Formulation development of chewable albendazole tablets with improved dissolution rate.

BACKGROUND: Albendazole is an orally administered broad-spectrum anthelmintic. Currently it is mostly used in the treatment of soil transmitted helminthes, hydatidosis and neurocysticercosis caused Taenia solium.Aim of the study. To develop and optimize a formulation of chewable albendazole tablet with improved dissolution rate. METHODOLOGY: This study was specifically focused on formulation development which passes compatibility studies and optimization of the developed formulation. The formulations were evaluated on assay, dissolution, friability, hardness, weight variation, disintegration and similarity in comparison with the reference product on the market. Analysis was required to be undertaken by High performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) analytical methods. Design of Expert version 7 software was used for selection or making scientific decisions in selecting the best composition of the best formulation. RESULTS: Five formulations out of ten (F-6, F-7, F-8, F-9 and F10) had all parameters in acceptable range. On optimization, one formulation with independent variables, Sodium Laury Sulphate (SLS) 1.911%, polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP-K30) 3.128%, and Sodium Cross carmellose (CCM) 4.95% was selected out of ten predictions made with Design expert version 7.0. It was found that assay of the best formulation is 99.23% which was within the in-house assay specification 95-105%. Dissolution single point in 30 min was found to be 91.5% disintegration between 2-5 min and friability 0.45%.The optimized formulation was tested and found to be within the acceptable limits. The formulation was comparable to the reference product on the market with similarity factor (f2) 62 and difference factor (f1) of 6 at pH1.2. CONCLUSION: A new generic albendazole tablet with improved dissolution rate was formulated, developed and optimized by using a wet granulation method.

Pharmaceuticals imports in Tanzania: Overview of private sector market size, share, growth and projected trends to 2021.

BACKGROUND: To assess the extent to which foreign pharmaceutical imports vary from year to year and identifying leading generic and branded formulations, key countries and key importers of pharmaceuticals in private sector supply chain. METHODOLOGY: A systematic analysis of data for pharmaceutical imports from the Ministry of Health.Data from 2013 to 2016 fiscal years and relevant documents were accessed from the Tanzania Food and Drugs Authority (TFDA). Data cleaning was carried out to remove duplicate entries and to exclude pharmaceutical imports for individual uses, promotion purpose, donations, raw material, medical devices, government institutions and veterinary products. RESULTS: A total of 397 different suppliers imported pharmaceutical in Tanzania mainland from 2013 to 2016 fiscal years. In the 2013-2014 fiscal year, the private sector suppliers imported pharmaceutical worth 216 U.S million dollars. India ranked as the first country for exporting highest value of pharmaceutical into the country. It displays a 54% cumulative market share of total imports from 2013-2016, followed by Egypt (11.7%), Switzerland and the USA hold 4.1% of cumulative market share. By 2020-2021 fiscal years, we forecast for imported pharmaceuticals to reach a total value of 906 U.S million dollars for the private sector supply chain. All analysis in this study and the forecasted figures are limited to private sector pharmaceutical supply chain only and does not include data for government pharmaceutical supply chain. CONCLUSIONS: Our result shows that the vast majority of pharmaceutical imports in the private sector supply chain are dominated by imports from India. India is competing with other countries such as Egypt, Switzerland, USA and South Africa among the top importing countries. There was almost an equal distribution of pharmaceutical for both communicable and non-communicable diseases. Data presented shows a growing trend for the market segment for medicines required for the management of non-communicable diseases. Generally, the private sector pharmaceutical market is keeping on rising at a rapid pace. By the year 2021, the growth is forecasted to increase by 28% compared to the current market value. The projected growth rate could be good news for foreign pharmaceutical companies seeking new sources of growth in international pharmaceutical trading. It is also good news to the poor patients if the availability of drugs previously unavailable in the country is significantly increased.

Formulation development and optimization of Lamivudine 300 mg and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300 mg FDC tablets by D-optimal mixture design.

The usage of fixed dose combination (FDC) tablets of Lamivudine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) is increasing due to increased incidences of HIV/Hepatitis B and HIV/TB co-infections. This is likely to increase the financial crisis due to limited resources for funding procurement of ready-made products from the pharmaceuticals manufacturing leading countries. Therefore, production of local oral tablets containing Lamivudine and TDF FDC is inevitable. Lamivudine 300 mg/TDF 300 mg tablets were developed and optimized by D-optimal mixture design and produced by direct compression technique. Twenty trial formulations with independent variables, including PVP-CL 1-12.00%, PVP-K30 1-10.00%, starch-1500 2.5-12.5% and Avicel-PH102 2-19.25% were prepared by direct compression technique. The formulations were assessed on assay, dissolution, friability, weight variation and disintegration time. It was found that assay ranged from 98.13-101.95% for Lamivudine, 98.25-102.84 for TDF, both were within the in-house assay specification of 95 to 105%. Dissolution at single point was above 80% for Lamivudine 93.96-100.55% and 95.85-103.15% for TDF, disintegration time was between 1.92-66.33 min and friability 0.06-12.56%. Out of twenty formulation trials, eight formulations had all parameters in proven acceptable range. On optimization, one formulation with independent variables, PVP-CL 5.67%, PVP-K30 1.00%, Starch-1500 5.76% was selected. The optimized formulation was comparable to the reference product on the market with similarity factor (f2) and difference factor (f1) within the acceptable range for both Lamivudine and TDF.