A case of myeloid neoplasm associated with eosinophilia and KIAA1509-PDGFRß responsive to combination treatment with imatinib mesylate and prednisolone.

A 41-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea, persistent leucocytosis and eosinophilia for 8 months. High-resolution computed tomography scan and pathology of bronchoalveolar lavage confirmed the diagnosis of hypereosinophilic pneumonitis. The patient was treated with prednisolone (0·5-1 mg/kg/day) for more than 20 weeks under the impression of hypereosinophilic syndrome, but without improvement of leucocytosis and eosinophilia. The bone marrow aspiration smear disclosed hypercellular marrow with myeloid hyperplasia and eosinophilia. The fusion gene detection was positive for KIAA1509-PDGFRß. Myeloid neoplasm associated with eosinophilia and abnormality of PDGFRß was then diagnosed (Tefferi A, Vardiman JW, Leukemia, 22, 2008, 14). The tyrosine kinase inhibitor, imatinib mesylate (Glivec; 200 mg/day), was administered along with prednisolone (0·25-1 mg/kg/day). White blood cell (WBC) count decreased from 49,500/µL to 17,200/µL, and eosinophil count decreased from 1932/µL to 35/µL, which represent percentage dropped from 7·7%> to 0·2%. Withdrawal of prednisolone was done to avoid adverse events. However, absolute eosinophil count increased progressively despite the continue administration of imatinib and negative detection PDGFRß fusion gene. The patient then received combination therapy of imatinib and prednisolone again. WBC and absolute eosinophil were normalized subsequently. We had discontinued the prednisolone one more time, and rebound of eosinophilia was seen again. The phenomenon of rebounding of eosinophilia was observed in two subsequent withdrawals of prednisolone. Either steroid or imatinib mesylate alone failed to achieve complete haematological response. A synergistic effect of imatinib and steroid is postulated.

Impact of Port-A-Cath device management in cancer patients with candidaemia.

This study investigated the impact of management of a totally implantable central venous access port device, Port-A-Cath (Smith Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA), on the outcome of 98 cancer patients with candidaemia. Port-A-Cath retention was found to be significantly associated with poorer outcome, independent of other significant adverse factors [breakthrough candidaemia, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥ 21, and worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (3-4)]. However, retention of Port-A-Cath devices could be considered in patients who do not have definite catheter-related candidaemia, are not using total parenteral nutrition, do not have poor ECOG performance scores or APACHE II scores, and do not have septic shock.