24-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® Glaucoma Drainage Device for Refractory Glaucoma.

Purpose: To describe the safety and efficacy of the Ahmed ClearPath® (ACP) 250 mm2 glaucoma drainage device (GDD) in the treatment of refractory primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, noncomparative, single-surgeon, interventional case series of adult patients with medically ± surgically refractory POAG undergoing ACP implantation. Intraocular pressure (IOP), the number of glaucoma medications, and complications were recorded over 24 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes included mean reductions in both IOP and medication use through 24 months, and secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving an IOP between 6 and 19 mmHg, IOP reduction by ≥20%, and reduction by ≥1 medication at last mean follow-up. Results: Twelve eyes of 11 patients (mean age 71.3 ± 14.1 years) fit inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Most patients were Caucasian (n = 8), female (n = 10), and all had severe POAG (n = 11). The mean last follow-up was 18 months, at which time the mean (standard deviation) baseline IOP of 29.0 (7.6) mmHg was reduced to 12.2 (4.0) mmHg (58% reduction). 91.7% of eyes achieved an IOP between 6 and 19 mmHg, and 100% of eyes met an IOP reduction of ≥20%. Mean baseline number of glaucoma medications was 3.0 (0.9) and was reduced to 0.5 (0.7) at last mean follow-up (83.3% reduction), with 91.7% of eyes using ≥1 fewer medications. No long-term complications were observed, and short-term complications (mild hyphema, inflammation, and pain) were resolved by month 3. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the second long-term study evaluating the efficacy of the Ahmed ClearPath drainage device in adult patients, and the first study with 24-months follow-up. The ACP device is safe and effective at reducing both IOP and medication burdens in patients with severe POAG. Additionally, minimal short-term complications were noted with no long-term adverse effects, increasing comfort for both the surgeon and the patient.

Visual field decline and restoration following vitamin A therapy for vitamin A deficiency.

Purpose: To present a case of nutritional vitamin A deficiency (VAD) that caused bilateral severe dry eye symptoms and progressive visual field contraction over a 13.5-month span resulting in peripheral blindness and nyctalopia, and to document the patient's rapid visual field restoration following vitamin A therapy (VAT). Observations: A 34-year-old Haitian woman presented for a glaucoma consultation with the following symptoms in both eyes (OU): painful dry eyes, floaters, nyctalopia, and visual field contraction over eighteen months despite treatment with four anti-glaucoma medications and intraocular pressures (IOP) in the low teens OU. The glaucoma diagnosis was eliminated due to slit lamp examination and OCT imaging, which showed an absence of both optic neuropathy and secondary glaucoma features. The patient's symptoms remained consistent with VAD. The patient's visual field decline was restored with significant documented visual field improvement occurring within only 11 days, and complete visual field restoration within 5.5 months of VAT. Conclusions and Importance: Our case demonstrates the critical role of vitamin A in maintaining ocular health and visual field preservation. To our knowledge, this is the second reported case documenting a patient's visual field decline due to VAD, as well as visual field restoration following enteral VAT. As visual outcomes of VAT are significantly underreported in scientific literature, it is imperative that ophthalmologists are aware of its effects.

Deadbolt cataract due to misplanted minishunt.

