Enhancing endoscopic measurement: validating a quantitative method for polyp size and location estimation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of polyps size is crucial in predicting malignancy, planning relevant intervention strategies and surveillance schedules. Endoscopists' visual estimations can lack precision. This study builds on our prior research, with the aim to evaluate a recently developed quantitative method to measure the polyp size and location accurately during a simulated endoscopy session. METHODS: The quantitative method merges information about endoscopic positions obtained from an electromagnetic tracking sensor, with corresponding points on the images of the segmented polyp border. This yields real-scale 3D coordinates of the border of the polyp. By utilising the sensor, positions of any anatomical landmarks are attainable, enabling the estimation of a polyp's location relative to them. To verify the method's reliability and accuracy, simulated endoscopies were conducted in pig stomachs, where polyps were artificially created and assessed in a test-retest manner. The polyp measurements were subsequently compared against clipper measurements. RESULTS: The average size of the fifteen polyps evaluated was approximately 12 ± 4.3 mm, ranging from 5 to 20 mm. The test-retest reliability, measured by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for polyp size estimation, demonstrated an absolute agreement of 0.991 (95% CI 0.973-0.997, p < 0.05). Bland & Altman analysis revealed a mean estimation difference of - 0.17 mm (- 2.03%) for polyp size and, a mean difference of - 0.4 mm (- 0.21%) for polyp location. Both differences were statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). When comparing the proposed method with calliper measurements, the Bland & Altman plots showed 95% of size estimation differences between - 1.4 and 1.8 mm (- 13 to 17.4%) which was not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method of measurements of polyp size and location was found to be highly accurate, offering great potential for clinical implementation to improve polyp assessment. This level of performance represents a notable improvement over visual estimation technique used in clinical practice.

Prevalence and Sonographic Detection of Gallbladder Polyps in a Western European Population.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer is rare but associated with significant morbidity and mortality necessitating the early identification of premalignant and malignant lesions to improve overall prognosis. Despite limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of transabdominal ultrasound (US) in the detection of gallbladder polyps, it plays a key role in current European guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate gallbladder polyp prevalence in a western European population and assess the diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal US. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent cholecystectomy for US detected gallbladder polypoid lesions at four hospitals in Ireland and the United Kingdom between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively collected. Patient demographics, ultrasonographic, and histopathologic findings were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients underwent cholecystectomy for US-detected gallbladder polyps. After histopathologic examination, pseudopolyps were found in 75 (56%) specimens with dysplastic or malignant polyps seen in only six (4.5%) specimens. Mean size for neoplastic polyps was 33 mm. The positive predictive value for US in detecting neoplastic polyps in this study was 4.5%, which is significantly lower than the 10%-15% reported previously. CONCLUSIONS: Although the prevalence of neoplastic polyps in this study is higher than in the previous literature, the distribution of pseudopolyps and true polyps is as expected. With all malignant polyps being >10 mm in diameter, these findings support the current size thresholds stated in European guidelines. The poor diagnostic accuracy of US demonstrated may have led to significant number of patients undergoing unnecessary surgical intervention, further supporting the argument for improved strategies for the investigation of gallbladder polyps.

Endoscopic measurement of the size of gastrointestinal polyps using an electromagnetic tracking system and computer vision-based algorithm.

PURPOSE: Polyp size is an important factor that may influence diagnosis and clinical management decision, but estimation by visual inspection during endoscopy is often difficult and subject to error. The purpose of this study is to develop a quantitative approach that enables an accurate and objective measurement of polyp size and to study the feasibility of the method. METHODS: We attempted to estimate polyp size and location relative to the gastro-oesophageal junction by integrating data from an electromagnetic tracking sensor and endoscopic images. This method is based on estimation of the three-dimensional coordinates of the borders of the polyp by combining the endoscope camera position and the corresponding points along the polyp border in endoscopic images using a computer vision-based algorithm. We evaluated the proposed method using a simulated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy model. RESULTS: The difference between the mean of ten measurements of one artificial polyp and its actual size (10 mm in diameter) was 0.86 mm. Similarly, the difference between the mean of ten measurements of the polyp distance from the gastroesophageal junction and its actual distance (~ 22 cm) was 1.28 mm. Our results show that the changes in camera positions in which the images were taken and the quality of the polyp segmentation have the most impact on the accuracy of polyp size estimation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated an innovative approach to endoscopic measurements using motion tracking technologies and computer vision and demonstrated its accuracy in determining the size and location of the polyp. The observed magnitude of error is clinically acceptable, and the measurements are available immediately after the images captured. To enhance accuracy, it is recommended to avoid identical images and instead utilise control wheels on the endoscope for capturing different views. Future work should further evaluate this innovative method during clinical endoscopic procedures.