Long-term prognostic value of risk scores after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery: A pooled analysis of the ISAR-LEFT-MAIN and ISAR-LEFT-MAIN 2 randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of risk scores in the setting of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for uLMCA. BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic value of novel risk scores developed to select the most appropriate revascularization strategy in patients undergoing DES implantation for uLMCA disease are relatively limited. METHODS: The study represents a patient-level pooled analysis of the ISAR-LEFT-MAIN (607 patients randomized to paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents) and the ISAR-LEFT-MAIN-2 (650 patients randomized to everolimus-eluting or zotarolimus-eluting stents) randomized trials. The Syntax Score (SxScore) as well the Syntax Score II (SS-II), the EuroSCORE and the Global Risk Classification (GRC) were calculated. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 3 years there were 160 deaths (12.7%). The death-incidence was significantly higher in the upper tertiles than in the intermediate or lower ones for all risk scores (log-rank test P < 0.01 for all comparisons). The discriminatory power of a multivariable model for prediction of 3-year mortality was significantly improved after the inclusion of EuroSCORE (adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve = 0.779, 95% confidence interval 0.747 to 0.810, P = 0.008), but not after the inclusion of SxScore, SS II, or GRC. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing DES implantation for uLMCA disease, all evaluated risk scores were able to stratify the mortality risk at long-term follow-up. EuroSCORE was the only risk score that significantly improved the discriminatory power of a multivariable model to predict long-term mortality. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting.

BACKGROUND: In patients receiving aspirin, the optimal duration of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains unclear. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial tested the hypothesis that in patients undergoing DES implantation, 6 months of clopidogrel is non-inferior to 12 months in terms of clinical outcomes. At 6 months after DES implantation, patients on clopidogrel were randomly assigned to either a 6-month period of placebo or an additional 6-month period of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding at 9 months after randomization. RESULTS: Owing to slow recruitment and low event rates, the trial was stopped prematurely after enrolment of 4005 of 6000 planned patients. Of 4000 patients included in the final analysis, 1997 received 6 months of clopidogrel and 2003 received 12 months. The primary endpoint occurred in 29 patients (1.5%) assigned to 6 months of clopidogrel and 32 patients (1.6%) assigned to 12 months, observed difference -0.1%, upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5%, limit of non-inferiority 2%, Pfor noninferiority <0.001. Stent thrombosis was observed in five patients (0.3%) assigned to 6 months of clopidogrel and three patients (0.2%) assigned to 12 months; hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% CI: 0.40-6.96, P = 0.49. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding was observed in 4 patients (0.2%) assigned to 6 months clopidogrel and 5 patients (0.3%) assigned to 12 months; HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.21-2.98, P = 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: In the present trial, characterized by low event rates, we did not observe a significant difference in net clinical outcome between 6 and 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after DES implantation. However, the results of the trial must be considered in view of its premature termination and lower than expected event rates. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00661206.

Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: The best way to manage restenosis in patients who have previously received a drug-eluting stent is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and balloon angioplasty in these patients. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label trial, we enrolled patients older than 18 years with restenosis of at least 50% after implantation of any limus-eluting stent at three centres in Germany between Aug 3, 2009, and Oct 27, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; stratified according to centre) to receive PEB, PES, or balloon angioplasty alone by means of sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated sequence. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but events and angiograms were assessed by individuals who were masked. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography at 6-8 months. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987324. FINDINGS: We enrolled 402 patients, of whom 137 (34%) were assigned to PEB, 131 (33%) to PES, and 134 (33%) to balloon angioplasty. Follow-up angiography at 6-8 months was available for 338 (84%) patients. PEB was non-inferior to PES in terms of diameter stenosis (38·0% [SD 21·5] vs 37·4% [21·8]; difference 0·6%, one-sided 95% CI 4·9%; p(non-inferiority)=0·007; non-inferiority margin of 7%). Findings were consistent in per-protocol analysis (p(non-inferiority)=0·011). PEB and PES were superior to balloon angioplasty alone (54·1% [25·0]; p(superiority)<0·0001 for both comparisons). Frequency of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: By obviating the need for additional stent implantation, PEB could be a useful treatment for patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent. FUNDING: Deutsches Herzzentrum.

