Effects of RF Electric Currents on Hair Follicle Growth and Differentiation: A Possible Treatment for Alopecia.

Androgenic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of alopecia and its treatments involve drugs that have various adverse effects and are not completely effective. Radiofrequency-based therapies (RF) are an alternative for AGA treatment. Although there is increasing clinical evidence of the effectiveness of RF for alopecia, its effects at the tissue and cellular level have not been studied in detail. The objective of this study was to analyze ex vivo the potential effect of RF currents used in capacitive resistive electrical transfer (CRET) therapy on AGA. Hair follicles (HFs) were donated by patients with AGA and treated with CRET. AGA-HFs were exposed in vitro to intermittent 448 kHz electric current in subthermal conditions. Cell proliferation (Ki67), apoptosis (TUNEL assay), differentiation (ß-catenin), integrity (collagen and MMP9), thickness of the epidermis surrounding HF, proportion of bulge cells and melanoblasts in AGA-HF were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. CRET increased proliferation and decreased death of different populations of AGA-HF cells. In addition, the melanoblasts increased in bulge and the epidermis surrounding the hair follicle thickened. These results support the effectiveness of RF-based therapies for the treatment of alopecia. However, clinical trials are necessary to know the true effectiveness of CRET therapy and other RF therapies for AGA treatment.

Anti-Fibrotic Effects of RF Electric Currents.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are two different manifestations of excessive dermal fibrosis and are caused by an alteration in the normal wound-healing process. Treatment with radiofrequency (RF)-based therapies has proven to be useful in reducing hypertrophic scars. In this study, the effect of one of these radiofrequency therapies, Capacitive Resistive Electrical Transfer Therapy (CRET) on biomarkers of skin fibrosis was investigated. For this, in cultures of human myofibroblasts treated with CRET therapy or sham-treated, proliferation (XTT Assay), apoptosis (TUNEL Assay), and cell migration (Wound Closure Assay) were analyzed. Furthermore, in these cultures the expression and/or localization of extracellular matrix proteins such as α-SMA, Col I, Col III (immunofluorescence), metalloproteinases MMP1 and MMP9, MAP kinase ERK1/2, and the transcription factor NFκB were also investigated (immunoblot). The results have revealed that CRET decreases the expression of extracellular matrix proteins, modifies the expression of the metalloproteinase MMP9, and reduces the activation of NFκB with respect to controls, suggesting that this therapy could be useful for the treatment of fibrotic pathologies.

In vitro stimulation with radiofrequency currents promotes proliferation and migration in human keratinocytes and fibroblasts.

Capacitive-resistive electric transfer (CRET) therapies have been proposed as strategies for regeneration of cutaneous tissue lesions. Previous studies by our group have shown that intermittent stimulation with 448 kHz CRET currents at subthermal densities promotes in vitro proliferation of human stem cells involved in tissue regeneration. The present study investigates the effects of the in vitro exposure to these radiofrequency (RF) currents on the proliferation and migration of keratinocytes and fibroblasts, the main cell types involved in skin regeneration. The effects of the electric stimulation on cell proliferation and migration were studied through XTT and wound closure assays, respectively. The CRET effects on the expression and location of proteins involved in proliferation and migration were assessed by immunoblot and immunofluorescence. The obtained results reveal that electrostimulation promotes proliferation and/or migration in keratinocytes and fibroblasts. These effects would be mediated by changes observed in the expression and location of intercellular adhesion proteins such as ß-catenin and E-cadherin, of proteins involved in cell-to-substrate adhesion such as vinculin, p-FAK and the metalloproteinase MMP-9, and of other proteins that control both processes: MAP kinases p-p38, p-JUNK and p-ERK1/2. These responses could represent a mechanism underlying the promotion of normotrophic wound regeneration induced by CRET. Indeed, electric stimulation would favor completion of granulation tissue formation prior to the closure of the outer tissue layers, thus preventing abnormal wound cicatrization or chronification.

Electric currents of 448 kHz upregulate anti-senescence pathways in human dermal fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: Currently, finding new therapeutic strategies that reduce skin aging is a challenge for dermatologists and aesthetic doctors. In recent years, physical therapies have been included in the options for antiaging treatments; however, the biological bases of such treatments have scarcely been studied. One of these physical therapies is capacitive-resistive electric transfer (CRET) therapy. Previous studies have shown that subthermal treatment with CRET promotes the proliferation and migration of various cell types involved in skin regeneration, such as human ADSC (stem cells), fibroblasts, or keratinocytes. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effects of in vitro treatment with CRET-Std (standard, non-modulated signal) or CRET-Mod (modulated signal) on cell proliferation and migration, markers of aging, and extracellular matrix production. METHODS: Three types of human dermal fibroblasts were used: neonatal fibroblasts (HFn), replicative senescent fibroblasts (HFs), and adult fibroblasts (HFa). The effects of electric stimulation on cell proliferation and migration were studied through XTT and wound closure assays, respectively. The expression of the aging marker ß-galactosidase was assessed using a colorimetric assay, whereas immunoblot, immunofluorescence, and ELISAs were carried out to analyze the expression levels of migration, aging, and extracellular matrix proteins. RESULTS: The treatment with CRET-Std increased HFn and HFa proliferation, as well as migration in the three types of fibroblasts studied compared to those of the controls. Conversely, CRET-Mod did not modify either of these two processes with respect to the controls. Additionally, CRET-Std also reduced the cellular senescence markers ß-gal, vimentin, p53, and p21 in all three types of human skin fibroblasts. In addition, the application of CRET-Std also induced fibronectin production in HFn and was able to stimulate ECM neocollagenesis. CONCLUSION: CRET treatment improves a number of functions related to migration and proliferation, and it reduces age-related cellular changes in human dermal fibroblasts. Therefore, the use of this CRET therapy to reduce the signs of dermal aging and to promote tissue regeneration could be of interest.

Response of human cancer cells to simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and radiofrequency current.

Due to their alleged analgesic, anti-inflammatory and tissue regenerative effects, capacitive-resistive electrothermal therapy (CRET), which is based on non-invasive exposure to radiofrequency (RF) currents, is often applied to chemotherapeutically treated patients with cancer. Our previous studies have demonstrated that subthermal CRET currents can elicit a number of cell responses, including anti-proliferative effects, in the human liver cancer cell line HepG2. Such effects involve significant changes in the regulation of proteins involved in MAPK signaling pathways, which are also implicated in the cancer cell response to standard anticancer drugs such as sorafenib. This overlap in response pathways may lead to competitive, neutralizing or blocking interactions between the electrical and chemical treatments, thus raising questions on the advisability of CRET treatment for their analgesic, anti-inflammatory or other purposes in patients undergoing chemotherapy. The present study analyzed the effects of simultaneous treatment with sorafenib and 448-kHz, subthermal CRET current on the proliferation and viability of HepG2 cell cultures. Cell viability was assessed through Trypan blue or XTT assays, while flow cytometry was applied for cell cycle and apoptosis analysis. The expression of proteins involved in cell proliferation were assessed by immunoblotting and immunofluorescence. The results revealed no evidence to suggest that the electrical treatment counteracted or neutralized the cellular response to sorafenib at the different conditions evaluated. Furthermore, at the standard pharmacological sorafenib concentration, 5 µM, the combined treatment elicited an anti-proliferative response significantly stronger than that induced by each of the treatments when applied separately in HepG2 cells. These data do not support the hypothesis that CRET exposure may inhibit or diminish the effects of a chemotherapeutic drug used in cancer treatment, and highlights the requirement for further investigation into the cell response to the combined action of electrical and chemical treatments.