A 62-year-old woman with stable unilateral glaucoma in the left eye presented for a cataract consultation. In 2010, laser peripheral iridotomies (LPI) were performed on both eyes by a different provider. Her postoperative course was complicated by a recalcitrant steroid response with a highest intraocular pressure (IOP) of 65 mm Hg in the left eye. A trabeculectomy with a glaucoma minishunt (EX-PRESS, Alcon) was then performed by that provider (Supplemental Figure 1, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A603). Thereafter, IOP control of the left eye was normalized and maintained without topical antiglaucoma medications. Historically, her right eye has been always her better eye. Recently, she noticed metamorphopsia in her left eye. Her ocular history was also notable for high refractive errors requiring continuous spectacles wear, possible mild refractive amblyopia of the left eye, history of submacular choroidal nevus with drusen in the right eye, and an epiretinal membrane (ERM) with macular pucker in the left eye. Her husband is an optician. Both inquire about refractive cataract surgery options to correct astigmatism and presbyopia; both have reservations regarding cost and visual quality associated with diffractive optic intraocular lenses (IOLs). Her deteriorating visual acuity in both eyes affects her ability to work. Her corrected distance visual acuity was 20/40 in both eyes (pinhole, no help) while wearing spectacles according to a prescription of -8.50 diopters (D) +1.50 D × 106 for the right eye and -13.00 D +3.25 D × 057 for the left eye. Her corrected near visual acuity was 14/14 in both eyes with the abovementioned prescription and a +3.00 D add. Central corneal thickness was 618 µm in the right eye and 631 µm in the left eye. IOP was 20 mm Hg in the right eye and 10 mm Hg in the left eye on no antiglaucoma medications. Pertinent findings on slitlamp examination included bilateral dermatochalasis, a shallow diffuse thick bleb superiorly in the left eye only, patent LPI superiorly in both eyes, nuclear sclerotic and cortical cataracts in both eyes (with prominent focal spoke superiorly left eye only) (Figure 1, A-C). Fundus photos show posterior vitreous detachment in both eyes, ERM with macular pucker in the left eye, and submacular choroidal nevus (2.5 × 3.0 disc diameter size) with overlying drusen in the right eye (Supplemental Figure 2, A, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604). Gonioscopy revealed open angles in both eyes, albeit with focal narrowing without synechiae superiorly in the left eye only (Figure 1, D-FJOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202207000-00020/figure1/v/2022-06-24T130746Z/r/image-tiff). Most importantly, however, the distal tip of the minishunt was not positioned as expected in the anterior chamber; rather, it was noted to pierce the peripheral iris near the iris root superiorly. Most of the minishunt shaft and spur were positioned in the posterior chamber with the distal tip penetrating into the superior aspect of the capsular bag and cataract in the left eye-like a deadbolt. Visual field testing showed a full field in the right eye and an inferior nasal step in the left eye (Supplemental Figure 2, B, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604). In addition to slitlamp, gonioscopic, and fundus photos, we also obtained optical coherence tomography of the macula and nerve (Supplemental Figure 2, C, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A604), optical biometry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, endothelial cell counts, and corneal topography (Supplemental Figure 3, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A605). How would you counsel this patient regarding her glaucoma condition, the misplanted minishunt, and her cataract surgery and IOL options? How would you manage the misplanted minishunt? What surgical approaches or specific techniques would you consider for cataract removal and visual rehabilitation?

Endophthalmitis following combined cataract extraction and placement of an iStent trabecular bypass device.

PURPOSE: To report a case of post-operative endophthalmitis following combined cataract extraction and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery with placement of the iStent drainage device. OBSERVATION: An 87-year-old woman with a nuclear sclerotic cataract and primary open angle glaucoma underwent elective phacoemulsification cataract extraction with iStent placement. Surgery was complicated only by the inability to properly place the second iStent despite several attempts. At 4 days post-operatively she was diagnosed with endophthalmitis. Despite the prompt intravitreal injections of broad spectrum antibiotics, she lost all perception of light. Cultures of anterior chamber aspirates failed to identify a causative organism. CONCLUSION AND IMPORTANCE: In what we believe to be the first report of endophthalmitis associated with placement of the iStent, complete loss of vision occurred. Surgeons need to be aware that iStent placement may be complicated by severe endophthalmitis.

What is the risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome?

PURPOSE: To determine the probability of converting from pigment dispersion syndrome to pigmentary glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective community-based study of all newly diagnosed cases of pigment dispersion syndrome or pigmentary glaucoma. METHOD: Subjects were patients newly diagnosed with pigment dispersion syndrome or pigmentary glaucoma from 1976 to 1999 in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Criteria for pigment dispersion syndrome were two of three signs: midperipheral, radial iris transillumination defects; Krukenberg spindle; heavy trabecular meshwork pigmentation. Criteria for pigmentary glaucoma were pigment dispersion syndrome and two of three findings: intraocular pressure (IOP) greater than 21 mm, optic nerve damage, or visual field loss. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine the probability of conversion to pigmentary glaucoma. RESULTS: A total of 113 patients were newly diagnosed with pigment dispersion syndrome over the 24-year period. Of these, 9 persons developed pigmentary glaucoma or elevated IOP requiring therapy. The probability of converting to pigmentary glaucoma was 10% at 5 years and 15% at 15 years. An additional 23 patients were found to have pigmentary glaucoma at their initial examination. The mean age at diagnosis of pigmentary glaucoma was 42 +/- 12 years; 78% of patients were male, whereas 58% of patients with pigmentary dispersion syndrome glaucoma were male. The most significant risk factor for conversion to pigmentary glaucoma was an IOP greater than 21 mm Hg at initial examination, whereas age, refractive error, and family history of glaucoma were not correlated with conversion. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing pigmentary glaucoma from pigment dispersion syndrome was 10% at 5 years and 15% at 15 years. Young, myopic men were most likely to have pigmentary glaucoma. An IOP greater than 21 mm Hg at initial examination was associated with an increased risk of conversion.