Novel mitral clipping technique overcoming extreme atrial dilatation.

The mitral clipping technique is emerging as a promising new treatment option for severe mitral regurgitation. The device was designed and assessed in intermediate risk populations, which is in contrast to the real world, where most patients are deemed to be at very high risk for open heart surgery. The cardiac anatomy of these patients often challenges the freedom grades of the current mitral clip device. In this case presentation, we describe a novel technique overcoming extreme atrial dilation in a patient with severe mitral regurgitation despite previous implantation of two mitral clips. Based on a low/anterior trans-septal puncture, this procedure relied on a counter clock-wise 90° turn of the steerable sheath and alignment of the clip delivery system to the mitral valve, thereby gaining additional longitudinal freedom. This resulted in the successful implantation of two additional clips with achievement of a mild to moderate mitral regurgitation without relevant gradient and dramatic and sustained clinical improvement of the patient.

Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft lesions (ISAR-CABG): a randomised controlled superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Comparative assessment of clinical outcomes after use of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for treatment of aortocoronary saphenous vein graft lesions has not been undertaken in large randomised trials. We aimed to undertake a comparison in a randomised trial powered for clinical endpoints. METHODS: In this randomised superiority trial, patients with de-novo saphenous vein graft lesions were assigned by computer-generated sequence (1:1:1:3) to receive either drug-eluting stents (one of three types: permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents, permanent-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents, or biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents) or bare-metal stents. Randomisation took place immediately after crossing of the lesion with a guidewire, and was stratified for each participating centre. Investigators assessing data were masked to treatment allocation; patients were not masked to allocation. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation at 1 year. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00611910. FINDINGS: 610 patients were allocated to treatment groups (303 drug-eluting stent, 307 bare-metal stent). Drug-eluting stents reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint compared with bare-metal stents (44 [15%] vs 66 [22%] patients; hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94; p=0.02). Target lesion revascularisation rate was reduced by drug-eluting stents (19 [7%] vs 37 [13%] patients; HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28-0.86; p=0.01). No significant differences were seen between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents regarding all-cause mortality (15 [5%] vs 14 [5%] patients; HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.52-2.24; p=0.83), myocardial infarction (12 [4%] vs 18 [6%]; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.32-1.37; p=0.27), or definite or probable stent thrombosis (2 [1%] in both groups; HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.14-7.10; p=0.99). INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de-novo saphenous vein graft lesions, drug-eluting stents are the preferred treatment option because they reduce the risk of adverse events compared with bare-metal stents. FUNDING: Deutsches Herzzentrum.

Angiographic outcomes with biodegradable polymer and permanent polymer drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: In the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of 3 Limus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST-4) trial, we demonstrated the noninferiority of biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting stent to permanent polymer (PP) sirolimus/everolimus-eluting stent (Cypher/Xience-V) on the basis of clinical outcomes. In this study, we compare the antirestenotic efficacy of these stents in ISAR-TEST-4 patients with paired angiographic studies. METHODS: Patients with de novo coronary lesions in native vessels (excluding left main lesions) were randomly assigned to receive a BP stent or a PP stent. Endpoints of interest of this study were in-stent late lumen loss, in-segment binary restenosis, and restenosis morphology at 6-8-month follow-up angiogram. RESULTS: Of the 2,603 patients (3,372 lesions) enrolled in ISAR TEST-4 trial, 2,016 patients (2,637 lesions) underwent repeat angiographic examination 6-8 months after randomization: 1,006 patients (1,323 lesions) treated with BP stents and 1,010 patients (1,314 lesions) treated with PP stents. No difference was observed between BP and PP stents in in-stent late lumen loss (0.24 ± 0.6 vs. 0.26 ± 0.5 mm, respectively, P = 0.49) or in in-segment binary restenosis (11.6% [153 lesions] vs. 11.8% [155 lesions], P = 0.85). Focal pattern of restenosis was observed in the majority of patients receiving either BP or PP stents. The diffuse pattern of restenosis was observed in 26.8% of patients treated with BP stent and 26.5% of patients treated with PP stent (P = 0.79). CONCLUSION: Angiographic characteristics of restenosis after BP-based limus-eluting stents are similar to those of PP-based limus-eluting stents.

