects (p = 0.04). Conclusions: SII individuals are characterized by a pronounced asymmetric gait and a more impaired dynamic gait stability. Our findings underline the importance of devising tailored rehabilitation programs in patients with SII. Further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes and the role of other clinical features on gait pattern.

A Narrative Review of Intestinal Microbiota's Impact on Migraine with Psychopathologies.

Migraine is a common and debilitating neurological disorder characterized by the recurrent attack of pulsating headaches typically localized on one side of the head associated with other disabling symptoms, such as nausea, increased sensitivity to light, sound and smell and mood changes. Various clinical factors, including the excessive use of migraine medication, inadequate acute treatment and stressful events, can contribute to the worsening of the condition, which may evolve to chronic migraine, that is, a headache present on >15 days/month for at least 3 months. Chronic migraine is frequently associated with various comorbidities, including anxiety and mood disorders, particularly depression, which complicate the prognosis, response to treatment and overall clinical outcomes. Emerging research indicates a connection between alterations in the composition of the gut microbiota and mental health conditions, particularly anxiety and depression, which are considered disorders of the gut-brain axis. This underscores the potential of modulating the gut microbiota as a new avenue for managing these conditions. In this context, it is interesting to investigate whether migraine, particularly in its chronic form, exhibits a dysbiosis profile similar to that observed in individuals with anxiety and depression. This could pave the way for interventions aimed at modulating the gut microbiota for treating difficult-to-manage migraines.

Peripheral Endocannabinoid Components and Lipid Plasma Levels in Patients with Resistant Migraine and Co-Morbid Personality and Psychological Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Resistant migraine characterizes those patients who have failed at least three classes of migraine prophylaxis. These difficult-to-treat patients are likely to be characterized by a high prevalence of psychological disturbances. A dysfunction of the endocannabinoid system (ECS), including alteration in the levels of endocannabinoid congeners, may underlie several psychiatric disorders and the pathogenesis of migraines. Here we explored whether the peripheral gene expression of major components of the ECS and the plasma levels of endocannabinoids and related lipids are associated with psychological disorders in resistant migraine. Fifty-one patients (age = 46.0 ± 11.7) with resistant migraine received a comprehensive psychological evaluation according to the DSM-5 criteria. Among the patients, 61% had personality disorders (PD) and 61% had mood disorders (MD). Several associations were found between these psychological disorders and peripheral ECS alterations. Lower plasma levels of palmitoiletanolamide (PEA) were found in the PD group compared with the non-PD group. The MD group was characterized by lower mRNA levels of diacylglycerol lipase α (DAGLα) and CB2 (cannabinoid-2) receptor. The results suggest the existence of peripheral dysfunction in some components of the ECS and an alteration in plasma levels of PEA in patients with resistant migraine and mood or personality disorders.

Intranasal administration of recombinant human BDNF as a potential therapy for some primary headaches.

BACKGROUND: In addition to its critical role in neurogenesis, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) modulates pain and depressive behaviors. METHODS: In a translational perspective, we tested the anti-migraine activity of highly purified and characterized recombinant human BDNF (rhBDNF) in an animal model of cephalic pain based on the chronic and intermittent NTG administration (five total injections over nine days), used to mimic recurrence of attacks over a given period. To achieve this, we assessed the effects of two doses of rhBDNF (40 and 80 µg/kg) administered intranasally to adult male Sprague-Dawley rats, on trigeminal hyperalgesia (by orofacial formalin test), gene expression (by rt-PCR) of neuropeptides and inflammatory cytokines in specific areas of the brain related to migraine pain. Serum levels of CGRP, PACAP, and VIP (by ELISA) were also evaluated. The effects of rhBDNF were compared with those of sumatriptan (5 mg/kg i.p), administered 1 h before the last NTG administration. RESULTS: Both doses of rhBDNF significantly reduced NTG-induced nocifensive behavior in Phase II of the orofacial formalin test. The anti-hyperalgesic effect of intranasal high-dose rhBDNF administration in the NTG-treated animals was associated with a significant modulation of mRNA levels of neuropeptides (CGRP, PACAP, VIP) and cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-10) in the trigeminal ganglion, medulla-pons, and hypothalamic area. Of note, the effects of rhBNDF treatment were comparable to those induced by the administration of sumatriptan. rhBDNF administration at both doses significantly reduced serum levels of PACAP, while the higher dose also significantly reduced serum levels of VIP. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that intranasal rhBDNF has the potential to be a safe, non-invasive and effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of primary headache, particularly migraine.

