The impact of shift work on intensive care nurses' lives outside work: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine how shift work affects intensive care nurses' lives outside work. BACKGROUND: Shift work is unavoidable for many nurses. When attempting to minimise negative effects of shift work, it is important to identify areas which affect nurses working shifts. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: A questionnaire survey among Danish intensive care nurses concerning experiences with shift work and family life, spare time activities, sleep and health. RESULTS: A total of 114 nurses (88%) participated. Shift work was found to influence the opportunities for spare time activities, and about 25% of both evening- and night-shift groups found that working shifts sometimes led to social isolation. A total of 58% of nurses working evening shifts sometimes to very often experienced having trouble falling asleep when working shifts. Night-shift workers had a higher percentage of physical and mental symptoms when working shifts compared with evening-shift workers, with mood swings and headaches being the most common. The median score for thriving on working shifts was 8 (IQR 5-9) for evening-shift workers and 8 (IQR 7-9) for night-shift workers (scale 0-10 with 10 being the highest level of thriving). CONCLUSION: Shift workers reported that working shifts had a negative impact on life outside work. Opportunities for participating in spare time activities and difficulties falling asleep after shifts were the main issues for evening-shift workers, whereas physical symptoms such as headaches and mood swings were more dominant among night-shift workers. Despite the negative effects, the participants generally thrived on working shifts. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: By identifying modifiable areas which negatively influence life outside work when working shifts, it will be possible subsequently to plan interventions aimed at decreasing the negative effects. Interventions may include nurses having increased influence on their work schedules and education in sleep hygiene and dietary habits.

Shift work and quality of sleep: effect of working in designed dynamic light.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of designed dynamic light on staff's quality of sleep with regard to sleep efficiency, level of melatonin in saliva, and subjective perceptions of quality of sleep. METHODS: An intervention group working in designed dynamic light was compared with a control group working in ordinary institutional light at two comparable intensive care units (ICUs). The study included examining (1) melatonin profiles obtained from saliva samples, (2) quality of sleep in terms of sleep efficiency, number of awakenings and subjective assessment of sleep through the use of sleep monitors and sleep diaries, and (3) subjective perceptions of well-being, health, and sleep quality using a questionnaire. Light conditions were measured at both locations. RESULTS: A total of 113 nurses (88 %) participated. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding personal characteristics, and no significant differences in total sleep efficiency or melatonin level were found. The intervention group felt more rested (OR 2.03, p = 0.003) and assessed their condition on awakening as better than the control group (OR 2.35, p = 0.001). Intervention-ICU nurses received far more light both during day and evening shifts compared to the control-ICU. CONCLUSIONS: The study found no significant differences in monitored sleep efficiency and melatonin level. Nurses from the intervention-ICU subjectively assessed their sleep as more effective than participants from the control-ICU.