Five-year clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: First generation drug-eluting stents have shown differential efficacy in high-risk patient subsets at one year. It is unclear whether these differences endure over the medium- to long-term. We compared the five-year clinical efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in a population of high-risk patients. METHODS: The patient cohorts of the ISAR-DESIRE, ISAR-DIABETES, and ISAR-SMART-3 randomized trials were followed up for five years and data were pooled. The primary efficacy endpoint of the analysis was the need for target lesion revascularization (TLR) during a five-year follow-up period. The primary safety endpoint was the combination of death or myocardial infarction (MI) after five years. RESULTS: A total of 810 patients (405 patients in the SES group and 405 patients in the PES group) was included. Over five years TLR was reduced by 39% with SES compared with PES stent (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.85; P = 0.004). No difference was observed according to death or MI rates between the two groups (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.80-1.50; P = 0.57). Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0.2% (n = 1) in the SES group and in 1.6% (n = 6) in the PES group (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.02-1.34; P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk patient subsets the lower rate of 12-month TLR observed with SES in comparison PES is maintained out to five years. In terms of safety, although there was no difference in the overall incidence of death or MI, there was a trend towards more frequent stent thromboses with PES.

High sensitive troponin T and heart fatty acid binding protein: novel biomarker in heart failure with normal ejection fraction? A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: High sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) and heart fatty acid binding protein (hFABP) are both markers of myocardial injury and predict adverse outcome in patients with systolic heart failure (SHF). We tested whether hsTnT and hFABP plasma levels are elevated in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFnEF). METHODS: We analyzed hsTnT, hFABP and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide in 130 patients comprising 49 HFnEF patients, 51 patients with asymptomatic left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), and 30 controls with normal diastolic function. Patients were classified to have HFnEF when the diagnostic criteria as recommended by the European Society of Cardiology were met. RESULTS: Levels of hs TnT and hFABP were significantly higher in patients with asymptomatic LVDD and HFnEF (both p < 0.001) compared to controls. The hsTnT levels were 5.6 [0.0-9.8] pg/ml in LVDD vs. 8.5 [3.9-17.5] pg/ml in HFnEF vs. <0.03 [< 0.03-6.4] pg/ml in controls; hFABP levels were 3029 [2533-3761] pg/ml in LVDD vs. 3669 [2918-4839] pg/ml in HFnEF vs. 2361 [1860-3081] pg/ml in controls. Furthermore, hsTnT and hFABP levels were higher in subjects with HFnEF compared to LVDD (p = 0.015 and p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: In HFnEF patients, hsTnT and hFABP are elevated independent of coronary artery disease, suggesting that ongoing myocardial damage plays a critical role in the pathophysiology. A combination of biomarkers and echocardiographic parameters might improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification of patients with HFnEF.

Quantitative impact of cardiovascular risk factors and vascular closure devices on the femoral artery after repeat cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the exact quantitative long-term impact of repeated catheterizations, vascular closure devices, and cardiovascular risk factors on the femoral artery after cardiac catheterization. METHODS: A total of 2,102 available femoral angiograms from 827 consecutive patients were analyzed using caliper-based quantitative vascular analysis. These patients underwent coronary interventions between January 2005 and April 2007 and had at least one additional catheterization procedure through the ipsilateral femoral access site from December 2001 until January 2008. Multivariate analysis was performed to control for confounding variables. The primary outcome was change in artery size. RESULTS: The average punctured artery diameter was 6.5 +/- 2.1 mm. The average time between the first case and last follow-up was 349 days. There was no significant change of the punctured artery size over time after the index procedure (P = .15) and no change associated with the use of vascular closure devices (P = .25) after multivariate analysis. Smaller arteries were associated with female gender (-1.22 mm, P < .0001), presence of angiographic peripheral vascular disease (PVD, -1.19 mm, P < .0001), and current (-0.48 mm, P = .001) or former (-0.23 mm, P = .01) smoking status, whereas previous statin therapy was associated with an increase in artery size (+0.47 mm, P < .0001). Vascular closure devices were used less often compared with manual compression in cases preceding the first detection of angiographic PVD (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Vascular closure devices are not associated with a change in the artery size or progression of PVD. Overall, there is no change in vessel size over time after repeat catheterizations, with a decrease in vessel size associated with current and former smoking and an increase with previous statin therapy.