Expression of miR-155 in monocytes of people with migraine: association with phenotype, disease severity and inflammatory profile.

BACKGROUND: miR-155 is involved in the generation and maintenance of inflammation and pain, endothelial function and immune system homeostasis, all functions that are relevant for migraine. The present study aims to assess the levels of miR-155 in migraine subtypes (episodic and chronic) in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, controlled, study involving three study groups: I) episodic migraine (n = 52, EM), II) chronic migraine with medication overuse (n = 44, CM-MO), and III) healthy controls (n = 32, HCs). We assessed the interictal gene expression levels of miR-155, IL-1ß, TNF-α, and IL-10 in peripheral blood monocytes using rtPCR. The monocytic differentiation toward the M1 (pro-inflammatory) or M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes was assessed in circulating monocytes with flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting. RESULTS: miR-155 gene expression was higher in CM-MO group (2.68 ± 2.47 Relative Quantification - RQ) when compared to EM group (1.46 ± 0.85 RQ, p = 0.006) and HCs (0.44 ± 0.18 RQ, p = 0.001). In addition, miR-155 gene expression was higher in EM group when compared to HCs (p = 0.001). A multivariate analysis confirmed the difference between EM and CM-MO groups after correction for age, sex, smoking habit, preventive treatment, aura, presence of psychiatric or other pain conditions. We found higher gene expression of IL-1ß, TNF-α, and lower gene expression of IL-10 in migraine participants when compared to HCs (p = 0.001 for all comparisons). TNF-α and IL-10 genes alterations were more prominent in CM-MO when compared to EM participants (p = 0.001). miR-155 positively correlated with IL-1ß (p = 0.001) and TNF-α (p = 0.001) expression levels. Finally, in people with CM-MO, we described an up-regulated percentage of events in both M1 and M2 monocytic profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows for the first time a specific profile of activation of miR-155 gene expression levels in monocytes of selected migraine subpopulations, more pronounced in subjects with CM-MO. Interestingly, mir-155 expression correlated with markers of activation of the inflammatory and immune systems. The CM-MO subpopulation showed a peculiar increase of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory monocytes which worths further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov . (NCT05891808).

The World Health Organization Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders and the headache revolution: from headache burden to a global action plan for headache disorders.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Intersectoral Global Action Plan on Epilepsy and Other Neurological Disorders was developed by WHO to address the worldwide challenges and gaps in provision of care and services for people with epilepsy and other neurological disorders and to ensure a comprehensive, coordinated response across sectors to the burden of neurologic diseases and to promote brain health across life-course. Headache disorders constitute the second most burdensome of all neurological diseases after stroke, but the first if young and midlife adults are taken into account. Despite the availability of a range of treatments, disability associated with headache disorders, and with migraine, remains very high. In addition, there are inequalities between high-income and low and middle income countries in access to medical care. In line with several brain health initiatives following the WHOiGAP resolution, herein we tailor the main pillars of the action plan to headache disorders: (1) raising policy prioritization and strengthen governance; (2) providing effective, timely and responsive diagnosis, treatment and care; (3) implementing strategies for promotion and prevention; (4) fostering research and innovation and strengthen information systems. Specific targets for future policy actions are proposed. The Global Action Plan triggered a revolution in neurology, not only by increasing public awareness of brain disorders and brain health but also by boosting the number of neurologists in training, raising research funding and making neurology a public health priority for policy makers. Reducing the burden of headache disorders will not only improve the quality of life and wellbeing of people with headache but also reduce the burden of neurological disorders increasing global brain health and, thus, global population health.