RESUMO
This study aimed to assess the status of national diabetes associations in the Pacific Island Countries and Territories as a starting point for strengthening their development and effectiveness in the prevention and control of diabetes. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 21 Pacific Island Countries and Territories using a structured questionnaire that gathered information from national non-communicable diseases prevention and control focal persons on diabetes associations, organizational structure, funding sources, and ongoing activities to address diabetes. The overall status of national diabetes associations was assessed using standardized criteria. Of the 21 countries surveyed, 18 (86%) responded. Of these, 12 (67%; American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, French Polynesia, Fiji, Guam, Nauru, Papua New Guinea, Marshall Islands, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Vanuatu) have a national diabetes association. Half of the existing associations are fully functioning, while the remainder is either partially functioning or not functioning. Only 50% of existing associations have a regular funding source, and many lack clear visions and workable governance structures. This study fills a knowledge gap on the current status of associations and forms a baseline from which associations can be strengthened. It also draws attention to the need for Pacific leaders to invest and engage more in civil societies for better and effective diabetes care for all.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Humanos , Melanesia , Ilhas do Pacífico/epidemiologia , Polinésia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
In 2010 the US-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) declared a regional state of health emergency due to the epidemic of non-communicable disease (NCD) and an NCD monitoring and surveillance framework was developed that includes adult NCD risk factor and disease prevalence indicators to be collected every 5 years using a population-based survey. On evaluation of existing data from adult population-based NCD surveys, it was found that there was a lack of valid, available and consistently collected data. Therefore, a new model was developed to combine various indicators and survey tools from different partner agencies into one survey. After the report was endorsed by local health leadership, a dissemination workshop was conducted. In 2015 (baseline for Hybrid Survey implementation), three out of nine jurisdictions (33.3%) had completed a population-based survey in the past 5 years. Four (44.4%) had no adult prevalence data at all, two (22.2%) had data sets from their surveys and four (44.4%) had at least two surveys ever collected that could be used for comparison. As of 2020, all nine jurisdictions have, or are in the process of completing an adult population-based survey. Eight (88.9%) have data sets from their surveys, and five (55.6%) have at least two surveys collected that can be used for comparison. This Hybrid Survey model has helped to improve adult NCD surveillance in the USAPI by more efficiently using limited resources. This model could be considered in other small island nations, or rural areas where adult NCD surveillance is challenging.
Assuntos
Doenças não Transmissíveis , Adulto , Humanos , Doenças não Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Ilhas do Pacífico/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Globally, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is threatening human health and changing the way people live. With the increasing evidence showing comorbidities of COVID-19 and non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the Pacific region, where approximately 75% of deaths are due to NCDs, is significantly vulnerable during this crisis unless urgent action is taken. Whilst enforcing the critical mitigation measures of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Pacific, it is also paramount to incorporate and strengthen NCD prevention and control measures to safeguard people with NCDs and the general population; keep people healthy and minimise the impact of COVID-19. To sustain wellbeing of health, social relationships, and the economy in the Pacific, it is a critical time for all governments, development partners and civil societies to show regional solidarity in the fight against emerging COVID-19 health crisis and existing Pacific NCDs crisis through a whole of government and whole of society approach.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Saúde Pública , COVID-19 , Humanos , Ilhas do Pacífico , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
AIM: To determine the costs associated with diabetes to governments, people with diabetes and their carers, and its impact on quality of life in two Pacific Island countries--the Solomon Islands and Nauru. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional cost of illness study was conducted on 330 people with type 2 diabetes (197 from the Solomon Islands and 133 from Nauru) using a structured cost of illness survey questionnaire adapted from the Australian DiabCo$t study. Quality of life was measured by the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: There were 330 respondents (50% female; mean duration of diabetes 10.9 years; mean age 52.6 years). The estimated annual national cost of diabetes incurred by the Solomon Islands government was AUD 12.8 million (AUD 281 per person/year) and by Nauru government was AUD 1.2 million (AUD 747 per person/year). The major contribution to the government costs was inpatient services cost (71% in the Solomon Islands and 83% in Nauru). Annual expenditure for diabetes was approximately 20% of the governments' annual health care expenditure. Considerable absenteeism and retirement from work due to diabetes was found. CONCLUSIONS: This study found substantial public and personal costs associated with diabetes. The findings provide objective data on which health policy, funding and planning decisions about the prevention and control of diabetes in the Solomon Islands and Nauru can be reliably based and subsequently evaluated.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Complicações do Diabetes/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Complicações do Diabetes/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
AIM: To examine the available evidence about the epidemiology, health, social, and economic impact of diabetes in Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature published in English from January 1990 to January 2014, and relevant technical reports. RESULTS: A total of 1548 articles were identified of which 35 studies of type 2 diabetes met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen technical reports were also included. We found no articles reporting on type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes that met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence, risk factors and complications of diabetes were substantial. Diabetes prevalence rate of around 40% was common. Physical inactivity, overweight and obesity were leading risk factors. High rates of diabetes complications were reported e.g. up to 69% retinopathy. Poor clinical outcomes were also reported with over 70% not meeting glycaemic control targets and approximately 50% not meeting blood pressure and cholesterol targets. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the burden of diabetes in PICTs and the need for more intensive interventions to improve the quality and outcomes of diabetes care. Overall, further research is needed to monitor secular diabetes trends in PICTs using standardised criteria for diagnosing diabetes and its complications.