Comparison of nonseptic and septic bursitis. Further observations on the treatment of septic bursitis.

Of 30 cases of olecranon and prepatellar bursitis, ten were septic. Fever, tenderness, peribursal cellulitis, and skin involvement over the bursa were more common in the septic cases. A high leukocyte count, low bursal-to-serum glucose ratio, and positive Gram-stained smear of the bursal fluid distinguished septic from nonseptic bursitis. Rheumatoid arthritis and gout may be accompanied by nonseptic bursitis. Septic bursitis may be associated with a sympathetic sterile effusion in a neighboring joint or adjacent fascial space. The duration of antibiotic treatment necessary to sterilize bursal fluid was proportional to the length of time infection had been present. A prospective antibiotic program disclosed an average of 12 days for successful therapy. A bactericidal agent against penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is the drug of choice.

Short-course ciprofloxacin treatment of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. The minimum effective dose. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group [corrected].

BACKGROUND: Three studies were undertaken to determine the minimum effective dosing regimen of ciprofloxacin for the treatment of acute, symptomatic, uncomplicated lower urinary tract infection. METHODS: All studies were multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind trials. A total of 970 evaluable patients with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection received oral ciprofloxacin (200 mg to 500 mg daily in one or two divided doses for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days) or norfloxacin (400 mg twice daily [BID] for 7 days). The primary measure of efficacy was bacteriologic eradication at the end of therapy. RESULTS: In study 1, bacteriologic eradication was reported in 95 (89%) and 101 (98%) of patients in the groups who received ciprofloxacin, 500-mg single dose and 250 mg BID for 7 days, respectively. Clinical success occurred in 101 patients (94%) who received a 500-mg single dose and in 103 patients (100%) who were administered 250 mg BID for 7 days. In study 2, eradication rates in the groups who received ciprofloxacin, 100 mg BID for 3 days, 250 mg BID for 3 days, and 250 mg BID for 7 days, were 98 (93%), 95 (90%), and 98 (93%), respectively. Clinical success was reported in 102 (97%), 105 (100%), and 104 (98%) of the patients, respectively. In study 3, the eradication rates in the groups who received ciprofloxacin in dosages of 500 mg once daily for 3 days and 500 mg once daily for 5 days and norfloxacin in a dosage of 400 mg BID for 7 days were 137 (92%), 134 (90%), and 133 (94%) of the women, respectively. Clinical success was the same (97%) in all three groups. Overall, short-course (either 3- or 5-day) therapy with ciprofloxacin was statistically equivalent to conventional (7-day) therapy with either ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin. Single-dose ciprofloxacin therapy was statistically less effective than conventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin at a dosage of 100 mg BID for 3 days was the minimum effective dose for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women.

Oral ciprofloxacin therapy for chronic contiguous osteomyelitis caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Twenty adult patients with chronic contiguous osteomyelitis caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli were enrolled in an open, prospective cooperative study to determine the effect of oral ciprofloxacin therapy in a dosage of 750 mg every 12 hours. There were 14 men and six women, with a mean age of 55 years. Fifteen of the 20 patients had undergone previous unsuccessful attempts at therapy; seven of the 20 patients had clinically important underlying diseases. Osteomyelitis involved the sternum in three patients and the bones of the lower extremity in 17 patients. Initial surgical debridement was performed in 15 of 20 patients. The predominant organism isolated was Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which was found as a single pathogen in 13 patients and as part of a polymicrobic flora in three patients. Based on posttreatment follow-up of seven to 21 months, clinical cure was achieved in 13 of 20 (65 percent) patients and bacteriologic cure was achieved in 14 of 20 (70 percent) patients. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin against P. aeruginosa increased during therapy in four of 16 (25 percent) patients. Minor gastrointestinal side effects occurred in five patients. Oral ciprofloxacin was an effective and safe therapy in patients with chronic contiguous osteomyelitis due to aerobic gram-negative bacilli.

