Coaching of patients with an isolated minimally displaced fracture of the radial head immediately increases range of motion.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. INTRODUCTION: Elbow stiffness is the most common adverse event after isolated radial head fractures. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of coaching on elbow motion during the same office visit in patients with such fractures. METHODS: We enrolled 49 adult patients with minimally displaced radial head fractures, within 14 days of injury. After diagnosis, we measured demographics, catastrophic thinking, health anxiety, symptoms of depression, upper extremity-specific symptoms and disability, pain, and elbow and wrist motion. The patient was taught to apply an effective stretch in spite of the pain to limit stiffness, and elbow motion was measured again. RESULTS: With the exception of radial deviation and pronation, motion measures improved slightly but significantly on average immediately after coaching. Elbow flexion improved from 79% (110° ± 22°) of the uninjured side to 88% (122° ± 18°) after coaching (P < .001); elbow extension improved from 71% (29° ± 14°) to 78% (22° ± 15°) (P = .0012). DISCUSSION: Instruction that stretching exercises are healthy even when painful resulted in immediate improvements in motion. Prospective studies comparing different strategies for coaching patients regarding painful stretches might help clarify the optimal approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level 4.

Time Seeing a Hand Surgeon Is Not Associated With Patient Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies, predominantly in the primary care setting, identified time spent with the physician as an important predictor of satisfaction. It is unknown if the same holds true in hand surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Is patient satisfaction measured immediately after an office visit associated with the duration of time spent with the hand surgeon? What other factors are associated with satisfaction directly after the visits and 2 weeks after the appointment? METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 81 patients visiting our hand and upper extremity surgery outpatient clinic. We recorded their demographics and measured physical function, pain behavior, symptoms of depression, time spent in the waiting room, time spent with the physician, and patient satisfaction. Office times were measured using our patient ambulatory tracking system and by a research assistant outside the clinic room. To assess satisfaction we used items from the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (a federally developed standardized survey instrument) relevant to our study. Two weeks later, 51 (64%) patients were available for telephone followup and the same measures were completed. Mean time spent with the hand surgeon was 8 ± 5 minutes and mean in-office wait time to see the hand surgeon was 32 ± 18 minutes. A priori power analyses indicated that 77 patients would provide 80% power to detect an effect size f(2) = 0.18 for a regression with five predictors. This means that we would detect time spent with the physician as a significant factor if it accounted for 7% or more of the variability in satisfaction. RESULTS: Time spent with the hand surgeon was not associated with patient satisfaction measured directly after the visit (r = -0.023; p = 0.84). Longer time waiting to see the physician correlated with decreased patient satisfaction (r = -0.30; p = 0.0057). The final multivariable model for increased satisfaction directly after the office visit included shorter waiting time (regression coefficient [ß] -0.0014; partial R(2) 0.094; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.0024 to -0.00042; p = 0.006) and being married/living with a partner (ß 0.057; partial R(2) 0.11; 95% CI, 0.021-0.093; p = 0.002 [adjusted R(2) 0.18; p < 0.001]). Similarly, multivariable analysis found higher patient satisfaction 2 weeks after the visit to be independently associated with shorter waiting time (ß -0.0037; partial R(2) 0.10; 95% CI, -0.0070 to -0.00054; p = 0.023) and being married/living with a partner (ß 0.15; partial R(2) 0.12; 95% CI, 0.033-0.26; p = 0.012 [adjusted R(2) 0.16; p = 0.0052]). CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction among patients undergoing hand surgery may relate more to shorter time in the waiting room and to the quality more than the quantity of time spent with the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Do patients prefer optional follow-up for simple upper extremity fractures: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the results of offering patients optional follow-up for simple upper extremity fractures. Specifically this study tested if there is a difference in (1) upper extremity disability, (2) return to work, and (3) satisfaction with delivered care at 2-6 months after enrollment between patients who choose and do not choose a return visit for an adequately aligned metacarpal, distal radius, or radial head fracture. Additionally we assessed if there was a difference in overall evaluation of the visit at enrollment between those patients and what factors were associated with returning after initially choosing not to schedule a follow-up visit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled all adult patients (n=120) with adequately aligned metacarpal fractures, non-or minimally displaced distal radius fractures, and isolated non- or minimally displaced radial head fractures of whom 82 (68%) were available at 2-6 months after enrollment. Subjects chose to have a scheduled (n=56) or optional (n=64) return visit. Subsequently, we recorded patient demographics and overall evaluation of the visit. Between two and six months after enrollment we measured QuickDASH, satisfaction with care, and current employment status. RESULTS: Accounting for potential differences in baseline characteristics by multivariable analysis, return choice was not associated with QuickDASH (ß regression coefficient [ß] -0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.4 to 6.4, standard error [SE] 3.5, P=0.88), return to work (odds ratio [OR] -1.3, 95%CI -3.5 to 0.95, SE 1.1, P=0.26), satisfaction with care (ß -0.084, 95%CI -0.51 to 0.35, SE 0.22, P=0.70), or overall evaluation of the initial visit (ß 0.18, 95%CI -0.38 to 0.73, SE 0.28, P=0.53). Of the 64 people choosing optional follow-up, 11 patients returned (17%). The only factor independently associated with returning after initially not choosing to return was greater disability at enrollment (OR 1.05, 95%CI 1.0050-1.098, SE 0.024, P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of patients prefer optional follow-up for simple upper extremity fractures with a good prognosis. Hand surgeons can consider offering patients with low-risk hand fractures an optional second visit. Eliminating unnecessary visits, tests and imaging could lower the cost of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level II.

Catastrophic Thinking Is Associated With Finger Stiffness After Distal Radius Fracture Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To identify demographic, injury-related, or psychologic factors associated with finger stiffness at suture removal and 6 weeks after distal radius fracture surgery. We hypothesize that there are no factors associated with distance to palmar crease at suture removal. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I Academic Urban Trauma Center. PATIENTS: One hundred sixteen adult patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of their distal radius fractures; 96 of whom were also available 6 weeks after surgery. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: At suture removal, we recorded patients' demographics, AO fracture type, carpal tunnel release at the time of surgery, pain catastrophizing scale, Whiteley Index, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, 11-point ordinal measure of pain intensity, distance to palmar crease, and active flexion of the thumb through the small finger. At 6 weeks after surgery, we measured motion, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, and pain intensity. Prereduction and postsurgery radiographic fracture characteristics were assessed. RESULTS: Female sex, being married, specific surgeons, carpal tunnel release, AO type C fractures, and greater catastrophic thinking were associated with increased distance to palmar crease at suture removal. At 6 weeks, greater catastrophic thinking was the only factor associated with increased distance to palmar crease. CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophic thinking was a consistent and major determinant of finger stiffness at suture removal and 6 weeks after injury. Future research should assess if treatments that ameliorate catastrophic thinking can facilitate recovery of finger motion after operative treatment of a distal radius fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.