Protective effect of the CYP2C19 *17 polymorphism with increased activation of clopidogrel on cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND: The prodrug clopidogrel requires activation by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes for its antiplatelet effect. The genes encoding enzymes for clopidogrel activation are polymorphic, leading to reduced or increased function, depending on the respective genotype. Reduced-function alleles have been associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. METHODS: We tested the association of the presence of the ABCB1 (C/T) T-allele, CYP2C19*2 (G/A) A-allele, or CYP2C19*17 (C/T) T-allele with the primary end point of the need of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and the secondary end points of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; including death, myocardial infarction [MI], and TLR) at 1 year in a high-risk population of 928 patients with acute MI. RESULTS: Carriers of the CYP2C19*17 T-allele, with increased clopidogrel activation, had a 37% relative reduction in the TLR incidence, the primary end point (14.0% vs 22.3%, P = .002), and a 22% relative reduction of the secondary end point MACE (22.0% vs 28.1%, P = .04) compared with noncarriers, respectively. The association of the T-allele with TLR remained significant in the multivariate analysis (P = .001). The ABCB1 (C/T) and the CYP2C19*2 (G/A) polymorphisms were not associated with the incidence of TLR or MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the genetic analysis in a high-risk population of acute MI patients with interventional treatment and continuous clopidogrel therapy, our study found a protective effect for carriers of an increased-function CYP2C19*17 T-allele with significantly lower rates of TLR and MACE. T-allele carriers with acute MI and increased clopidogrel activation had significantly reduced clinical event rates.

High-frequency vibration for the recanalization of guidewire refractory chronic total coronary occlusions.

BACKGROUND: Recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) remains a clinical challenge, particularly when standard guidewire attempts fail. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of a novel method that used high-frequency (20 kHz) vibration to fragment occlusive fibrous tissue and facilitate guidewire crossing into the distal vessel. METHODS: A total of 125 patients with CTO, who failed at attempts of conventional guidewire recanalization after more than 5 min of fluoroscopy time, were enrolled in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was the advancement of the CROSSER catheter through the occlusion and attainment of coronary guidewire positioning in the distal coronary lumen. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, clinical perforation, or target vessel revascularization within the first 30 days. RESULTS: The average fluoroscopy time while delivering the CROSSER catheter was 12.4 min. CROSSER-assisted guidewire recanalization was achieved in 76 (60.8%) procedures and a final diameter stenosis <50% was obtained in 68 (54.4%) of cases. Major adverse events occurred in 11 (8.8%) patients, lower than the predefined objective performance criteria. Angina frequency and quality of life were improved in patients with successful guidewire recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that high-frequency vibration using the CROSSER catheter is a safe and effective therapy for patients with CTO, which are refractory to standard guidewire recanalization.

Minor defects of the luminal integrity in arterial introducer eSheaths after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Medical devices such as implant delivery systems are commonly used during minimally invasive procedures in the cardiovascular system. These devices often have lubricious polymer coatings to reduce friction between the device and blood vessels but coatings may separate and potentially cause serious injuries to patients. METHODS: Lubricious coated eSheaths for transcatheter heart valve implantation were assessed for luminal integrity at the proximal, medial and distal part. We assessed the number, depths and area of luminal trails using environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM), white light interferometry (WLI) and optical profilometry using area scale fractal complexity (asfc) as surface parameters. A total of 15 eSheaths were retrieved and analyzed after successful femoral transcatheter Sapien 3 implantation in patients (23 mm valve- 14F eSheath, 26 mm valve- 14F eSheath and 29 mm valve- 16F eSheath, n = 5 for each group). Unused eSheaths (14F and 16F) served as controls (n = 5 for each group). RESULTS: ESEM revealed significantly greater number of trails after TAVR passage with the 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm valves compared to unused control 14F and 16F eSheaths (13.9 ± 3.1, 14.2 ± 2.3, 15.8 ± 1.7 vs. 0.08 ± 0.1 and 1.0 ± 0.5 [n]; p ≤ 0.0001 for all comparisons). Similarly, WLI showed minor, but significantly greater areas of luminal defects after 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm valve implantation vs. 14F and 16F unused controls (7.5 ± 0.9, 10.3 ± 1.1, 10.4 ± 1.4 vs. 4.1 ± 0.4 and 2.2 ± 0.4 [µm2], p = 0.0081). Likewise, the 3D-surface-measurement showed comparable results after implantation of the 23 mm, 26 mm and 29 mm valves vs. 14F and 16F unused control eSheaths (79.5 ± 6.3, 105.9 ± 5.3, 98.8 ± 4.8 vs. 5.1 ± 2.8 and 5.6 ± 0.5 [asfc] p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Measurable defects of the luminal layer occur during balloon expandable TAVR using 14F and 16F eSheaths though this is likely clinically insignificant. Further clinical investigations including a prospective assessment of minor peripheral embolization are needed to fully address the impact of this luminal defects.

