The impact of clean intermittent catheterization on students and families in the school environment.

INTRODUCTION: Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is often used for bladder emptying in children with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Until recently, the emphasis in assessing the effects of CIC has been on preserving kidney function, reducing urinary tract infection, and achieving urinary continence. Few studies have investigated the impact of CIC on students and families in a school setting. This study sought to examine what students and caregivers experienced when CIC was required during the school day and how schools adjusted to a student needing to perform it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phenomenological approach utilizing semistructured interviews was performed to understand the impact of CIC on students. Purposeful sampling identified eligible families. A guide was developed from expert opinion validated by a pilot sample with feedback collated into a family/provider codesigned questionnaire. Interviews emphasized the impact and challenges students faced at school. Transcripts were coded using Dedoose software with emerging themes identified and a code book was created for closed coding that led to thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 families (52 caregivers and children > 12 years) were interviewed. Emergent themes included: Caregivers and students felt (1) school personnel were not always aware of nor prepared regarding the implications of CIC; (2) school bathrooms were often less than ideal (e.g., location, size, cleanliness, privacy, and availability); and (3) student participation in extracurricular activities was challenging. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies potential areas of intervention in meeting the needs of students who require CIC and the importance of having collaborative efforts of caregivers, health care providers, and school personnel in addressing and meeting CIC needs. Care coordination that involves consistent communication and careful planning between health care teams, school personnel, students, and caregivers can optimize a student's educational experience.

Factors contributing to telemedicine efficacy in pediatric urology.

INTRODUCTION: Despite swift implementation of telemedicine with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there is a paucity of research on its use for management of pediatric urology patients. Specifically, there is limited knowledge and inconsistent data on the effectiveness of telemedicine for various pediatric urologic conditions. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of pediatric urological care provided via video visits (VVs) at a large tertiary care children's hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective assessment of pediatric urology patients younger than 21 years who had a VV between 5/18/2022 and 5/17/2023. New patients with a testicular diagnosis were not eligible for VVs. After entering the diagnosis and submitting billing using a modifier for telemedicine, clinicians were mandated to select whether the VV allowed for: complete case management (CCM), suboptimal case management (SCM), or incomplete case management (ICM) requiring an in-person visit. Case management categorizations were analyzed according to patient pathology, visit type (i.e., new or established), and patient-centered variables including age, sex, race, insurance type, need for an interpreter, and distress score [a proxy for socioeconomic status]. RESULTS: During the one-year period, there were 3267 telemedicine patients with a median age of 9 years (IQR 3-13) and 57.0% were male. Most VVs (89.3%) were established encounters. Almost 12% of telemedicine patients had external organ pathology (EOP, e.g., phimosis), 43.0% had internal organ pathology (IOP, e.g., hydronephrosis), and 45.1% had functional urological pathology (FUP, e.g., dysfunctional voiding). Clinicians deemed 96.9%, 2.7%, and 0.5% of VVs as having CCM, SCM or ICM, respectively. Telemedicine patients with IOP or FUP were more likely to have CCM, than those with EOP (98.5% and 97.8% vs 87.1%, p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, patient age, pathology, and visit type were predictive of VV efficacy. DISCUSSION: Now that telemedicine use has slowed, it is necessary to evaluate and establish its optimal role in pediatric urology. Factors associated with VV efficacy included older patient age, internal organ or functional urological pathology, and established encounters. The long-term success of telemedicine requires suitable patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is quite effective for the management of a wide variety of pediatric urology patients. Continued evaluation of telemedicine, including multi-institutional investigation and corroboration, is necessary for the development of evidence-based best practice guidelines regarding appropriate, safe, and effective integration of telemedicine that drives pediatric urological care forward to meet the demands of the future.

Short communication: A pilot study to determine safety and feasibility of a commercial enuresis alarm to detect voiding in infants.

