Volumetric evaluation of fat resorption after breast lipofilling.

INTRODUCTION: The fat transfer or the lipofilling is a technique that had a major impact on the breast surgery results. We have been using this technique since 1998 as an adjuvant in breast reconstruction. The transferred fat is partially resorbed in the first three months after fat grafting. Literature shows that fat resorption varies from 30 to 80% and the experimental studies register a variation between 50 and 90%. The difficulty of the lipomodeling consists in anticipating the fat resorption rate in order to obtain breast symmetry. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the resorption rate of the transferred fat in the reconstructed breast by means of volumetric imaging 3 months after fat grafting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective study was undertaken including breast reconstructions with total autologous latissimus dorsi. All the surgical procedures have been done by the same surgeon (1st author). It focused on the second stage of breast reconstruction: the lipofilling. We registered the average harvested volumes, the volumes obtained after centrifugation and the transferred volumes for every reconstructed breast. The intramuscular volume in the reconstructed breast was measured by volumetric imaging on the third day after lipofilling (D3) and three months after lipofilling (M3). The volumetry was performed by using an after treatment console SIEMENS (SOMATOM definition AS 2*64 barettes). The average intramuscular volume was registered at D3 and M3. The average volume difference was calculated in order to obtain the exact resorption rate. RESULTS: This prospective study was undertaken on 32 reconstructed breasts by total autologous latissimus dorsi flap. The average age was 52 years, the average BMI was 24.7 kg/m(2). The average harvested fat volume for the breast lipofilling was 560 cc and the volume obtained after centrifugation was evaluated at about 371 cc, the average fat volume transferred being 291 cc. The volumetric study showed that intramuscular volume at D3 was measured at 284 cc and at M3 about 223 cc, of a resorption intramuscular rate of 21.5%. CONCLUSION: In our study, the rate of resorption of the fat transferred to the muscle in the reconstructed breast was measured at 21.5%. The low resorption rate found in our study, lower than those in the literature, sustains the supposition that the muscle is an excellent receiving matrix for the fat tissue. In order to obtain this percentage, a learning curve is necessary. Once acquired, this technique produces a major improvement of the breast surgery results.

Accuracy of core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of osteosarcoma: A retrospective analysis of 73 patients.

PURPOSE: The goals of this retrospective study were to evaluate the accuracy of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of osteosarcoma and to identify criteria that may predict failed CNB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2002 to 2012, 73patients with a total of 73osteosarcomas underwent CNB. Patients demographics and procedure details were recorded, including tumor size, tumor characteristics (hemorrhagic or not, lytic, sclerotic [>50% bone condensation], or mixed), the type of anesthesia, the number of tissue samples, the size of the biopsy needle and pathology report. Procedures were analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: A diagnosis was not made in 5/73patients (6.8%) with an overall sensitivity of 93.1%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 99.9%. No complications due to CNB were observed. No criteria were identified as predictors of CNB failure. CONCLUSION: Even in the presence of sclerotic tumors, CNB should be the first line diagnostic test for suspected osteosarcomas, pending performance by a well-trained radiologist and reading by a specialized pathologist. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

[Comparison of 3T dacryo-MRI by instillation with dacryo-CT scan for evaluation of epiphora]. / Comparaison de la dacryoIRM 3T par instillation au dacryoscanner dans le cadre du larmoiement chronique.

OBJECTIVES: Epiphora is frequently related to stenosis of the lacrimal drainage pathways. In the evaluation of stenosis, dacryo-CT scan remains the gold standard, despite the need for radiation and catheterization of the lacrimal passages. Evaluation by high field 3T MRI compared to the gold standard in the morphological study of the lacrimal passages and quantification of the stenosis is attractive considering the lack of radiation and non-invasive nature of the technique. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were included, including 9 with bilateral epiphora, representing 33 pathological drainage systems out of 48. Twenty-three drainage systems underwent subsequent surgery (18 patients, 5 patients bilaterally). RESULTS: The average diameter on CT scan images of the superior canaliculus was 0.70 mm (± 0.46), of the inferior canaliculus 0.69 (±0.42), the common canaliculus 0.68 (± 0.58), the lacrimal sac 4.32 (± 2.10), and the nasolacrimal duct 1.15 mm (±1.42). 3T dacryo-MRI overestimated the diameters by 0.35 to 1mm (up to 20 % of the lacrimal sac size), and the concordance between dacryo-CT scan and 3T dacryo-MRI was of average value (kappa 0.5, P<0.05) concerning the diagnosis of stenosis. Furthermore, dacryo-CT scan demonstrated higher sensitivity (72.7 %) than 3T dacryo-MRI (42.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: The two techniques are not equivalent in the diagnosis of stenosis. An optimization of protocols and an evaluation on a larger cohort remain necessary before dacryo-CT scan can be replaced by dacryo-MRI in routine practice.