Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 51(4): 612-621, 2021 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33283234

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of pazopanib in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma in routine clinical use in Japan. METHODS: It was a multicentre, centrally registered and uncontrolled observational study in patients who received pazopanib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, with an observation period of 1 year after the start of drug administration. The study was conducted at 378 investigational sites in Japan from September 2012 to September 2019. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the efficacy endpoints of the study. RESULTS: A total of 1970 patients were enrolled. Of these, 680 with finalized study forms were included in the analysis. Overall, 649 patients were included in the safety analysis set, and 569 were included in the efficacy analysis set. Most of the patients (81.97%) experienced at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR); 22.34% of patients reported serious ADRs and 34.98% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 ADRs in the safety set. Hypertension (40.37%) and hepatic dysfunction (26.50%) were the two most common ADRs. A total of 262 deaths were reported, of which 12 were due to ADRs. The median PFS was 3.09 months, whereas the median OS was not reached at the end of the 1-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles in this postmarketing observational study were consistent with prior data and registration clinical trials. No new safety signals were observed while treating patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with pazopanib.


Assuntos
Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Indazóis , Japão/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinas/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacologia , Sarcoma/epidemiologia , Sarcoma/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/patologia , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Sulfonamidas/efeitos adversos , Sulfonamidas/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 25(10): 1870-1878, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699976

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy for BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable and metastatic melanoma in over 100 Japanese patients of a real-world clinical setting. PATIENTS: The surveillance period of interim post-marketing surveillance (PMS) analysis was from June 2016 to November 2018, and 112 patients with unresectable and metastatic BRAF V600 melanoma who received dabrafenib and trametinib were enrolled. RESULTS: The safety analysis set included 112 patients whom almost all patients had stage IV disease (n = 97, 86.61%) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 (n = 102, 91.07%), and mean (standard deviation) lactate dehydrogenase level was 354.3 (456.4) U/L (n = 105) at baseline. Median daily dose of dabrafenib was 300.0 mg/day (118-300), and median daily dose of trametinib was 2.00 mg/day (1.0-4.0). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 84 patients (75%), and common ADRs (incidence ≥ 5%) were pyrexia (n = 49, 43.75%), hepatic function abnormal (n = 11, 9.82%), rash and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (n = 9 each, 8.04%), and erythema nodosum (n = 6, 5.36%). Majority of ADRs reported in this study were consistent with that reported in previous trials. In the efficacy analysis set of 110 patients, the objective response rate was 55.45% (95% confidence interval 45.67-64.93%), and median progression-free survival was 384.0 days (251.0 days-not reached). CONCLUSIONS: No new safety or efficacy concerns were observed in this interim PMS analysis in Japanese patients with unresectable and metastatic melanoma with BRAF gene mutation who received dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Povo Asiático , Feminino , Febre/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Oximas/administração & dosagem , Gravidez , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Piridonas/administração & dosagem , Pirimidinonas/administração & dosagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Jpn J Infect Dis ; 64(1): 40-9, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21266754

RESUMO

The genetic delivery of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) by in vivo production may offer a new solution to the current problems in the mAb therapy for microbial diseases. Herein, plasmids encoding the neutralizing mAb against hemagglutinin (HA) of A/PR/8/34 influenza virus (IFV) were electro-transferred into mouse muscle and the relationship between serum recombinant anti-HA mAb (rHA mAb) levels and the prophylactic efficacy against lethal IFV infection were analyzed. Pretreatment of the muscle with hyaluronidase before electroporation and gene transfer into 3 muscles resulted in a marked enhancement of the mAb expression. After single gene transfer, peak serum concentrations were reached around 20 days after the gene transfer following sustained expression of >10 µg/ml of rHA mAbs. This level of rHA mAb expression was sufficient to protect all mice against a lethal IFV infection. Furthermore, a significant rHA mAb expression level sufficient to protect the host against lethal IFV infection was maintained for at least 130 days. Passive immune-prophylaxis with gene transfer using the plasmid encoding neutralizing mAbs may therefore provide effective protection against viral infections, including IFV.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Glicoproteínas de Hemaglutininação de Vírus da Influenza/imunologia , Imunização Passiva/métodos , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/prevenção & controle , Plasmídeos/genética , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais/genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/metabolismo , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/genética , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/metabolismo , Quimioprevenção , Eletroporação , Técnicas de Transferência de Genes , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/genética , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A/patogenicidade , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Camundongos , Testes de Neutralização , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/imunologia , Infecções por Orthomyxoviridae/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa