HtrC is involved in proteolysis of YpeB during germination of Bacillus anthracis and Bacillus subtilis spores.

Bacterial endospores can remain dormant for decades yet can respond to nutrients, germinate, and resume growth within minutes. An essential step in the germination process is degradation of the spore cortex peptidoglycan wall, and the SleB protein in Bacillus species plays a key role in this process. Stable incorporation of SleB into the spore requires the YpeB protein, and some evidence suggests that the two proteins interact within the dormant spore. Early during germination, YpeB is proteolytically processed to a stable fragment. In this work, the primary sites of YpeB cleavage were identified in Bacillus anthracis, and it was shown that the stable products are comprised of the C-terminal domain of YpeB. Modification of the predominant YpeB cleavage sites reduced proteolysis, but cleavage at other sites still resulted in loss of full-length YpeB. A B. anthracis strain lacking the HtrC protease did not generate the same stable YpeB products. In B. anthracis and Bacillus subtilis htrC mutants, YpeB was partially stabilized during germination but was still degraded at a reduced rate by other, unidentified proteases. Purified HtrC cleaved YpeB to a fragment similar to that observed in vivo, and this cleavage was stimulated by Mn(2+) or Ca(2+) ions. A lack of HtrC did not stabilize YpeB or SleB during spore formation in the absence of the partner protein, indicating other proteases are involved in their degradation during sporulation.

Conserved structural elements specialize ATAD1 as a membrane protein extraction machine.

The mitochondrial AAA (ATPase Associated with diverse cellular Activities) protein ATAD1 (in humans; Msp1 in yeast) removes mislocalized membrane proteins, as well as stuck import substrates from the mitochondrial outer membrane, facilitating their re-insertion into their cognate organelles and maintaining mitochondria's protein import capacity. In doing so, it helps to maintain proteostasis in mitochondria. How ATAD1 tackles the energetic challenge to extract hydrophobic membrane proteins from the lipid bilayer and what structural features adapt ATAD1 for its particular function has remained a mystery. Previously, we determined the structure of Msp1 in complex with a peptide substrate (Wang et al., 2020). The structure showed that Msp1's mechanism follows the general principle established for AAA proteins while adopting several structural features that specialize it for its function. Among these features in Msp1 was the utilization of multiple aromatic amino acids to firmly grip the substrate in the central pore. However, it was not clear whether the aromatic nature of these amino acids were required, or if they could be functionally replaced by aliphatic amino acids. In this work, we determined the cryo-EM structures of the human ATAD1 in complex with a peptide substrate at near atomic resolution. The structures show that phylogenetically conserved structural elements adapt ATAD1 for its function while generally adopting a conserved mechanism shared by many AAA proteins. We developed a microscopy-based assay reporting on protein mislocalization, with which we directly assessed ATAD1's activity in live cells and showed that both aromatic amino acids in pore-loop 1 are required for ATAD1's function and cannot be substituted by aliphatic amino acids. A short α-helix at the C-terminus strongly facilitates ATAD1's oligomerization, a structural feature that distinguishes ATAD1 from its closely related proteins.

The Mars1 kinase confers photoprotection through signaling in the chloroplast unfolded protein response.

In response to proteotoxic stress, chloroplasts communicate with the nuclear gene expression system through a chloroplast unfolded protein response (cpUPR). We isolated Chlamydomonas reinhardtii mutants that disrupt cpUPR signaling and identified a gene encoding a previously uncharacterized cytoplasmic protein kinase, termed Mars1-for mutant affected in chloroplast-to-nucleus retrograde signaling-as the first known component in cpUPR signal transmission. Lack of cpUPR induction in MARS1 mutant cells impaired their ability to cope with chloroplast stress, including exposure to excessive light. Conversely, transgenic activation of cpUPR signaling conferred an advantage to cells undergoing photooxidative stress. Our results indicate that the cpUPR mitigates chloroplast photodamage and that manipulation of this pathway is a potential avenue for engineering photosynthetic organisms with increased tolerance to chloroplast stress.

Life on Earth crucially depends on photosynthesis, the process by which energy stored in sunlight is harnessed to convert carbon dioxide into sugars and oxygen. In plants and algae, photosynthesis occurs in specialized cellular compartments called chloroplasts. Inside chloroplasts, complex molecular machines absorb light and channel its energy into the appropriate chemical reactions. These machines are composed of proteins that need to be assembled and maintained. However, proteins can become damaged, and when this occurs, they must be recognized, removed, and replaced. When exposed to bright light, the photosynthetic machinery is pushed into overdrive and protein damage is accelerated. In response, the chloroplast sends an alarm signal to activate a protective system called the "chloroplast unfolded protein response", or cpUPR for short. The cpUPR leads to the production of specialized proteins that help protect and repair the chloroplast. It was not known how plants and algae evaluate the level of damaged proteins in the chloroplast, or which signals trigger the cpUPR. To address these questions, Perlaza et al. designed a method to identify the molecular components of the alarm signal. These experiments used specially engineered cells from the algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that fluoresced when the cpUPR was activated. Perlaza et al. mutagenized these cells ­ that is, damaged the cells' DNA to cause random changes in the genetic code. If a mutagenized cell no longer fluoresced in response to protein damage, it indicated that communication between protein damage and the cpUPR had been broken. In other words, the mutation had damaged a piece of DNA that encoded a protein critical for activating the cpUPR. These experiments identified one protein ­ which Perlaza et al. named Mars1 ­ as a crucial molecular player that is required to trigger the cpUPR. Algal cells with defective Mars1 were more vulnerable to chloroplast damage, including that caused by excessive light. These discoveries in algae will serve as a foundation for understanding the mechanism and significance of the cpUPR in land plants. Perlaza et al. also found that mild artificial activation of the cpUPR could preemptively guard cells against damaged chloroplast proteins. This suggests that the cpUPR could be harnessed in agriculture, for example, to help crop plants endure harsher climates.