RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Information on anaphylaxis among recipients of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To identify the observed incidence of anaphylaxis in recipients of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. METHODS: A nationwide observational study among recipients of 61,414,803 doses of seven different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, describing the incidence and characteristics of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who developed anaphylaxis as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI) against SARS-CoV-2 vaccines between December 24, 2020, and October 15, 2021, in Mexico. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients developed anaphylaxis as an AEFI, for an overall observed incidence of 1.07 cases per 1,000,000 (95% CI 0.84-1.37) administered doses. Eighty-six percent of the patients were female, consistent with previous reports of AEFI to COVID-19 vaccines. mRNA-based vaccine recipients had the highest frequency of anaphylaxis, followed by adenovirus-vectored vaccines and inactivated virus recipients, with an observed incidence of 2.5, 0.7, and 0.2 cases per 1,000,000 doses administered, respectively. Only 46% of the patients received correct treatment with epinephrine as the first-line treatment through the appropriate route and dose. We detected one case of anaphylactic reaction-related death occurring 5 min following immunization with ChAdOx1 nCov-19 for a mortality rate of 1.5% among those who developed this AEFI. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, anaphylactic reactions were infrequent. Our study provides further evidence supporting the security of these newly developed vaccines.
Assuntos
Anafilaxia , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anafilaxia/induzido quimicamente , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/efeitos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , México/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute systemic vasculitis that predominantly affects patients younger than 5 years. In the absence of an available, affordable diagnostic test, detailed clinical history and physical examination are still fundamental to make a diagnosis. METHODS: We present five representative cases with KD-like presentations: systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, mycoplasma-induced rash and mucositis, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, BCGosis, and the recently described multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) virus. RESULTS: Rash, fever, and laboratory markers of inflammation can be present in several childhood diseases that may mimic KD. CONCLUSION: The term 'Kawasaki syndrome' instead of 'Kawasaki disease' may be more appropriate. Physicians should consider an alternative diagnosis that may mimic KD, particularly considering MIS-C during the present pandemic, as an aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic approach is needed.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos , Criança , Humanos , Síndrome de Linfonodos Mucocutâneos/diagnóstico , RNA Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória SistêmicaRESUMO
Proinflammatory cytokines and the novel myokine irisin, a cleavage product of FNDC5, have been found to play a role in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Irisin has been shown to increase browning of adipose tissue, thermogenesis, energy expenditure, and insulin sensitivity, yet its association with inflammatory markers is still limited. Circulating irisin has been found to be increased in obesity, while in adult subjects with T2DM decreased levels have been found. However, data establishing the association of circulating irisin in children and adolescents with T2DM has not been described in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine irisin plasma concentration and its association with metabolic and adiposity markers and with hs-CRP, a surrogate marker of inflammation used in clinical practice, in a pediatric population with T2DM. A cross-sample of 40 Mexican children and adolescents aged 7-17 were recruited, 20 diagnosed with T2DM and 20 healthy controls. Plasma irisin levels were found to be lower in the T2DM group compared with controls, which could be attributed to a reduced PGC-1α activity in muscle tissue with a consequent decrease in FNDC5 and irisin expression. Irisin concentration was found to be positively correlated with HDL-c, LDL-c, and total cholesterol, while negatively correlated with BMI, waist circumference, and triglycerides. However, after multiple regression analysis, only HDL-c correlation remained significant. hs-CRP was higher in the T2DM group and positively associated with adiposity markers, unfavorable lipid profile, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR, but no association with irisin was found. Given the favorable metabolic effects attributed to irisin, the low plasma levels found in children and adolescents with T2DM could exacerbate the inflammatory and metabolic imbalances and the intrinsic cardiovascular risk of this disease. We propose an "irisin-proinflammatory/anti-inflammatory axis" to explain the role of irisin as a metabolic regulator in obesity and T2DM.
Assuntos
Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Fibronectinas/sangue , Adolescente , Antropometria , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Coativador 1-alfa do Receptor gama Ativado por Proliferador de Peroxissomo/sangue , Triglicerídeos/sangue , Circunferência da CinturaRESUMO
Background: Apple (Malus domestica) is a fruit commonly associated with allergic oral symptoms in the Mexican pediatric population; however, knowledge of its allergenic proteins is limited. This information is crucial as sensitization frequencies to specific allergens can vary among different populations. The main allergic symptomatology before apple ingestion derives from primary sensitizations induced by pollen, promoting cross-reactivity with the main allergenic protein of apple. Therefore, this study aims to identify new potential sensitizing proteins to apple using immunoproteomic techniques. Methods: We collected serum samples from 14 pediatric patients with confirmed immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated apple allergy and used these samples to assess immunoreactivity to apple protein extracts through 2D-western blot assays. The spots corresponding to the 2D-SDS-PAGE were analyzed using nanoLC-MS/MS. Results: We identified 11 non-redundant proteins, including Mal d 2 and Mal d 1, the latter showing a high frequency of sensitization (79%) in our patients, and being considered the main apple allergenic protein. The remaining identified proteins have not been previously described as apple allergens in the International Union of Immunological Societies databases. However, three of these may be categorized as pan-allergens. Conclusions: This study shows evidence that the repertoire of apple allergens in the Mexican population could differ from those reported internationally, highlighting the importance of studies in different countries to improve the certainty of allergy diagnosis and allow the implementation of precision medicine.
Assuntos
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar , Imunoglobulina E , Malus , Proteínas de Plantas , Proteômica , Humanos , Malus/imunologia , Malus/química , Criança , México , Feminino , Masculino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Alérgenos/imunologia , Proteômica/métodos , Proteínas de Plantas/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Imunoglobulina E/sangue , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Frutas/imunologia , Frutas/química , Espectrometria de Massas em TandemRESUMO
Background: Human monkeypox, a zoonosis historically endemic to West and South Africa, has led to a worldwide outbreak driven by human-to-human transmission resulting in an international public health emergency. Endemic and outbreak monkeypox cases may differ in their affected populations, clinical features, and outcomes. Thus, profiling cases of the current monkeypox outbreak worldwide is crucial. Methods: We performed a nationwide observational surveillance-based study from May 24 to September 5, 2022. Patients that met the operational clinical definition of monkeypox or symptomatic close contacts of confirmed cases were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data were collected with a standardized case-report form. We report epidemiologic, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics of confirmed cases. Findings: Five-hundred and sixty-five human monkeypox confirmed cases were analysed; 97.2% were men, of whom 59.5% identified as men who have sex with men, and 54.5% had human immunodeficiency virus infection. The median age was 34 years. All patients but one had rash (99.8%), 78.9% had fever, and 47.8% reported myalgia. The anogenital area was the most commonly affected one by rash (49.6%), and proctitis occurred in 6.2% of patients. Six patients required hospitalization, of which one died due to causes unrelated to monkeypox. Interpretation: The 2022 monkeypox outbreak in Mexico is mainly driven by middle-aged men who have sex with men, of which a large proportion are persons who live with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clinical features such as the high proportion of anogenital lesions suggest sexual contact is a pivotal transmission mechanism in this outbreak. Funding: This research was supported by grant A1-S-18342 from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Mexico (to S.I.V.-F.).
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite the high number of vaccines administered against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide, the information on the psychological/psychiatric adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with these newly developed vaccines remains scarce. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of psychological/psychiatric symptoms among recipients of five different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and to explore the factors associated with their development reported in the nationwide Mexican registry of AEFI against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Descriptive study of all the psychological/psychiatric symptoms, including anxiety, panic attacks, insomnia, and agitation reported to the Mexican Epidemiological Surveillance System from 21 December 2020 to 27 April 2021, among adult (≥18 years old) recipients of 7,812,845 doses of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCov-19, rAd26-rAd5, Ad5-nCoV, or CoronaVac. The factors associated with their development are determined by multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19,163 AEFI reports during the study period; amongst them, 191 (1%) patients had psychological/psychiatric symptoms (median age of 41 years, interquartile range of 32-54; 149 [78%] women) for an observed incidence of 2.44 cases per 100,000 administered doses (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.12-2.82), 72.8% of psychiatric AEFIs were reported among recipients of BNT162b2. The median time from vaccination to symptom onset was 35 min (interquartile range: 10-720). Overall, the most common psychological/psychiatric symptoms were anxiety in 129 (67.5%) patients, panic attacks in 30 (15.7%), insomnia in 25 (13%), and agitation in 11 (5.7%). After adjusting for the confounding factors, the odds for developing psychological/psychiatric symptoms were higher for those concurrently reporting syncope (odds ratio [OR]: 4.73, 95% CI: 1.68-13.33); palpitations (OR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.65-3.70), and dizziness (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.10-2.28). CONCLUSION: In our population, psychological/psychiatric symptoms were extremely infrequent AEFIs. No severe psychiatric AEFIs were reported. Immunization stress-related responses might explain most of the detected cases.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To clinically characterize the events of anaphylaxis in a third-level pediatric hospital. METHODS: 1148 clinical records were reviewed. Eventually, the information of 35 events of anaphylaxis in 20 patients was analyzed; three of them had multiple episodes of anaphylaxis. RESULTS: The median age for the anaphylactic episodes was 11 years (Interquartile range 10 years, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), predominantly in adolescents between the ages of 12 and 17 years, and there was a slight predominance in women. The most frequent clinical manifestations were cutaneous (86%), followed by respiratory (83%), cardiovascular (74%), and gastrointestinal (46%) alterations. Cardiac arrest was documented in three episodes; however, no anaphylaxis-related deaths were reported. The main triggers for anaphylaxis were food (34%), medications (29%), allergen-specific immunotherapy (14%), and latex (11%). In patients with perioperative anaphylaxis, the clinical behavior was severe. Epinephrine was administered in 27 out of the 35 events (77%), but only in 11 cases it was the first-line treatment. Systemic corticosteroids were the most frequently used treatment, followed by epinephrine and antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: The use of epinephrine, which is the mainstay of the treatment, is suboptimal; with a preferred use of second-line medications like corticosteroids. Clear protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis, as well as continuous education of health personnel, are necessary.
Objetivo: Caracterizar clínicamente los eventos de anafilaxia en un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel. Métodos: Se revisaron 1148 expedientes clínicos. Finalmente, se analizó la información correspondiente a 35 episodios de anafilaxia en 20 pacientes; tres de ellos con múltiples episodios de anafilaxia. Resultados: La edad mediana de los episodios de anafilaxia fue de 11 años (rango intercuartilar 10 años, Q1 = 5, Q3 = 15), con predomino en adolescentes de 12 a 17 años y del sexo femenino. Las manifestaciones clínicas más frecuentes fueron las cutáneas (86 %), seguidas de las respiratorias (83 %), las cardiovasculares (74 %) y las gastrointestinales (46 %). En tres casos se documentó paro cardiorrespiratorio, pero no hubo casos de mortalidad asociada a anafilaxia. Los principales desencadenantes fueron alimentos (34 %), medicamentos (29 %), inmunoterapia para alérgenos (14 %) y látex (11 %). En los pacientes con anafilaxia perioperatoria el comportamiento clínico fue grave. La adrenalina se utilizó en 27 de los 35 episodios (77 %), en 11 de ellos fue el tratamiento de primera elección. Los corticosteroides sistémicos fueron los medicamentos más frecuentemente utilizados, seguidos de la adrenalina y los antihistamínicos. Conclusiones: El uso de adrenalina, pilar del tratamiento de anafilaxia, es subóptimo; con uso preferente de medicamentos de segunda línea como los corticosteroides. Se requieren protocolos para diagnóstico y tratamiento de anafilaxia, aunado a una educación continua del personal de salud.