Outcomes with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma without completion lymph node dissection.

Until recently, most patients with sentinel lymph node-positive (SLN+) melanoma underwent a completion lymph node dissection (CLND), as mandated in published trials of adjuvant systemic therapies. Following multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial-II, most patients with SLN+ melanoma no longer undergo a CLND prior to adjuvant systemic therapy. A retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes in SLN+ melanoma patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy after July 2017 was performed in 21 international cancer centers. Of 462 patients who received systemic adjuvant therapy, 326 patients received adjuvant anti-PD-1 without prior immediate (IM) CLND, while 60 underwent IM CLND. With median follow-up of 21 months, 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) was 67% (95% CI 62% to 73%) in the 326 patients. When the patient subgroups who would have been eligible for the two adjuvant anti-PD-1 clinical trials mandating IM CLND were analyzed separately, 24-month RFS rates were 64%, very similar to the RFS rates from those studies. Of these no-CLND patients, those with SLN tumor deposit >1 mm, stage IIIC/D and ulcerated primary had worse RFS. Of the patients who relapsed on adjuvant anti-PD-1, those without IM CLND had a higher rate of relapse in the regional nodal basin than those with IM CLND (46% vs 11%). Therefore, 55% of patients who relapsed without prior CLND underwent surgery including therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND), with 30% relapsing a second time; there was no difference in subsequent relapse between patients who received observation vs secondary adjuvant therapy. Despite the increased frequency of nodal relapses, adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy may be as effective in SLN+ pts who forego IM CLND and salvage surgery with TLND at relapse may be a viable option for these patients.

Soft Tissue Cancer Management: Isolated Limb Infusion for Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of malignancies comprising almost 80 subtypes of bone and soft tissue cancers. Previously, all subtypes were managed identically. Advancements in biological and genetic studies have revealed that sarcoma subtypes display varying characteristics and therefore require tailored treatments. Locally advanced soft tissue malignancies of both the trunk and the extremities can present significant challenges for treatment. At present, a negative surgical resection margin is the only definitive treatment despite attempts to use neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies. In patients with locally advanced non-resectable soft tissue sarcoma (STS), the current practice would advocate amputation. However, studies suggest that limb salvage may be possible with radiotherapy or regional chemotherapy using isolated limb perfusion or isolated limb infusion (ILI). An ideal treatment modality for non-resectable STS would strive for preservation of anatomy and functionality as well as improve quality of life. The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy of isolated limb infusion as an alternative treatment modality for non-resectable locally advanced STS. METHODS: The efficacy of ILI was retrospectively investigated in 10 patients with STS. All patients received ILI with melphalan and actinomycin at the North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia from September 1, 2014 to May 31, 2018. The procedures were performed in a lower extremity in 8 patients and in an upper extremity in 2 patients. The 6-month overall response rate was 78% and the overall limb salvage rate was 100%. The distant metastatis-free survival was longer for responders than for non-responders. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: ILI is an alternative treatment modality for regional disease control and limb preservation in patients with cutaneous and soft tissue malignant neoplasms of the extremities. The short-term response rates are encouraging and the median overall survival shows good results in this highly complex patient population.