Accurate measurement of post-void residual (PVR) volumes requires accurate determination of the timing of voiding, which is challenging in non-verbal patients. As a proof of principle, we sought to test the feasibility, safety and efficacy of using an enuresis alarm to indicate voiding in ten infants. Each infant was observed for 4 h with alarm in the diaper, and diapers checked every 15-30 min to confirm voiding. The alarm activated in 31 of 33 voids (93.9%). No adverse events occurred. Further work will investigate whether this approach may improve accuracy of PVR measurement.

"We Followed their Lead": Exploring Relational Change and Support among Caregivers of Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth.

Transgender and gender diverse youth and young adults (TGDY) experience higher mental health morbidity, including self-harm, suicide ideation, and suicide attempts, as compared to cisgender peers. Support from family members is associated with improved mental health outcomes for TGDY. However, little is known about the process that caregivers who consider themselves supportive undergo and how caregiver-youth relationships evolve through a TGDY's gender journey. Through a reflexive thematic analysis of 14 interviews conducted with caregivers of TGDY from April-July 2022, we sought to understand how caregivers who considered themselves supportive of TGDY navigated shifting relationships with themselves, their children, and their communities. Applying theories of Ambiguous Loss and Thriving Through Relationships, findings coalesced around several themes including reflecting on change, re-negotiating interpersonal relationships, and educating through relationships. The gender journeys of TGDY required caregivers to navigate relationships with self (feeling loss and wrestling with worry for their child), negotiate relationships with others (disclosing to extended family and social networks), and educate themselves and others through relationships (connecting through personal narratives from other families, parents supporting parents, learning to advocate for their child). The process of caregivers learning to support their children was facilitated through profound intrapersonal and interpersonal reflection, connection, and community. Understanding this process is important to inform educational interventions and programs that help caregivers learn to support and advocate effectively for TGDY.

Characterizing digital access in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND: Virtual medicine has the potential to improve access for underserved populations by facilitating timely remote evaluation. However, challenges in the real-world implementation of this technology may paradoxically exacerbate health disparities. We sought to characterize families' digital access and how social determinants of health may impact virtual medicine access within pediatric urology. We hypothesized that disadvantaged socioeconomic status would be a barrier to virtual medicine access. STUDY DESIGN: A digital access screening tool was prospectively developed and launched in July 2021. Schedulers are prompted to complete this optional screening questionnaire at the time of patient intake, for video or in-person encounters. The parent is screened for access to a device and reliable internet or cellular data that could be used to participate in a video visit. These represented the primary study outcomes. A modality preference for an in-person visit, video visit, or no preference was also recorded. Patient demographics were retrospectively evaluated, and socioeconomic status was estimated using the Distressed Communities Index generated for each patient's zip code. For each zip code, the Distressed Communities Index produces a normalized, comparative distress score ranging from 0 ("prosperous") to 100 ("distressed"). RESULTS: 3885 patients were included, with median age of 5 years (IQR 1-11). Almost 74% were male, 71.3% were White, 20.9% had public insurance, and 2.9% required an interpreter. The median distress score was 14.2 (IQR 7.2-27.5). Screening revealed that 136 families (3.5%) lacked digital access. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, insurance type (p = 0.0020) and distress score (p = 0.0125) were significant predictors of digital access (Summary Table). Those patients who lacked access to a device (p < 0.0001) or reliable internet/cellular data (p < 0.0001) were more likely to prefer an in-person visit. DISCUSSION: Family screening revealed that there is a small but significant proportion of families who lack digital access, and this cohort disproportionately represents underserved communities with higher distress scores, likely reflecting lower socioeconomic status. Those families without digital access were more likely to prefer an in-person visit. Improved identification of these socially complex "at-risk" patients can assist in the development of more inclusive health care strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the chance for virtual medicine to expand access for underserved populations, lack of digital tools may hinder its potential impact on health disparities in pediatric urology. Ongoing digital access screening and further studies are needed to design interventions tailored to the specific needs of our patients, allowing for more equitable pediatric urological care.