Comparison of Triflusal with Aspirin in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events; Α Randomised Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Triflusal has demonstrated an efficacy similar to aspirin in the prevention of vascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (ΜΙ) and ischaemic stroke but with less bleeding events. OBJECTIVE: We performed a randomised, multicentre, phase 4 clinical trial to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of triflusal versus aspirin, administered for 12 months in patients eligible to receive a cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibitor. METHODS: Patients with stable coronary artery disease or with a history of non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke were randomly assigned to receive either triflusal 300 mg twice or 600 mg once daily or aspirin 100 mg once daily for 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of: (a) ΜΙ, (b) stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic), or, (c) death from vascular causes for the entire follow-up period. The primary safety endpoints were the rate of bleeding events as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, an equivalent result was revealed between the triflusal (n=559) and aspirin (n=560) in primary efficacy endpoint. Specifically, the combined efficacy outcome rate (i.e. MI, stroke or death from vascular causes) difference was equal to -1.3% (95% confidence interval -1.1 to 3.5) and lied within the a-priori defined equivalence interval (p<0.001). Regarding the primary safety endpoints, patients on triflusal treatment were 50% less likely to develop bleeding events according to the BARC criteria, and especially any clinically overt sign of haemorrhage that requires diagnostic studies, hospitalisation or special treatment (BARC type 2). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of triflusal in the secondary prevention of vascular events is similar to aspirin when administered for 12 months. Importantly, triflusal significantly reduced the incidence of ΜΙ and showed a better safety profile compared with aspirin. (ASpirin versus Triflusal for Event Reduction In Atherothrombosis Secondary prevention, ASTERIAS trial; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02616497).

Salts of Clopidogrel: Investigation to Ensure Clinical Equivalence: A 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the present clinical trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of the generic clopidogrel besylate (CB) with the innovator clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate (CHS) salt in patients eligible to receive clopidogrel. METHODS: A prospective 2-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. Consecutive patients (n = 1864) were screened and 1800 were enrolled in the trial and randomized to CHS or CB. Primary efficacy end point was the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from vascular causes, and primary safety end point was rate of bleeding events as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: At 12-month follow-up, no differences were observed between CB (n = 759) and CHS (n = 798) in primary efficacy and safety end points (age, sex, history of percutaneous coronary intervention adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.21 and OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.51-1.29, respectively) between CHS and CB. Analyses of efficacy and safety in subgroups that were defined according to the qualifying diagnosis revealed that there was no difference between CHS and CB. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of CB administered for 12 months for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events are similar to that of CHS. (Salts of Clopidogrel: Investigation to ENsure Clinical Equivalence, SCIENCE trial; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02126982).

Generic Clopidogrel Besylate in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events: A 6-month Follow-up of a Randomised Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present interim analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of the generic clopidogrel besylate (CB) with the innovator clopidogrel hydrogen sulphate (CHS) salt in patient groups eligible to receive clopidogrel. METHODS: A 2-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 4 clinical trial. Consecutive patients (n=1,864) were screened and 1,800 were enrolled in the trial and randomized to CHS (n=759) or CB (n=798). Primary efficacy end point was the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke or death from vascular causes, and primary safety end point was rate of bleeding events as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. RESULTS: At 6-months follow-up no differences were observed between CB and CHS in primary efficacy end point (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.71; p=0.57). Rates of BARC-1,-2,-3a and -5b bleeding were similar between the two study groups whereas no bleeding events according to BARC-3b, -3c, -4 and -5a were observed in either CHS or CB group. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy and safety of the generic CB is similar to that of the innovator CHS salt, thus, it can be routinely used in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events for a period of at least 6 months. (Salts of Clopidogrel: Investigation to ENsure Clinical Equivalence, SCIENCE study Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02126982).

C-reactive protein and multiple complex coronary artery plaques in patients with primary unstable angina.

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible association of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels with the presence of angiographically multiple complex lesions (CLs) in patients with primary unstable angina (PUA). For the purpose of this study, 228 consecutive patients with PUA who underwent in-hospital catheterization were evaluated. Plasma CRP levels were measured upon patients' admission. Coronary plaques were classified as CL or non-CL according to Ambrose's criteria. There were 100 (43.9%) patients with no or one CL (/=2). Tertiles of plasma CRP levels upon admission were significantly associated with the number of CLs on angiographic studies. In particular there was a significant gradual increase in either the number of CLs, or the presence of apparently thrombus-containing CLs with increasing of CRP tertiles. By multivariate analysis CRP was independently associated with the presence of either multiple CLs (R.R.=1.8, 95%CI=1.5-2.2, P<0.001), or angiographically apparent thrombus-containing CLs (R.R.=1.4, 95%CI=1.2-1.7, P=0.03).High plasma levels of CRP may reflect a multifocal activation of the coronary tree in patients with PUA. This finding suggests a generalized inflammatory reaction throughout the coronary tree in these patients.

Serologic markers of persistent Chlamydia pneumonia infection and long-term prognosis after successful coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown an incremental role of inflammation in late prognosis following coronary stenting (CS). In particular, high preprocedural levels of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) have been related to increased hazard of late ischemic complications. Persistent Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cp) infection, detected by positive IgA anti-Cp titers, may be associated with this inflammatory process and portend a high risk of late adverse prognosis after CS. METHODS: A total of 483 consecutive patients with either stable or unstable coronary syndromes were followed-up for 1 year after successful CS. The composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, rehospitalization for rest-unstable angina, and exertional angina, whichever occurred first, was the clinical end point. Additionally, the rate of in-stent restenosis and progression of coronary artery disease during this period were evaluated. Anti-Cp titers and plasma CRP levels were measured before the procedure. RESULTS: Positive immunoglobulin A (IgA), but not positive immunoglobulin G (IgG), titers were significantly associated with high plasma CRP levels in patients with unstable coronary syndromes (P =.005), but not in those with stable angina (P =.7). Moreover, positive IgA titers were significantly related to increased risk of both the composite clinical end point (P =.04) and progression of coronary artery disease (P <.001) in patients with unstable coronary syndromes but not in those with stable angina. Neither positive IgA nor positive IgG titers were associated with the rate of in-stent restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Persistent Cp infection may drive an inflammatory response in the coronary vasculature and portends an adverse late outcome after CS in patients with unstable coronary syndromes.