The role of intraoperative ultrasonography in planning the resection of hepatic neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE: Both intraoperative ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography with arterial portography (CTAP) may be used in planning segment-oriented liver resection in patients with primary or secondary hepatic neoplasms. This study was conducted to determine if intraoperative US findings substantially alter surgical plans based on CTAP findings alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with potentially resectable hepatic lesions were considered for the study; judgement as to whether a lesion was resectable was based on a clinical evaluation and CTAP. Over the period Apr. 4, 1991, to Oct. 1, 1993, 24 consecutive patients with hepatic lesions were examined; of these, 22 (13 men and 9 women with a mean age of 60.1 years) underwent US during resection, 1 did not undergo surgery and 1 was found at surgery to have carcinomatosis. The true nature of the lesions was verified pathologically or by follow-up imaging and assays for carcinoembryonic antigen. RESULTS: The surgical plan based on CTAP findings alone was altered by the intraoperative US findings in 9 (41%) of the 22 patients. A total of 60 intrahepatic abnormalities were evaluated: 49 malignant lesions and 11 artifacts. The specificity (100%) and negative predictive value (73.3%) for intraoperative US were significantly greater than for CTAP (specificity of 9.1% and negative predictive value of 14.1%). CONCLUSION: In a substantial proportion of patients undergoing hepatic resection, intraoperative US alters the surgical plan based on CTAP and provides additional specificity in the evaluation of liver lesions. This method of imaging is therefore justified for patients undergoing liver resection.

LGM (Vena Tech) vena cava filter: clinical experience in 64 patients.

LG-Medical (LGM) vena cava filters were inserted percutaneously in 64 patients. Each case was followed after the filter insertion. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients; in 11 patients it was the only form of follow-up. Findings were available from autopsies in seven patients, plain abdominal radiographs in 42, and duplex sonograms of the insertion vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) in 46. A filter was inserted without major complication in all patients. The filter failed to open fully in four patients and was tilted in the IVC in 15. Recurrent pulmonary embolism was found in two patients (fatal in one), and inconsequential filter migration occurred in 11. Introduction vein thrombosis occurred in four patients. IVC thrombosis, demonstrated at autopsy or sonography, was found in 14 patients (22%) and was symptomatic in six (9%). This report suggests that the LGM filter is easy to introduce, and few complications are associated with insertion. The rate of caval thrombosis, however, may be higher than previously reported.