Randomized trial of ciprofloxacin compared with other antimicrobial therapy in the treatment of osteomyelitis.

Thirty adults (mean age, 52 years) were enrolled in a randomized, comparative trial of oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg twice daily) and other antimicrobial therapies. Etiologic agents included Enterobacteriaceae (18 isolates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 isolates), and Staphylococcus aureus (four isolates). Seven of 14 (50 percent) ciprofloxacin-treated infections are cured at up to 13 months follow-up and three infections appear improved. Treatment failure or relapse has occurred in four patients. Sixteen patients received other antimicrobial therapy and 11 patients (65 percent) remain without infection and have healed wounds, with follow-up from one to 13 months. One patient has had a relapse, while improvement is apparent in four patients. Complications that occurred in this group included drug-related neutropenia (two patients), diarrhea (two patients), drug allergy (one patient), and catheter-related staphylococcal cellulitis (one patient). Oral ciprofloxacin therapy for chronic osteomyelitis caused by susceptible organisms appears to be as effective as other antimicrobial therapies.

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the ambulatory use of parenteral cephalosporins.

It has been clearly documented that outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) saves money compared with hospital care for patients who need intravenous antimicrobial therapy. The reduced expenses come primarily from savings in facility and hospital staffing costs. In addition to shortening hospital stay, OPAT programmes can be developed so that hospital care is avoided altogether. However, even with the clear potential for savings, to have a successful programme it is necessary to align the interests of the payers, the physicians, the administrators and the patients. The cost of OPAT programmes can also be reduced through patient evaluation and careful selection of the appropriate delivery model, antibiotic, dosage intervals and infusion technology. The fact that antibiotics such as ceftriaxone, the aminoglycosides and vancomycin can be given once daily in the elderly offers particular advantages in terms of convenience as well as cost. In order to achieve cost savings, managed care will increasingly rely on home and outpatient therapy. This pressure will need to be counterbalanced by quality assurance programmes and outcomes measurements.

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy for osteomyelitis.

OPAT for osteomyelitis is effective, safe, and well-established. There are particular considerations with osteomyelitis, however, that relate to patient selection and the plans of therapy. Orthopedic infections may impose physical considerations that need to be considered. Concomitant medical problems, such as diabetes, must be considered and may be good reasons for hospital care aside from the infection. Further investigations of treatment of osteomyelitis are clearly needed, with OPAT patients being good subjects to study.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for fever and neutropenia.

The treatment of fever and neutropenia following chemotherapy lends itself well to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). Patients prefer to be at home rather than hospitalized again. There is a clear cost advantage of outpatient therapy. With a quality program and careful patient selection, OPAT can be provided effectively and safely. The chances of an infection due to resistant bacteria also appear to be reduced. There are an increasing number of studies that support the use of empiric antibiotic therapy for the first fever in neutropenic patients. The choice of antimicrobial, dose, as well as vascular access and infusion devices must be tailored to the individual patient needs and circumstances.