Three-year efficacy and safety of new- versus early-generation drug-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease insights from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: In percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) has reduced adverse events in comparison to early-generation DES. The aim of the current study was to investigate the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of new-generation DES versus early-generation DES for PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery (uLMCA) disease. METHODS: The patient-level data from the ISAR-LEFT MAIN and ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 randomized trials were pooled. The clinical outcomes of PCI patients assigned to new-generation DES (everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stent) versus early-generation DES (paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stent) were studied. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization and stroke (MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event). RESULTS: In total, 1257 patients were available. At 3 years, the risk of MACCE was comparable between patients assigned to new-generation DES or early-generation DES (28.2 versus 27.5 %, hazard ratio-HR 1.03, 95 % confidence intervals-CI 0.83-1.26; P = 0.86). Definite/probable stent thrombosis was low and comparable between new-generation DES and early-generation DES (0.8 versus 1.6 %, HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.18-1.57; P = 0.25); in patients treated with new-generation DES no cases occurred beyond 30 days. Diabetes increased the risk of MACCE in patients treated with new-generation DES but not with early-generation DES (P interaction = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: At 3-year follow-up, a PCI with new-generation DES for uLMCA disease shows comparable efficacy to early-generation DES. Rates of stent thrombosis were low in both groups. Diabetes significantly impacts the risk of MACCE at 3 years in patients treated with new-generation DES for uLMCA disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00133237; NCT00598637.

Changes of the eSheath Outer Dimensions Used for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Innovative catheter systems with lower-profile sheaths and a dynamic expansion mechanism (DEM) were recently introduced for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the labeling of 14 F and 16 F eSheaths denote the inner nominal diameter. Exact changes of the clinically relevant outer diameters during usage are not available. eSheaths were measured every 30 mm using a digital caliper. Unused 14 F and 16 F eSheaths served as controls. Maximum eSheath diameters were measured after insertion of the Edwards Commander Delivery System (ECDS) into 14 F and 16 F eSheaths.Finally, eSheaths were retrieved and measured after TAVR. Outer diameters of control 14 F eSheaths were 5.8 mm and 6.50 mm for the 16 F eSheath. Introduction of the 23 mm and 26 mm ECDS into 14 F eSheaths showed a maximum diameter of 7.65 mm and 7.64 mm (P = NS). Introduction of the 29 mm ECDS into the 16 F eSheath showed the greatest diameter of 8.18 mm (P = 0.03). After TAVR, diameters of the 14 F eSheaths were 7.14 mm (23 mm valve) and 7.26 mm (26 mm valve) (P = NS), while 16 F eSheaths were 8.10 mm (29 mm valve) (P ≤ 0.03). Nominal 14 F and 16 F eSheaths showed a significant increase of the outer diameter during advancement of the ECDS and after TAVR implantation.

"First-in-man" MitraClip via pulmonary vein access through a right mini-thoracotomy in a patient with agenesis of the inferior vena cava.

AIMS: Transcatheter mitral valve repair has become a promising alternative treatment option for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation in patients at high risk for open heart surgery with heart-lung bypass. METHODS AND RESULTS: We describe the first successful procedure of mitral clipping through a right lateral mini-thoracotomy via the right upper pulmonary vein in a patient with an agenesis of the inferior vena cava. The set-up of the MitraClip system on a separate table located at 70¡ on the right side of the patient and the fixation of the steerable sheath at the entry into the thorax with constant posterior pressure enabled clip implantation using the usual manoeuvres with marked reduction of the mitral insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The access through the right upper pulmonary vein using the usual right mini-thoracotomy enabled a successful mitral clipping even in the absence or occlusion of the inferior vena cava.

Intraprocedural reduction of the veno-arterial norepinephrine gradient correlates with blood pressure response after renal denervation.

AIMS: No intraprocedural assessment is currently available to evaluate the extent of nerve ablation by renal denervation (RDN). We prospectively evaluated the association of intraprocedural reduction of renal veno-arterial norepinephrine gradient with blood pressure (BP) response after RDN. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 46 consecutive RDN patients, the periprocedural norepinephrine veno-arterial difference was defined as veno-arterial norepinephrine gradient. We observed a reduction of the office systolic BP from 176±19 mmHg to 165±24 mmHg (p=0.02) at three months and 163±22 mmHg (p=0.02) at six months. The mean and maximum systolic ABP decreased by 5 mmHg (p=0.03) and 9 mmHg (p=0.02), respectively. There was a decrease of the norepinephrine RV-RA difference from pre- to post-procedural levels (median 186 pg/ml [54;466] vs. 81 pg/ml [0;182], p=0.02). OBP responders (office systolic BP reduction ≥10 mmHg) showed a greater reduction of the norepinephrine gradient compared to non-responders (-290±450 pg/ml vs. -4±106 pg/ml, p=0.01). Patients with a reduction of norepinephrine gradient in both kidneys showed the most pronounced decrease of the systolic OBP (-24±14 mmHg) compared to patients with a reduction of norepinephrine gradient in only one kidney (-7±15 mmHg) or patients without a norepinephrine reduction (-3±19 mmHg, p=0.03 vs. bilateral reduction). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring renal norepinephrine gradient during RDN may be a method to gauge the extent of renal nerve ablation.

Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography.

Current guidelines favor the radial approach for coronary angiography. Therefore, specialty radial diagnostic catheters were designed to engage both coronary arteries with a single device. However, it is unclear if single catheters are superior to conventional catheters. A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive right radial coronary angiographies to determine catheter use, fluoroscopy time, radiation dosage, and consumption of contrast. Procedures were performed with a single TIG catheter or conventional catheters (CONV). Procedures with coronary artery bypass grafts or ventricular angiographies were excluded. 273 transradial procedures were performed successfully. 95 procedures were performed with CONV and 178 procedures with a TIG. Crossover to additional catheters was higher in TIG (15.2%) compared to CONV (5.3%, p = 0.02). Fluoroscopy time was comparable between CONV and TIG, without crossover (2.2 ± 1.2 min versus 2.3 ± 1.2 min; n.s.), however, greater in the case of crossover for CONV (5.8 ± 0.7) and TIG (7.6 ± 3.0; p = 0.0001). Radiation dosage was similar in CONV and the TIG, without crossover (1419 ± 1075, cGy∗cm(2) versus 1690 ± 1138; n.s.), however, greater for CONV (2374 ± 620) and TIG (3733 ± 2281, p = 0.05) with crossover. Overall, the amount of contrast was greater in TIG (56 ± 13 mL) versus CONV (48 ± 3 mL; p = 0.0003). CONV femoral catheters may be the primary choice for radial approach.

How should I treat dislocation of a TAVI SAPIEN prosthesis into the left ventricle?

BACKGROUND: Despite the technical advancements of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure, valve embolisation into the left ventricle remains a challenging situation requiring expedited management through the Heart Team. INVESTIGATION: The advantages and pitfalls of an interventional transfemoral approach, a transapical extraction of the dislocated prosthesis or the conversion to open heart surgery have to be balanced depending on the overall situation and the specific characteristics of the patient. DIAGNOSIS: A transfemoral approach would be the first choice for most TAVI implanters. We discuss the different options and present an elegant solution solving this challenging situation, leading to a good immediate and long-term outcome. MANAGEMENT: Attempts at pulling the prosthesis out of the ventricle using a balloon remained unsuccessful. After grasping of the prosthesis with a goose-neck snare, the valve was pulled into the annulus. A second SAPIEN XT prosthesis was implanted and fixed the first prosthesis within the annulus. After post-dilatation, there was a good result without relevant gradient and minimal aortic regurgitation.