Coexistence of IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG in a Patient with Progressive Brainstem Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: The coexistence of IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG is rare. Previous reports have shown that patients with IgLON5-IgG spectrum disease present with sleep disorders, bulbar involvement, and autonomic abnormality, while SOX1-IgG positive patients present with peripheral nervous system symptoms such as the Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS). CASE REPORT: We report a patient who presented with progressive ophthalmoplegia, ptosis, oropharyngeal dysphagia, gait instability, and sleep disorders. The paraneoplastic antibody screening tested doublepositive for IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG. However, there was no clinical sign of LEMS in this patient. After extensive cancer screening, only lung nodules with hilar adenopathy were noted. CONCLUSION: The coexistence of IgLON5-IgG with onconeuronal SOX1-IgG would suggest an underlying immune-mediated paraneoplastic process rather than secondary autoimmunity because of neurodegeneration. This is the first IgLON5-IgG case reported in Thailand, with a case of doublepositive IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG as well. Keyword: IgLON5-IgG, SOX1-IgG, Paraneoplastic process, case report.

Preseptal and Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Hemifacial Spasm and Blepharospasm: A 10-Year Comparative Study.

Purpose: Preseptal and pretarsal botulinum toxin injections are approved for treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. However, the long-term data is limited. We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs between preseptal and pretarsal injection in hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. Patients and Methods: The data were retrieved between 2011 and 2021. Consecutive hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm botulinum toxin patients were categorized as preseptal or pretarsal. Study outcomes were the difference in pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale, self-reporting scales, time-related treatment, safety, and cost. Results: Of 152 botulinum toxin-injected patients, 117 (77.0%) patients had hemifacial spasm and 35 (33.0%) patients had blepharospasm. Analysis included data pertinent to 1665 injections in hemifacial spasm (920 preseptal and 745 pretarsal) and 527 injections in blepharospasm (210 preseptal and 317 pretarsal). The difference between pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale was lower in the preseptal group than in the pretarsal group in both hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm (1.5±0.8 vs 1.8±0.6, P-value <0.001 and 1.8±0.8 vs 3.1±0.9, P-value <0.001). There was no difference in duration of maximum response in hemifacial spasm between groups, while the blepharospasm with preseptal had a longer duration than blepharospasm with pretarsal. The preseptal injection was associated with more adverse events overall than the pretarsal (9.4% vs 5.2%, P-value <0.001). The total dose and cost per session in the preseptal group is lower for onabotulinum toxin but higher for abobotulinum toxin. Conclusion: Pretarsal injections reduced symptom severity with fewer side effects. Further studies on the pharmacoeconomics of both techniques are required.

Outcomes of asymptomatic recombinant tissue plasminogen activator associated intracranial hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating complication of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients. Data on rtPA-associated asymptomatic ICH (aICH) are limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, risk factors, characteristics, management, and clinical outcome of rtPA-associated aICH. METHODS: The data were retrieved from the Chiang Mai University Hospital Stroke Registry between 1995 and 2019. Consecutive ischemic stroke patients were included if they were 18 or older and received rtPA. Study outcomes were the incidence and characteristics of aICH, management, 90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Barthel index, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 725 rtPA treated patients, 166 (16.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.4-18.9) had aICH, 50 (6.9%, 95% CI 5.2-9.0) had symptomatic ICH (sICH). Patients with aICH had more hemorrhagic infarctions (HI) compared to sICH (81.9% vs 2.0%, P-value < 0.001). Fresh Frozen Plasma and cryoprecipitate were the most common blood products used to reverse the anticoagulant effect in sICH. Craniotomy was performed in 1% and 60% of patients who had aICH and sICH. At 90 days, patients who had aICH had poorer clinical outcomes (mRS, NIHSS and Barthel index) as compared to those without ICH. Compared to non-ICH patients, aICH patients were associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality, the hazard ratio (HR), 3.7, 95% CI 1.6-8.9. CONCLUSIONS: The rtPA-associated aICH increased the risk of morbidity and mortality outcomes. Further treatment consensus, guideline generation, or clinical trials focusing on the treatment of rtPA-associated aICH may be required.

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonist: Case reports and literature review.

Introduction and importance: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis is an uncommon adverse event in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Case presentation: We reported two cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after eltrombopag administration. The first case is a 29-year-old ITP woman who recently initiated eltrombopag one month before admission. She presented with progressive headache, visual disturbance, and nausea for six days with unremarkable physical examination except for bilateral optic disc edema. She was treated with enoxaparin and switched to edoxaban when discharged. The second case is a 75-year-old man with a history of vaccine-induced ITP. He was initially treated with dexamethasone and eltrombopag. One month later, he developed acute cerebral venous thrombosis with hemorrhagic infarction in the bilateral frontal lobes. Even though he was treated with intravenous heparin, his status was not improved. He received the best supportive care. Discussion: The pathophysiology of TPO-RAs-associated cerebral venous sinus thrombosis remained unclear but might associate with platelet activation. Most cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis occur within two months, thus closed platelet monitoring is important. Conclusion: Careful use and closed monitoring might prevent this event. Indications of initiation and tapering must be considered before TPO-RAs administration. Off-label use may enhance TPO-RA side effects.