Comparison of sparfloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in women. Sparfloxacin Multicenter Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection Study Group.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common illness, with > or =30% of all women experiencing a UTI during their lifetime. Less than a decade ago, the standard therapy for acute uncomplicated UTIs involved treatment with > or =7 days of an antibacterial agent, but recent studies using a variety of newly introduced antibiotics, including the fluoroquinolones, have demonstrated that a 1- to 5-day treatment regimen can be equally effective. This randomized, double-masked, multicenter study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a single dose of sparfloxacin with those of a 3-day regimen of sparfloxacin and a 7-day regimen of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of women with community-acquired acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection. A total of 1175 women were enrolled; 395 received sparfloxacin as a single 400-mg dose on day 1, 394 received sparfloxacin as a 400-mg loading dose on day 1 followed by 200 mg once daily for 2 additional days, and 386 received ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for 7 days. Patients were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics and underlying conditions. A total of 954 patients were clinically assessable; 490 of these were also bacteriologically assessable. All patients treated were included in the tolerability analysis. Escherichia coli (75.4%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.9%), Enterococcus faecalis (4.6%), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (4.1%) were the most commonly isolated organisms. In the all-treated population, clinical success was achieved 5 to 9 days after therapy in 91.8%, 92.2%, and 91.6% of patients in the single-dose sparfloxacin, 3-day sparfloxacin, and 7-day ciprofloxacin groups, respectively; bacteriologic success was observed in 91.7%, 92.6%, and 96.6% of those in the 3 groups. Sustained clinical success rates 4 to 6 weeks after therapy were 76.6%, 80.2%, and 79.5% in the single-dose sparfloxacin, 3-day sparfloxacin, and 7-day ciprofloxacin groups, respectively; sustained bacteriologic success rates were 80.7%, 90.1%, and 92.6%. The most common adverse events were nausea, headache, vaginal thrush, dizziness, and diarrhea; >92% of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. The 2 drugs had comparable frequencies of adverse events, except for photosensitivity, which occurred in 3.3% of the 3-day sparfloxacin group, 1.3% of the single-dose sparfloxacin group, and 0.3% of the ciprofloxacin group (P = 0.005). The 3-day sparfloxacin regimen was effective and well tolerated. The initial response to single-dose sparfloxacin treatment was comparable to the response to the other 2 regimens, but the single-dose regimen proved less effective over time, with higher rates of clinical recurrence and bacteriologic relapse. Sparfloxacin provides an alternative to ciprofloxacin for patients with acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection who are not at risk for photosensitivity reactions or adverse events associated with a prolonged corrected QT interval.

The importance of teamwork for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy.

A variety of treatment models can be constructed to provide intravenous antibiotic therapy outside the hospital. The type and details of each model must be adapted to local needs and resources, but those that coordinate the resources of all the primary members of the team necessary to care for patients, offer the greatest potential for a safe and efficient programme. We believe that the teamwork of the physician, nurse, and pharmacist in our clinic-based, physician-directed model can provide a safe and effective service, which is appreciated by the patients we care for.

Selecting infusion devices for use in ambulatory care.

Intravenous infusion devices commonly used in home care and ambulatory care settings are reviewed and factors to consider in selecting a device are suggested. The type of therapy to be administered, the patient or caregiver's ability to understand and carry out instructions, staff time required for patient teaching and drug and device preparation, drug stability, frequency of doses, reservoir volume, control of flow rate, type of venous access, cost and availability of devices and supplies, and reimbursement should be considered. Cost-effectiveness of a device can be evaluated only by analyzing all of the costs associated with administering a medication. Decisions must be based on an individual agency's needs, but usually one type of single-dose infuser and one brand of electronic ambulatory-care infusion pump can meet the needs of most of an agency's patients. For patients self-administering up to four doses per day, appropriate methods may include slow intravenous injection (i.v. push), infusion from minibags and tubing, and the use of elastomeric infusers, electronic or mechanical syringe pumps, or a new device based on infusion across a bioelectric membrane. Some of these types of infusers can also be used for continuous infusion. Syringe pumps are reliable and affordable and control infusion rates well, but infusion volume is limited and these devices must be recovered, cleaned, and tested between patients. Although elastomeric pumps may have higher price tags than other devices, they are simple for patients to use and dispose of. While elastomeric devices have tubing permanently attached, the disposable tubing of some other devices is detachable and can be reused if institutional policy permits. Electronic ambulatory-care infusion pumps can meet a wide range of infusion requirements. They vary in size, weight, ability to detect occlusions, features, and reliability. All use proprietary infusion sets, but the costs of sets and disposable supplies vary. Some pumps can be used for a single infusion mode, such as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); others offer two or more modes (for example, continuous, intermittent, and PCA). "Multichannel" pumps can be used for simultaneous infusion of up to four medications; the rate of each infusion is programmed separately, and some multichannel devices offer multiple infusion modes. Some can be programmed remotely by telephone. Before an agency decides on a pump, it can investigate current users' and rental firms' experiences with the device. Also, all relevant personnel should try programming the device. Determining which devices to use requires a comparison of features that are pertinent to the particular agency or institution and a cost analysis that considers acquisition, reimbursement, patient training time, and the cost of disposable supplies.

International outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

On an international basis, outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) varies greatly. There are cultural as well as economic issues which make it different in every country. In general, the duration of hospital stay varies with the outpatient resources available and the economic base for them. In some countries, there may not be money available for any intravenous antibiotics, even in the hospital. In addition, there are great differences in outpatient intravenous therapy, with infusion clinics proliferating in China, yet these are scarce in the UK. There is also considerable variation in the use of intramuscular compared with intravenous therapies. In Italy, intramuscular ceftriaxone is used more often than intravenous therapy. While ceftriaxone use is high in the US, its use is surpassed on a per capita basis by Italy, and it is most interesting that the rate of antimicrobial resistance is lower in Italy than in most other European countries. Whether this relates to outpatient use, parenteral use or other unknown factors is unclear. Obviously, further studies are necessary.

Ceftriaxone in treatment of serious infections. Osteomyelitis.

Ceftriaxone is an effective and safe agent for the treatment of osteomyelitis. It is active against most of the causative organisms. Combined with surgery, it is useful for all types of osteomyelitis. In addition, its once-daily dosing has made outpatient therapy feasible for most patients. Questions that remain are whether full treatment with 2 gm every 24 hours for four to six weeks is needed for osteomyelitis or whether 1 gm/day would provide comparable results. The relevance of minimal inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations and serum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations has not been-determined. Some questions remain about the cure rate of ceftriaxone against S. aureus osteomyelitis, although most cases do well. Comparative studies with agents such as cefazolin or oxacillin would be helpful to resolve this issue. Long-term follow-up of patients treated for osteomyelitis outcome has not been done in sufficient detail to be certain of the comparative results of different antimicrobials. The success rate of the quinolones against gram-negative osteomyelitis appears good, but their activity against gram-positive organisms is uncertain, and development of resistance is a problem. Questions still linger in regard to how much can be accomplished with antimicrobial therapy without surgery and how long antimicrobials are needed once effective surgery has been performed.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Management of serious infections. Part II: Amenable infections and models for delivery. Osteomyelitis.

Osteomyelitis is one of the most common and well-established indications for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Because patients are usually otherwise healthy and therapy is prolonged (four to six weeks), this infection is especially suited to outpatient management. While most gram-negative infections in adults can be treated with an oral quinolone, others usually require IV therapy.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy. Management of serious infections. Part I: Medical, socioeconomic, and legal issues. The team concept.

The delivery of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy is a team effort that, at minimum, requires a physician, a nurse, and a pharmacist. Other specialists may be added as needed. The team may be structured in several different ways, but two basic models emerge: physician-directed and nonphysician-directed. Whatever the structure, the physician should maintain a leadership role in the care of the patient.

Once-daily ceftriaxone outpatient therapy in adults with infections.

Since 1981 our physicians' office has developed an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy programme which has shown advantages in patient care and provided significant cost savings. While we were able to provide any parenteral antibiotic available, the mainstay of our programme was ceftriaxone because of its broad range of activity, safety, and once-daily administration. Two hundred and ninety cases of outpatient ceftriaxone usage were recorded between January 1989 and March 1990. Ceftriaxone was found to be most useful for bone, soft tissue, and gynaecological infections. Not only was it highly clinically successful, but it was safe to use in the twice-weekly monitoring parameters we routinely perform in our office. The use of ceftriaxone alone during the 15-month period accounted for savings of over US $1.2 million compared to the cost of hospitalization during this period.