Long-term and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open resection following tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The benefits of laparoscopic surgery over open surgery are well documented; however, the suitability of laparoscopic surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical benefits of laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer after tube decompression. METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery vs. open surgery for curative resection after tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer at our hospital between January, 2007 and March, 2018. RESULTS: This study comprised 67 patients: 29 patients who underwent open surgery and 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery. The morbidity within 30 days after surgery was comparable between the groups. The 3-year overall survival rates of the open and laparoscopic groups were 83.3 and 79.4%, respectively (p = 0.6244), and the 3-year disease-free survival rates were 59.3 and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.3200). Multivariate analysis showed that nodal stage (p = 0.021) was an independent prognostic factor for OS and sex (p = 0.010) and side-ness (p = 0.048) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: If adequate decompression is achieved, laparoscopic resection following tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer can be a safe alternative to open surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: TAS-102 plus bevacizumab is an anticipated combination regimen for patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer. However, evidence supporting its use for this indication is limited. We compared the cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab combination therapy with TAS-102 monotherapy for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. METHOD: Markov decision modeling using treatment costs, disease-free survival, and overall survival was performed to examine the cost-effectiveness of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab combination therapy and TAS-102 monotherapy. The Japanese health care payer's perspective was adopted. The outcomes were modeled on the basis of published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between the two treatment regimens was the primary outcome. Sensitivity analysis was performed and the effect of uncertainty on the model parameters were investigated. RESULTS: TAS-102 plus bevacizumab had an ICER of $21,534 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained compared with TAS-102 monotherapy. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that TAS-102 monotherapy was more cost-effective than TAS-102 and bevacizumab combination therapy at a willingness-to-pay of under $50,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: TAS-102 and bevacizumab combination therapy is a cost-effective option for patients who have metastatic colorectal cancer in the Japanese health care system.

[A study of the efficacy of high-dose toremifene in advanced and recurrent breast cancer].

Recently, many patients have been treated with aromatase inhibitors(AI), either in an adjuvant setting or as a treatment for recurrence. The efficacy and safety of high-dose toremifene(HD-TOR)were evaluated in 18 patients with advanced/recurrent breast cancer. Twelve of the 18 patients had received AI just prior to the study treatment. The clinical benefit rate was 56%(PR: 28%, long SD: 28%). Progression-free median survival was 5. 5 months. Adverse events were mild and toremifene was well-tolerated. The results suggest that HD-TOR should be considered early on as a second-line treatment, or as a later treatment option for AI-resistant breast cancer.

Bridge to Surgery for Obstructing Colonic Cancer: A Comparison between Right- and Left-sided Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have compared management and outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) for obstructive colonic cancer according to the location of the tumor. Additional information is needed about this procedure's characteristics and short-term and long-term outcomes. We aimed to compare patient and tumor characteristics, and outcomes of BTS for obstructive right-sided versus left-sided colonic cancers. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single center, cohort study. The study cohort comprised 149 patients, including 48 with right-sided and 101 with left-sided obstructive colonic cancers, who were treated with BTS between January 2007 and December 2017. Data on medical history, investigations, treatments, and prognosis were collected from an electronic database of a single hospital. The primary end points were overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival and short-term surgical outcomes. RESULTS: Significantly more patients with right-sided cancers had postoperative complications (29.2% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.039). Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy was administered to a marginally significantly greater proportion of patients with left-sided cancers (29.2% vs 45.5%, p = 0.057). The long-term outcomes were comparable between the two groups (the 5-year OS rates were 67.6% and 80.9% [p = 0.117] and the 5-year DFS rates were 62.2% and 58.6% [p = 0.671]). Multivariate analyses using all studied variables showed that lymphovascular invasion, advanced T stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome was not different between the right- and left-sided groups. In a BTS setting, postoperative complications may reduce the compliance of adjuvant chemotherapy in right-sided cancers and affect long-term outcomes.

[A case of advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastases successfully treated with TS-1/low-dose CDDP/lentinan combination chemotherapy].

We report herein a case of advanced gastric cancer successfully treated with TS-1/low-dose CDDP/Lentinan combination chemotherapy. A 74-year-old male suffering from anorexia was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed as having type 2 gastric cancer metastasizing to the liver. TS-1 was orally administered at 100 mg/body/day for 28 days with a 14-day interval as one session. During the second session, because grade 1 thrombocytopenia was noted, administration of TS-1 was rescheduled to every other day. CDDP was infused at 10 mg/body/day on day 6 to 10, 13, 15, and 17. After his discharge, CDDP at 10 mg/body and Lentinan at 2 mg/body were weekly infused as ambulant patient chemotherapy. The abdominal CT scan showed reduction of hepatic tumors by 86% in three months and 97% in 16 months. Metastatic lymph nodes disappeared in 4 months. The primary tumor was reduced and flattened to a cicatrix, and endoscopic biopsy revealed no cancer cells. The tumor markers, CEA (716.9 ng/ml) and CA 19-9 (57.2 U/ml), were reduced to normal range. The therapeutic efficacy was judged as a partial response (PR), which lasted for 16 months without severe adverse effects. He maintained good quality of life. This combination chemotherapy was thought to be beneficial for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

[Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for breast cancer].

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy has a significant effect in down-staging locally advanced breast cancer by providing a high dose intensity. It is also used for the treatment of liver metastasis. A better response rate and lower incidence of adverse effects are reported when patients are treated with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy than with systemic chemotherapy using the same dose of the same drugs. Recent advances in devices such as access ports and portable infusion pumps make it possible to perform intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy repeatedly and safely. However, it remains uncertain whether or not intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy can improve the prognosis of cancer patients because of the lack of data from phase III trials. Accordingly, further studies including combined use of systemic chemotherapy are mandatory to the control of micrometastases outside the target organ.

[Developments in endocrine therapy for breast cancer].

After the usefulness of ovariectomy in breast cancer patients was demonstrated, endocrine therapy has been one of the most effective treatments of breast cancer. Thereafter, it became clear that estrogen receptors (ERs) existed in the cells of breast cancer. After it was found that ERs could be used as a predictive factor of endocrine therapy for breast cancer, the validity of endocrine therapy has became more certain. Tamoxifen, a major selective estrogen receptor modulator, is the first agent which has shown evidence of improving survival time and disease-free survival time in the treatment of breast cancer, and is the standard treatment, widely used in the treatment of breast cancer all over the world. LH-RH analogue, commonly used in ablation treatment among premenopausal women, produces the same effect as ovariectomy, and recently has shown good results equivalent to chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer treatment. Furthermore, aromatase inhibitors as a form of ablation treatment of postmenopausal women have been used recently. In comparison with tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors have revealed the same or more effective result in postmenopausal breast cancer treatment. In the near future, endocrine mechanisms in the body and the molecular mechanisms of transcription by ER will be more clearly elucidated, and then new kinds of agent and combined therapies for the endocrine treatment of breast cancer will be developed. Currently, many clinical randomized trials are being conducted to examine the effectiveness of new endocrine treatment. Significant changes are occurring in the endocrine treatment of breast cancer.

[Four cases of gastric cancer with multiple hepatic metastases successfully treated with TS-1 in combination with low-dose cisplatinum].

We treated five cases for multiple hepatic metastases from gastric cancer with a novel combination of TS-1 and low-dose cisplatinum (CDDP). TS-1 was orally administered at 100 mg/body/day every day or only on weekdays, and 10 mg of CDDP was infused once or twice a week. The efficacy was evaluated by body CT after the treatment. The CT showed more than a 60% reduction of hepatic tumors in four patients. The tumor markers, CEA and CA19-9, were reduced to 10%. The response rate was 80%. Adverse reactions of grade 1 anemia were observed in two patients and grade 1 leucopenia in one patient. The liver function normalized in one patient. The hemoglobin level was increased from 6.8 g/dl to 11.8 g/dl in one patient. In conclusion, this combined chemotherapy of TS-1 and low-dose CDDP proved useful for advanced gastric cancer patients with multiple hepatic metastases, in view of its therapeutic efficacy, patients' quality of life and low toxicity.