RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Analyze evolution Renal Chronic Failure stage 4-5 (ACRF) patients and influence information they receive (educational process, EP) in modality Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) or conservative treatment (CT) in multidisciplinar ACRF Office. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study (3 centers). Inclusion: from June-01-2014 to October-01-2015; observation: 12 months or until start RRT or death if they occur before 12 months; ends October-01-2016. RESULTS: 336 patients were included (60% males), median and intercuartile rank 71.5 (17), 55% ≥ 70 years; Follow up initiation eGFR CKD-EPI: 21 (9) ml / min / 1.73m2; Charlson Index (ChI) with / without age 8 (3) / 4 (2); Diabetic patients: 52,4%. The EP was carried out in 168, eGFR 15 (10) ml / min / 1.73m2. The initial treatment election: 26% peritoneal dialysis (PD), 45% hemodyalisis (HD), 26% CT, kidney trasplant 3%; 60 patients started RRT: 3.3% kidney traspant; 30% PD, 66% HD; 104 admissions in 73 patients, the most frequent cause: cardiovascular disease (42%). Fallecimiento: 23 patients (6.8%). Age was higher (78.4 (6) vs. 67.8 (13.4), P<.001), higher ChI 9.8 (2.1) vs. 7.4 (2.5), P<.001). All deceased who received EP had chosen CT; 61% of deceased had at least one hospital admission vs. 39% alive (P<0.001). Cox regression: age and Charlson index were the predictive mortality variables. CONCLUSIONS: The population of ACRF patients is elder, comorbid, with high rate hospitalizations rate. The PD election is higher than usual. The EP has been very useful tool and has favored the PD choice.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Diálise Renal , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS: Conocer evolución de pacientes ERC estadios 4 y 5 (ERCA) e influencia de la información (proceso educativo [PE]) que reciben para elección de la modalidad de tratamiento renal sustitutivo (TRS) o tratamiento conservador (TC) en consulta multidisciplinar de ERCA. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico (3 centros españoles). Pacientes incidentes: consulta ERCA desde el 1 de junio del 2014 al 1 de octubre del 015; observación: 12 meses o inicio del TRS o fallecimiento si antes de los 12 meses; finaliza el 1 de octubre del 2016. RESULTADOS: Trescientos treinta y tres pacientes (60% varones), mediana y rango intercuartil: edad 71,5 (17) años (55% ≥ 70 años), FGe CKD-EPI inicio 21 (9) ml/min/1,73 m2, índice de Charlson (ICh) con/sin edad 8 (3)/4 (2). Pacientes diabéticos: 52,4%. Recibieron PE 168 pacientes, FGe al inicio 15 (10) ml/min/1,73 m2. Tratamiento inicial elegido: 26% diálisis peritoneal (DP), 45% hemodiálisis (HD), 26% TC, trasplante renal 3%; 60 pacientes iniciaron TRS: 3,3% trasplante renal, 30% DP, 66% HD. Ingresos: 104 en 73 pacientes, la causa más frecuente fue por enfermedad cardiovascular (42%). Fallecimiento: 23 pacientes (6,8%), de mayor edad (78,4 [6] vs. 67,8 [13,4], p < 0,001), ICh más elevado 9,8 [2,1] vs. 7,4 [2,5], p < 0,001). Todos los fallecidos con PE habían decidido TC; el 61% de los fallecidos tenían al menos un ingreso hospitalario vs. 39%vivos (p < 0,001). Regresión Cox: variables predictivas mortalidad: edad e ICh. CONCLUSIONES:La población de ERCA es añosa, comórbida y con elevado índice de ingresos hospitalarios. La incidencia de DP es mayor a la habitual. El PE ha sido una herramienta de gran utilidad y favorece la elección de DP
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Analyze evolution Renal Chronic Failure stage 4-5 (ACRF) patients and influence information they receive (educational process, EP) in modality Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) or conservative treatment (CT) in multidisciplinar ACRF Office. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study (3 centers). Inclusion: from June-01-2014 to October-01-2015; observation: 12 months or until start RRT or death if they occur before 12 months; ends October-01-2016. RESULTS: 336 patients were included (60% males), median and intercuartile rank 71.5 (17), 55% ≥ 70 years; Follow up initiation eGFR CKD-EPI: 21 (9) ml / min / 1.73m2; Charlson Index (ChI) with / without age 8 (3) / 4 (2); Diabetic patients: 52,4%. The EP was carried out in 168, eGFR 15 (10) ml / min / 1.73 m2. The initial treatment election: 26% peritoneal dialysis (PD), 45% hemodyalisis (HD), 26% CT, kidney trasplant 3%; 60 patients started RRT: 3.3% kidney traspant; 30% PD, 66% HD; 104 admissions in 73 patients, the most frequent cause: cardiovascular disease (42%). Fallecimiento: 23 patients (6.8%). Age was higher (78.4 (6) vs. 67.8 (13.4), P < .001), higher ChI 9.8 (2.1) vs. 7.4 (2.5), P < .001). All deceased who received EP had chosen CT; 61% of deceased had at least one hospital admission vs. 39% alive (P < 0.001). Cox regression: age and Charlson index were the predictive mortality variables. CONCLUSIONS: The population of ACRF patients is elder, comorbid, with high rate hospitalizations rate. The PD election is higher than usual. The EP has been very useful tool and has favored the PD choice
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Terapia de Substituição Renal/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/métodos , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/tendênciasRESUMO
No disponible