Detalhe da pesquisa
1.
How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
Med Decis Making
; 43(7-8): 803-820, 2023.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37842816
2.
The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.
Med Decis Making
; 43(7-8): 774-788, 2023.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37872798
3.
Revisiting the Open Sampling format: Improving risky choices through a novel graphical representation.
Psychon Bull Rev
; 29(2): 648-659, 2022 Apr.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731442
4.
Subgroup Splits in Diverse Work Teams: Subgroup Perceptions but Not Demographic Faultlines Affect Team Identification and Emotional Exhaustion.
Front Psychol
; 12: 595720, 2021.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33643128
5.
When Does the Incremental Risk Format Aid Informed Medical Decisions? The Role of Learning, Feedback, and Number of Treatment Options.
Med Decis Making
; 40(2): 212-221, 2020 02.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32036764
6.
The loss-bet paradox: Actuaries, accountants, and other numerate people rate numerically inferior gambles as superior.
J Behav Decis Mak
; 32(1): 15-29, 2019 Jan.
Artigo
Inglês
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32313368