Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 15(5): 457-65, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20421264

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Most guidelines for hormone receptor (HR)-positive early breast cancer recommend addition of adjuvant chemotherapy for most women, leading to overtreatment, which causes considerable morbidity and cost. There has been recent incorporation of gene expression analysis in aiding decision making. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of recurrence score (RS)-guided treatment using 21-gene assay as compared with treatment guided by the Adjuvant! Online program (AOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of treatment guided either by 21-gene assay or by AOL in a 50-year-old woman with lymph node-negative HR-positive breast cancer over a lifetime horizon. We assumed that women classified to be at high risk all received chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen and those classified to be at low risk received tamoxifen only. The model took a health care payer's perspective with results reported in 2008 Canadian dollars ($). Event rates, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. Both costs and benefits were discounted at 5%. Outcome measures were life years gained, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: For a 50-year-old woman, RS-guided treatment was associated with an incremental lifetime cost of $4,102 and a gain in 0.065 QALY, with an ICER of $63,064 per QALY compared with AOL-guided treatment. ICER increased with increasing cost of 21-gene assay and increasing age of patients. Results were most sensitive to probabilities relating to risk categorization and recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: The 21-gene assay appears cost-effective from a Canadian health care perspective.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Genes Neoplásicos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Canadá , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética
2.
Oncologist ; 15(5): 447-56, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20421266

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A major challenge in treating early-stage hormone receptor (HR)(+) breast cancer is selecting women who, after initial surgery, do not require chemotherapy. Better prognostic and predictive tests are needed. The 21-gene assay is the only widely commercially available gene signature that can be performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature supporting the prognostic and predictive ability of the 21-gene assay in HR(+) node-negative and node-positive breast cancer patients in chemotherapy-/endocrine-treated and untreated populations. We considered: (a) How accurate is the recurrence score (RS) as a prognostic factor for distant recurrence? (b) How accurate is the RS as a predictive factor for benefit from systemic therapy? (c) How does the RS compare with other prognostic/predictive factors such as tumor size, tumor grade, patient age, and integrated decision aids such as Adjuvant! Online? (d) How do patients and physicians view the 21-gene assay? (e) What are the cost implications of the 21-gene assay? RESULTS: The 21-gene assay: (a) provided accurate risk information; (b) predicted response to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil and to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy; (c) added additional information to traditional biomarkers; (d) was viewed positively by both physicians and patients; and (e) fell within the cost-effectiveness values in North America. CONCLUSION: This assay may be offered to patients with node-negative HR(+) breast cancer to assist in adjuvant treatment decisions. Data are accumulating to support the use of the 21-gene assay in HR(+) node-positive patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Genes Neoplásicos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Seleção de Pacientes , Prognóstico , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/economia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Case Rep Oncol ; 5(3): 524-9, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23139666

RESUMO

Malignancy is a common cause of disseminated intravascular coagulation and usually presents as a chronic disorder in solid organ tumours. We present a rare case of recurrent acute disseminated intravascular coagulation in neuroendocrine carcinoma after manipulation, firstly, by core biopsy and, later, by cytotoxic therapy causing a release of procoagulants and cytokines from lysed tumour cells. This is reminiscent of tumour lysis syndrome where massive quantities of intracellular electrolytes and nucleic acid are released, causing acute metabolic imbalance and renal failure. This case highlights the potential complication of acute disseminated intravascular coagulation after trauma to malignant cells.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa