Characterization of inflammatory bowel disease management by vedolizumab and concomitant treatments in real-life clinical practice.

Limited data is available on vedolizumab combination therapies in real-world clinical practice. Here, we evaluated the concomitant corticosteroid, immunosuppressive, and 5-aminosalicylic acid utilization of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with vedolizumab in a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centres with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since it's availability in Finland were included in the study. Data were collected from medical charts at baseline (vedolizumab treatment initiation), week 14, and month 6. The majority of patients who used corticosteroids at the baseline and persisted on vedolizumab treatment for 6 months were taken off corticosteroid treatment by the 6-month time point (CD, 54.5%; UC, 69.8%). Modest corticosteroid dose reductions were observed among treatment persistent CD patients from the baseline until month 6. Corticosteroid users had less vedolizumab discontinuations due to primary ineffectiveness and more discontinuations due to adverse events than patients not using corticosteroids. Vedolizumab may have a corticosteroid sparing effect in real-world clinical practice. Concomitant corticosteroid use may lead to a lower rate of vedolizumab discontinuation due to primary ineffectiveness, but a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events.

High treatment persistence rate and significant endoscopic healing among real-life patients treated with vedolizumab - a Finnish Nationwide Inflammatory Bowel Disease Cohort Study (FINVEDO).

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and tolerability of vedolizumab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has been demonstrated in an extensive GEMINI clinical trial programme. Clinical trials represent highly selected patient populations and, therefore, it is important to demonstrate effectiveness in real-life clinical practice. We set out to assess real-world treatment outcomes of vedolizumab in a nationwide cohort of treatment refractory Finnish Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. METHODS: This was a nationwide, retrospective, non-interventional, multi-centre chart review study. All adult patients from 27 Finnish gastroenterology centers with a diagnosis of UC or CD who had at least one vedolizumab infusion since the availability of the product in Finland, were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical charts at baseline, week 14, and month 6. The primary outcome measure was treatment persistence 24 weeks post-vedolizumab initiation. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were included (108 CD, 139 UC). A total of 75.0% (n = 81) of all CD patients and 66.2% (n = 92) of all UC patients, were persistent on vedolizumab therapy for 6 months post treatment initiation. At month 6, 41.8% (28/67) of the treatment persistent CD patients and 73.3% (63/86) of the treatment persistent UC patients achieved clinical remission. Significant improvement in endoscopic scores were observed among treatment persistent patients (CD, n = 17, ΔSES-CD=-5.5, p = .008; UC, n = 26, ΔMayo endoscopic score =-0.5, p = .003) at month 6. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab provides an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in real-world clinical practice even among treatment refractory IBD patients.

Histopathology of gastric erosions. Association with etiological factors and chronicity.

BACKGROUND: The histopathologic characteristics of the antral erosions, and a comparison with samples systematically collected from the background antral mucosa, have not been studied previously. Similarly, unknown is the association of these features with suspected etiological factors and chronicity of erosion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 117 patients with gastric erosions in the absence of peptic ulcer disease. With 28 patients available for a follow-up 19 years later, sites of erosions and background mucosa were biopsied and histopathology of both independently assessed at both visits. Helicobacter pylori status was examined from the biopsies taken in the initial and follow-up gastroscopies. Only subjects originally displaying antral erosions were included. The presence of Herpes simplex virus (HSV) antibodies was analyzed and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) was inquired. RESULTS: Initially, the inflammation was more active in the region of erosions than elsewhere in antral mucosa. More active inflammation in the erosion was associated with HSV seropositivity, Helicobacter pylori infection, and the recent use of NSAIDs. In the follow-up visit, antral erosions were present in 38% (3/8) of Helicobacter pylori negatives and in 35% (7/20) of positives (p = ns). The Helicobacter pylori positive subjects with chronic or recurrent erosions had initially higher scores of neutrophils compared to subjects with nonrecurrent or nonchronic erosions (2.7 ± 0.5 vs 1.2 ± 1.0; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Focally enhanced inflammation is characteristic for gastric erosions. This focal inflammation was associated with HSV seropositivity or NSAID use suggesting that such inflammation may be important in the pathogenesis of gastric antral erosions. Highly active inflammation in the erosions associates with their chronicity.

Evolution of gastritis in patients with gastric erosions.

OBJECTIVE: Gastric erosions are mainly associated with Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but there has been no information available on the long-term evolution of gastritis in subjects with erosions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A series of 117 patients with gastric erosions without peptic ulcer disease and matched controls without erosions or ulcers were studied. Available subjects underwent endoscopy and biopsy 17 years later. Parietal cell antibodies were analysed at the first visit. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients and 67 controls were available for follow-up. Since H. pylori was a major determinant of gastritis, only subjects with unchanged H. pylori status were included in the evaluation of gastritis progression. At the follow-up visit, gastric erosions were present in 38% (16/42) of the patients and 11% (5/46) of the controls (p=0.005). In H. pylori-negative subjects, no evolution of histological changes was seen. In H. pylori-positive subjects, body gastritis was initially less active in the erosion group. With time, antral gastritis worsened only in the erosion group. Parietal cell antibodies were more common in the control group (23%; erosion patients 0%; p=0.01), which also showed worsening of gastritis (p=0.003) and aggravation of atrophy (p=0.002) in the body mucosa. CONCLUSIONS: Gastritis in H. pylori-positive subjects with gastric erosions shows evolution of antral predominance, body predominance including development of atrophic changes being rare. Accordingly, patients with erosions share the characteristics of gastritis of the duodenal ulcer phenotype. These findings support the importance of H. pylori and acid in the pathogenesis of gastric erosions in H. pylori-positive patients.