Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heliyon ; 9(10): e20331, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37810827

RESUMO

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is an epidemic disease in Thailand. Fluoroquinolones are used to treat TB and have a lengthy treatment course. Therefore, many patients may have adverse effects from these medications. Tendinopathy has been reported as a significant adverse effect of fluoroquinolones. Although the mechanism of tendinopathy from fluoroquinolones is not fully understood, it can progress to a more serious consequence such as a ruptured tendon which can result in morbidity if not treated effectively. Methods: This study was a single-centered, retrospective descriptive study conducted in patients at a tertiary-level university hospital in Thailand. TB patients who received fluoroquinolones for the treatment of TB from January 2017 to December 2019 were enrolled. This study assessed the prevalence, clinical characteristics, treatment, treatment outcomes for fluoroquinolones-associated tendinopathy, and treatment outcomes of TB. Results: During the study period, 184 participants that were diagnosed with TB and used fluoroquinolones were enrolled in the study. 34 (18.5%) participants developed tendinopathy. The risk factors that were associated with fluoroquinolones-associated tendinopathy were younger age (<60 years) (Odd ratio (OR) 3.61; 95% CI 1.16-11.23), female (OR 3.54; 95% CI 1.58-7.90), and prolonged usage of levofloxacin (>180 days) (OR 2.61; 95%CI 1.12-6.08). All participants who developed tendinopathy received conservative treatment; the dose of fluoroquinolones was reduced in 9 (26.4%) participants, fluoroquinolones were discontinued in 7 (20.6%) participants and the rest of the participants (n = 18; 52.9%) had conservative treatment. After conservative treatment, 25 (73.5%) participants recovered from tendinopathy. For the TB treatment, 27 (79.4%) participants in the tendinopathy group completed TB treatment and none of them experienced treatment failure. On the other hand, 89 (59.3%) participants in the no tendinopathy group had completed their TB treatment and 3 (2%) of them experienced treatment failure. Conclusions: The prevalence of fluoroquinolones-associated tendinopathy was not uncommon, and the risk of fluoroquinolones-associated tendinopathy was high in young and female patients. Levofloxacin use was related to an elevated risk of developing tendinopathy, which was dose- and duration-dependent. Conservative treatment, reducing the dose or discontinuation of fluoroquinolones successfully improved the symptoms of tendinopathy. Fluoroquinolones-associated tendinopathy did not affect the treatment of TB.

2.
Vaccine X ; 14: 100334, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37361052

RESUMO

Immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated individuals varies based on the vaccine type, duration after vaccination or infection, and SARS-CoV-2 variant type. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate the immunogenicity of a booster vaccination with AZD1222 after two doses of CoronaVac (booster group) compared to individuals who had SARS-CoV-2 infection after receiving two doses of CoronaVac (infection group). We used a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) to evaluate immunity against wild-type and Omicron variant (BA.1) at 3 and 6 months after infection or booster dose. Of the 89 participants, 41 were in the infection group, and 48 were in the booster group. At 3 months post-infection or booster vaccination, the median (IQR) sVNT against wild-type was 97.87 % (97.57-97.93 %) and 97.65 % (95.38-98.00 %), p = 0.66, respectively, while the sVNT against Omicron was 18.8 % (0-47.10 %) and 24.46 (11.69-35.47 %), p = 0.72 respectively. At 6 months, the median (IQR) sVNT against wild-type was 97.68 % (95.86-97.92 %) in the infection group, higher than 94.7 % (95.38-98.00 %) in the booster group (p = 0.03). Results showed no significant difference in immunity against wild-type and Omicron at 3 months between the two groups. However, the infection group exhibited better immunity than the booster group at 6 months.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa