Evaluation of the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome at the Emergency Department Based on the Lung Ultrasound Score.

OBJECTIVES: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a respiratory disease characterized by a high rate of mortality. Determining the prognosis of this disease is therefore important. Lung ultrasonography has found increased use, especially in the recent years. This study aimed to score patients diagnosed with ARDS at the emergency department using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-Lung and to investigate the prognosis of patients with ARDS using a scoring system. METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center prospective study. The study was performed in patients admitted to the emergency department and were diagnosed with ARDS pursuant to the Berlin criteria for ARDS and who met the inclusion criteria. The patients underwent lung ultrasonography at the emergency department and were scored (A line: 0; B1 line: 1; B2 line: 2; and C line: 3 points) accordingly. RESULTS: The study included 100 patients with ARDS. The mortality rate was 52% in the patients in the study. The lung ultrasonography score in the mortality group (25.48 ± 3.64) was higher than that in the survivors (8.46 ± 3.61). For a cut-off value of 17.5 for the lung ultrasonography score, the sensitivity and specificity with regard to mortality indicators were 92.8% and 90.9%, respectively (the area under the curve: 0.901; 95% confidence interval: 0.945-0.985: P < .001). CONCLUSION: The findings suggested that scoring based on POCUS-Lung at the time of initial presentation at the emergency department in patients diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin criteria could help determine the prognosis. As POCUS-Lung proved to be an important imaging method in investigating the affected alveolar capacity, we recommend its possible use as a prognostic indicator.

Evaluation of diagnostic efficiency of bedside cardiac ultrasonography performed by emergency specialist.

BACKGROUND: In emergency medicine, ultrasound is frequently used in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and evaluation of treatment of critically ill patients simultaneously, due to its bedside applicability, rapidness and inexpensive cost. AIM: The competence of emergency physician in focused cardiac ultrasound evaluations and the success of diagnosing cardiac diseases were evaluated in a patient group presenting to the emergency department with complaints of non-traumatic chest pain and shortness of breath. METHODS: We included patients with complaints of chest pain and shortness of breath and underwent cardiac ultrasound performed by emergency physician. Then, patients were evaluated by a cardiologist. The diagnoses made by the emergency physician were compared with the diagnoses made by the cardiologist. RESULTS: A total of 303 patients were included. The diagnoses made by the emergency medicine specialist and cardiologist as a result of the evaluation were recorded as 56.7% vs 52.10% for acute coronary syndrome, 29.70% vs 31.60% for congestive heart failure, 3.6% vs 3.30% for pulmonary embolism, 2.1% vs 2.10% for hypertensive pulmonary edema, 1.9% vs 2.10% for pericarditis, and 0.60% vs 1.30% for aortic dissection. CONCLUSION: It was determined that focused cardiac ultrasound performed by emergency physician was sufficient in terms of accuracy of findings and diagnosis, and played an important role in excluding or including fatal diagnoses and conditions. The success rates of emergency physician can be further increased with long-term and comprehensive training programs.

Thrombolytic therapy delay is independent predictor of mortality in acute pulmonary embolism at emergency service.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Delays in diagnosis or therapy may result in sudden, fatal deterioration; therefore, rapid diagnosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach are needed. We aimed to investigate the effect of delaying thrombolytic administration on the mortality rate in a suspected PE. We retrospectively analyzed 49 consecutive patients who were aged 18 years or older and received thrombolysis for a high-risk PE without a major contraindication. All patients were classified according to the time of onset of the thrombolytic therapy. Patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest were analyzed from the time of admission to thrombolytic administration with 10-minute cutoff values. Data were analyzed by a regression analysis and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for significant and independent associated risk factors and in-hospital mortality. Mortality was seen in 17 of the 49 cases. Thirteen of these had received thrombolytic therapy 1 hour after their emergency department (ED) admission. Among all cases, the mortality rate was 35%. The ROC analysis indicated that a > 97-second delayed thrombolytic administration time was associated with mortality with 53% sensitivity and 91% specificity (area under the curve, 0.803; 95% confidence interval, 0.668-0.938). In the logistic regression, a 5-minute delay in thrombolytic therapy (beta = 1.342; 95% confidence interval, 1.818-2.231; p = 0.001) was associated with in-hospital mortality in the multivariable model. No major bleeding complications were seen in PE survivors. We conclude that early onset thrombolytic therapy in the ED for high-risk and hemodynamically worsening patients appears safe and life-saving.