Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 34(12): 5574-5582, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31938928

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may be complicated by postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting, with consequent increases in length of stay (LOS), decreased patient satisfaction, and higher costs. While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been in circulation for many years, there is no standard ERAS protocol for bariatric surgery. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively and compared to a historical control. All patients undergoing LSG, ages 18 to 75, were included in the pathway; those with preoperative chronic opioid use were excluded from our results. Statistical analysis was performed using t-statistics and chi-squared test. Ninety patients undergoing LSG, performed by a single surgeon, were included in our ERAS group from November 26, 2018, to April 30, 2019, and were compared to a historical control of 570 patients who underwent LSG over the previous 5 years (pre-ERAS). Measured outcomes included discharge opioid prescriptions issued, hospital length of stay, 30-day readmissions, reoperations, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Ten (11%) ERAS patients vs 100% of pre-ERAS patients received opioid prescriptions upon, or after, discharge (p < 0.001). The ERAS group LOS decreased to 1.36 days vs 2.40 days in the pre-ERAS group (p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rates were 0% for ERAS patients vs 3.09% for pre-ERAS patients (p = 0.149). 30-day reoperation rates were 0% for ERAS patients vs 0.54% for pre-ERAS patients (p = 1). Thirty-day morbidity rates were 3.33% (3) for ERAS patients vs 3.27% for pre-ERAS patients (p = 1); there was no 30-day mortality in either group. CONCLUSION: ERAS for LSG results in a clinical and statistically significant reduction in postoperative opioid use and LOS, without increasing 30-day readmissions, reoperations, morbidity, or mortality.


Assuntos
Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Pesquisa Interdisciplinar , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Alta do Paciente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 17(5): 885-8, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19396067

RESUMO

To update evidence-based best practice guidelines for obtaining informed consent from weight loss surgery (WLS) patients, with an emphasis on appropriate content and communications approaches that might enhance patient understanding of the information, we performed a systematic search of English-language literature published between April 2004 and May 2007 in MEDLINE and the Cochrane database. Keywords included WLS and informed consent, comprehension, health literacy, and patient education; and WLS and outcomes, risk, patient safety management, and effectiveness. Recommendations are based on the most current literature and the consensus of the expert panel; they were graded according to systems used in established evidence-based models. We identified over 120 titles, 38 of which were reviewed in detail. Evidence suggests that WLS outcomes, including long-term rates of relapse, vary by procedure. For some weight loss surgeries, long-term outcomes may not be known. Risks also vary by patient and provider characteristics. Informed consent should incorporate realistic projections of the short- and long-term risks, benefits, and consequences of surgery, as well as alternatives to WLS. For consent to be informed, the education process should continue until the patient demonstrates comprehension of all relevant material and concepts. Confirmation of comprehension can protect patients engaged in the process of consent for WLS. Future research should focus on the outcomes and consequences of WLS, and different approaches that facilitate patient understanding of, and decision making about, WLS.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/psicologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Humanos , Obesidade/psicologia , Obesidade/cirurgia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 17(5): 895-900, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19396069

RESUMO

The objective of this study is to update evidence-based best practice guidelines for nursing in weight loss surgery (WLS). We performed a systematic search of English-language literature on WLS and perioperative nursing, postoperative, anesthesia, and discharge published between April 2004 and May 2007 in MEDLINE, CINHAL and the Cochrane Library. Key words were used to narrow the search for a selective review of abstracts, retrieval of full articles, and grading of evidence according to systems used in established evidence-based models. From these, we developed evidence-based best practice recommendations from the most recent literature on nursing in WLS. We identified >54 papers; the most relevant were reviewed in detail. Regular updates of evidence-based recommendations for best practices in WLS nursing are required to address advances in surgery and anesthesiology, as well as changes in the demographics and levels of obesity in WLS patients. Key factors in patient safety include staff education, comprehensive admission assessment, patient education, careful preoperative surveillance and postoperative care, and long-term discharge follow-up.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/enfermagem , Cuidados de Enfermagem/normas , Anestesiologia/normas , Cirurgia Bariátrica/psicologia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estado Nutricional , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/enfermagem , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/normas , Psicologia , Segurança
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa