RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tobacco use remains a leading cause of death in the U.S. Varenicline is a preferred medication for tobacco cessation, and a prior report in the literature showed its use fell dramatically after the voluntary recall of Chantix (brand) varenicline (name) in July 2021. OBJECTIVES: Working with data on prescriptions for varenicline and nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT), we studied use from 2018 to 2023 to determine if varenicline use had recovered or if there had been a compensatory increase in NRT use. METHODS: Data are yearly from state employees and their dependents who were ≥18 years of age and were health-insurance beneficiaries of the Washington Public Employees Benefits Board from July 2018 through June 2023. Data include numbers of tobacco users and numbers of prescriptions filled. RESULTS: The 5-year prevalence of tobacco use among 224,816 beneficiaries was 4.6%. The percentage of tobacco users who filled a prescription for varenicline fell from highs of 9.5% and 9.6% in the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 years to lows of 5.3% and 6.4% in the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 years. For nicotine replacement therapy, prescriptions rose modestly over the 5 years, from 4.5% in 2018-2019% to 6.0% in 2022-2023. DISCUSSION: Varenicline use dropped after the voluntary recall of Chantix by Pfizer in mid-2021 and has not returned to prerecall levels. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists and other clinicians should address this drop, in addition to addressing longer-term challenges to increasing varenicline use; these include the requirement for a prescription and the black-box warning by the Food and Drug Administration, rescinded in 2016.
Assuntos
Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Vareniclina , Vareniclina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Abandono do Uso de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Agentes de Cessação do Hábito de Fumar/uso terapêutico , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Masculino , Washington/epidemiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
HPV vaccination rates remain far below goal, leaving many adolescents unprotected against future HPV-related cancers. Starting HPV vaccine at age 9 may improve timely preteen vaccination. The "HPV Vax at 9" Quality Improvement intervention paired HPV vaccination with 9- and 10-year well child visits and was piloted at two pediatric clinics (n = 9 sites) in Washington between 2018 and 2022. Supporting interventions included standardized immunization schedule posters in exam rooms, electronic medical record supports, provider and staff training, strong provider recommendations, printed educational resources, and peer-to-peer champion coaching. Provider and clinic acceptance was high with HPV vaccine administration occurring at 68-86% of the 9- and 10-year well child visits. During the first year, HPV initiation rates at age 9-10 increased by 30% or more at each clinic. Sustained improvements in initiation and series completion were seen with completion at age 11-12 rising as much as 40% from 22 to 62%. Downward pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic on HPV vaccination rates was mitigated. Pairing HPV vaccine with 9- and 10-year well child visits, posting the standardized immunization schedule, and instituting EMR supports for HPV at 9 may be effective and sustainable strategies to simplify clinic workflows and increase timely HPV vaccination.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Pandemias , VacinaçãoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to explore tobacco-related knowledge and perceptions at Washington State (WA) agencies. METHODS: The study used a cross-sectional employee survey and qualitative focus groups with managers/supervisors. We produced descriptive statistics to examine differences in awareness and perceptions of tobacco-control efforts among employees and conducted a rapid thematic analysis of focus group data. RESULTS: Of employees, only 18% with a history of tobacco use had used their agency's cessation benefits. Employees who did not use tobacco and who had higher education had more favorable attitudes toward tobacco-control efforts. In the focus groups, manager/supervisors described limited tobacco cessation promotion at their agency, barriers to tobacco control implementation, and concerns about the perceived effectiveness of additional tobacco-control efforts. CONCLUSIONS: State agencies should increase promotion of tobacco control policies and programs to increase awareness and reduce disparities in tobacco use.