Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 19(2): 228-238, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27717130

RESUMO

AIMS: Since 2005, several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs compared with basal insulins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks' duration comparing GLP-1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed-effect pairwise meta-analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta-analysed. The once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: -0.31% [95% confidence interval -0.42, -0.19], dulaglutide: -0.39% [-0.49, -0.29]) whilst once-daily liraglutide and twice-daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [-0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [-0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP-1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. CONCLUSIONS: Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP-1 RA's, only the once-weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Incretinas/administração & dosagem , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Glicemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Exenatida , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon/análogos & derivados , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas/administração & dosagem , Insulina Detemir/uso terapêutico , Insulina Glargina/uso terapêutico , Insulina de Ação Prolongada/uso terapêutico , Liraglutida/administração & dosagem , Peptídeos/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/administração & dosagem , Peçonhas/administração & dosagem
2.
BMC Pulm Med ; 15: 145, 2015 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26559138

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests pharmacological treatments may impact on overall survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients. Individual clinical trials are rarely powered to detect mortality differences between treatments and may not include all treatment options relevant to healthcare decision makers. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs of COPD treatments reporting mortality; evidence was synthesised using network meta-analysis (NMA). The analysis included 40 RCTs; a quantitative indirect comparison between 14 treatments using data from 55,220 patients was conducted. RESULTS: The analysis reported two treatments reducing all-cause mortality; salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination (SFC) was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in the fixed effects (HR 0.79; 95 % Crl 0.67, 0.94) but not the random effects model (0.79; 0.56, 1.09). Indacaterol was associated with a reduction in mortality versus placebo in fixed (0.28; 0.08 to 0.85) and random effects (0.29; 0.08, 0.89) models. Mean estimates and credible intervals for hazard ratios for indacaterol versus placebo are based on a small number of events; estimates may change when the results of future studies are included. These results were maintained across a variety of assumptions and provide evidence that SFC and indacaterol may lead to improved survival in COPD patients. CONCLUSION: Results of an NMA of COPD treatments suggest that SFC and indacaterol may reduce mortality. Further research is warranted to strengthen this conclusion.


Assuntos
Broncodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Beclometasona/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Álcoois Benzílicos/uso terapêutico , Budesonida/uso terapêutico , Clorobenzenos/uso terapêutico , Ciclopropanos/uso terapêutico , Combinação Fluticasona-Salmeterol/uso terapêutico , Fumarato de Formoterol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Indanos/uso terapêutico , Ipratrópio/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Teofilina/uso terapêutico , Brometo de Tiotrópio/uso terapêutico , Triancinolona/uso terapêutico
3.
Neurol Ther ; 12(2): 371-390, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36609962

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Angiographic vasospasm (VSP), the narrowing of intracranial arteries, is a complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and often results in delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and cerebral infarction. The objective of this systematic review was to summarize the clinical burden of angiographic VSP and its related complications (DCI and cerebral infarction) after aSAH. METHODS: Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were conducted (in January 2021) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of angiographic VSP and its related complications after aSAH. Study outcomes included measures of functional status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS], Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS], extended Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS-E], modified Barthel Index, or the modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), cognitive status (Montreal Cognitive Assessment or the Mini Mental State Exam), clinical events (rebleeding), and mortality. Study selection, data extraction, and qualitative analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of 5704 abstracts reviewed, 110 studies were selected: 20 comparative and 39 regression-based studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, 51 descriptive studies were excluded. Most studies (51) were observational and conducted in a single country (53). The occurrence of angiographic VSP and its related complications after aSAH resulted in significantly poorer functional outcomes in three of nine comparative and 11 of 13 regression-based studies, measured by the mRS, and in five of six comparative and eight of nine regression-based studies, measured by the GOS and GOS-E. Angiographic VSP and its related complications were significantly associated with poor cognitive status in all five regression-based studies. Numerically or significantly higher mortality rates in patients with versus those without angiographic VSP and its related complications were reported in five of ten comparative studies and in eight of nine regression-based studies. Six studies looked at specific VSP populations (e.g., by severity or timing of VSP). CONCLUSION: Patients with angiographic VSP and its related complications often had poor functional, neurological, and cognitive outcomes and reduced odds of survival both in hospital and at follow-up. We estimate that angiographic VSP and its related complications, DCI and cerebral infarction, lead to an approximately threefold higher odds of poor functional and cognitive outcomes, and about a twofold increase in the odds of death.


Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a medical emergency in which an aneurysm, a weakened outpouching of a cerebral blood vessel, ruptures causing bleeding in the subarachnoid space. Components from the bleeding can trigger a process leading to the constriction of cerebral arteries, called angiographic vasospasm. Angiographic vasospasm is a frequent occurrence after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and can also result in delayed cerebral ischemia and cerebral infarction, which can severely impact patients' health. This study summarizes the published literature to describe the clinical burden that patients may experience due to angiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The evidence from these studies emphasizes numerous clinical consequences that patients may experience. These patients may suffer from diminished neurological and intellectual activity, leading to disability and a loss of functional independence in everyday activities. Angiographic vasospasm and its related complications also reduce the chances of survival, both in the hospital and at follow-up. The considerable clinical burden associated with angiographic vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia, and cerebral infarction highlights the importance of their prevention.

4.
Rheumatol Ther ; 9(1): 25-47, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731412

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have evaluated the economic burden of lupus nephritis (LN). The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to assess the economic burden (direct and indirect costs, and healthcare resource utilization [HCRU]) associated with LN, with particular focus on the burden of renal flares and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). METHODS: This SLR (GSK study 213531) was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Searches of the MEDLINE and Embase databases were conducted for English language publications reporting cost or HCRU data in patients with LN (regardless of age or LN histological class) until December 10, 2019. Handsearching of conference proceedings and keyword-based searches in PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were also conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified from 28 publications reporting the cost (n = 19) and HCRU (n = 13) associated with LN. Most studies were from North America (n = 13) and many used administrative claims data (n = 9). LN was associated with substantially higher direct costs (e.g., total annual, hospitalization, and ESKD-related direct costs), total indirect costs, and HCRU (e.g., hospitalization, outpatient services, and medication use) compared with patients without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or non-renal SLE controls. ESKD and dialysis were significant contributors to economic burden. No studies described the cost of renal flares. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus across the 22 studies was that the economic burden of LN is substantial, particularly in active or severe disease, or if there is progression to ESKD. Total direct cost may be underestimated in claims data given the challenges of identifying patients with LN. Further studies are vital to ascertain the cost of renal flares; a renal flare is likely to result in a period of increased HCRU, which could be mitigated by treatments that extend renal remission.

5.
Neurol Ther ; 11(2): 597-620, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35441974

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral vasospasm (VSP) is the leading risk factor of neurological deterioration (i.e., delayed cerebral ischemia [DCI] and cerebral infarction) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) and a cause of morbidity and mortality. The objective of this systematic literature review is to summarize the economic and humanistic burden of VSP and its related complications after aSAH. METHODS: A predefined protocol was designed, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane (in January 2021) to identify studies reporting economic and/or humanistic (i.e., health-related quality of life [HRQoL]) outcomes for patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic VSP after aSAH. Related conferences and additional sources were searched manually. Dual screening, data extraction, and qualitative analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Of 3818 abstracts identified for review, 43 full-text articles representing 42 single studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Most studies (33) were observational; nine were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Economic outcomes were reported in 31 studies, and alongside HRQoL outcomes in 4 studies; 7 studies reported HRQoL outcomes only. Forty studies were conducted in single countries, while only 2 RCTs were conducted in multiple countries. Patients diagnosed with VSP or DCI spent between 2.1 and 7.4 days longer in intensive care and between 4.7 and 17 days longer in hospital (total) compared with patients without VSP or DCI. A significantly higher cost burden of US$33,945 (2021 £26,712) was identified for patients with VSP and £9370 (2021 £13,733) for patients with DCI compared with patients without. Patients with DCI were also disadvantaged by being employed for 62 fewer days (during 24-month follow-up), with an estimated mean cost of £3821 (2021 £5600) for days off work. Poor HRQoL was associated with ≥ 1 days with VSP symptoms (odds ratio [OR]: 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-5.3), symptomatic VSP (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.0-3.6), and DCI (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3-4.2), although this was not consistent across all studies. Symptomatic VSP and DCI were identified as significant risk factors for depressed mood (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.0-4.9) and global cognitive impairment (OR: 2.3) at 12 months, respectively. The severity of VSP was a critical predictor of post-aSAH economic and humanistic burden. Similar trends in economic and humanistic burden were identified in the general aSAH patient population. Study design and patient heterogeneity precluded direct metaanalysis of the results. CONCLUSION: A substantial direct and indirect economic burden is linked to VSP and its related complications after aSAH. Although limited evidence was identified for humanistic burden, these patients seem to suffer from poor HRQoL with long-lasting burden. Overall, there is an urgent need to understand better the concept of "burden of illness" of VSP and its related complications after aSAH.


Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a sudden, life-threatening emergency caused by bleeding in the subarachnoid space between the brain and skull. Vasospasm of the arteries surrounding the hemorrhage occurs in most patients and may lead to permanent brain damage. This study summarizes the published literature to describe the burden that patients may experience due to vasospasm and its related complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, focusing on financial and life quality aspects. We show that the burden of vasospasm, and its related complications, is huge. Patients often experience reduced quality of life due to their poor health and are more likely to suffer from depression and intellectual impairment. There is also a substantial financial burden linked to vasospasm and its related complications, driven by the need for more intensive care, hospitalization, and higher investigative costs associated with the treatment and management of these patients. In addition, days off work and unemployment can cause a substantial indirect financial burden. Our study highlights the need for additional research to understand further the "burden of illness" of vasospasm and its related complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

6.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 25(1): 44-52, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29484779

RESUMO

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: When randomized controlled trial data are limited or unavailable, or to supplement randomized controlled trial evidence, health technology assessment (HTA) agencies may rely on systematic reviews of nonrandomized studies (NRSs) for evidence of the effectiveness of health care interventions. NRS designs may introduce considerable bias into systematic reviews, and several methodologies by which to evaluate this risk of bias are available. This study aimed to identify tools commonly used to assess bias in NRS and determine those recommended by HTA bodies. METHODS: Appraisal tools used in NRS were identified through a targeted search of systematic reviews (January 2013-March 2017; MEDLINE and EMBASE [OVID SP]). Recommendations for the critical appraisal of NRS by expert review groups and HTA bodies were reviewed. RESULTS: From the 686 studies included in the narrative synthesis, 48 critical appraisal tools were identified. Commonly used tools included the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, the methodological index for NRS, and bespoke appraisal tools. Neither the Cochrane Handbook nor the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination recommends a particular instrument for the assessment of risk of bias in NRS, although Cochrane has recently developed their own NRS critical appraisal tool. Among HTA bodies, only the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health recommends use of a specific critical appraisal tool-SIGN 50 (for cohort or case-control studies). Several criteria including reporting, external validity, confounding, and power were examined. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus between HTA groups on the preferred appraisal tool. Reviewers should select from a suite of tools on the basis of the design of studies included in their review.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto , Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados não Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Variações Dependentes do Observador
7.
Melanoma Res ; 29(1): 13-18, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30273234

RESUMO

Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical method used to produce comparable estimates of efficacy across a range of treatments that may not be compared directly within any single trial. NMA feasibility is determined by the comparability of the data and presence of a connected network. In rapidly evolving treatment landscapes, evidence networks can change substantially in a short period of time. We investigate methods to determine the optimum time to conduct or update a NMA based on anticipated available evidence. We report the results of a systematic review conducted in treatment-naive advanced melanoma and compare networks of evidence available at retrospective, current, and prospective time points. For included publications, we compared the primary completion date of trials from clinical trials registries (CTRs) with the date of their first available publication to provide an estimate of publication lag. Using CTRs we were able to produce anticipated networks for future time points based on projected study completion dates and average publication lags which illustrated expansion and strengthening of the initial network. We found that over a snapshot of periods between 2015 and 2018, evidence networks in melanoma changed substantively, adding new comparators and increasing network connectedness. Searching CTRs for ongoing trials demonstrates it is possible to anticipate future networks at a certain time point. Armed with this information, sensible decisions can be made over when best to conduct or update a NMA. Incorporating new and upcoming interventions in a NMA enables presentation of a complete, up-to-date and evolving picture of the evidence.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Metanálise em Rede , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Melanoma/patologia , Prognóstico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Taxa de Sobrevida
8.
Cancers (Basel) ; 10(11)2018 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30388821

RESUMO

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is an aggressive malignancy which accounts for approximately 5⁻10% of all soft-tissue sarcomas. SS has pathologic and genomic characteristics that define it as a distinct subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). STS subtypes continue to be recognized as distinct entities with specific characteristics, including differential chemo-sensitivity. The objective of this study was to conduct a descriptive review of current data on survival outcomes of systemic anti-cancer therapy specific to SS. A systematic literature review was conducted, using a custom search strategy to search EMBASE, Medline and CENTRAL for clinical trials and observational studies reporting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and/or response for cohorts of at least 50 SS patients. We identified 28 studies meeting these criteria, 25 of which were retrospective studies. Only three prospective studies were identified. Survival reports varied widely between studies based on the population, in particular on the disease stage, and reporting was heterogeneous in terms of the time points reported on. For patients with localized disease, reports of five-year PFS ranged from 26% to 80.7% and five-year OS from 40% to 90.7%, whereas five-year OS for patients with metastatic disease was very low at around 10%; and in one case, 0% was reported. Only four of the included publications reported outcomes by type of systemic anti-cancer therapy received. Our study draws attention to the fact that additional prospective studies to better define the most appropriate treatment for SS in all stages and lines of therapy are still needed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa