RESUMO
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is an important methodology to understand risky behaviour and holds promise for HIV research. EMA is still novel in sub-Saharan Africa. We describe challenges and lessons learned on a novel study implementing mobile phone EMAs with adolescent boys in South Africa. The Tsamaisano study was a longitudinal study from 2020-2023 to recruit adolescent boys aged 15-19 years; including those without HIV and those perinatally infected and living with HIV. Participants were prompted to complete 52 weekly mobile phone survey on emotional state, exposure to and perpetration of violence, and sexual risk behaviour. Surveys were delivered using a random algorithm to choose the day. We incorporated mechanisms to assess challenges and optimize survey completion: weekly team meetings with youth representation and real-time data monitoring. Additionally, 20 frequent vs infrequent survey submitters participated in qualitative interviews about barriers and recommendations. Real-time monitoring indicated low (defined as <50%) survey completion in the first months of study implementation. To ensure that both the adolescent participant and their caregiver understood the commitment required for successful EMA, we created and implemented a guided discussion around mobile phone access during the enrolment visit. We identified a need for increased and ongoing technical support; addressed by creating technical guides, implementing a standard two-week check-in call after enrolment, adding an automated request button for call-back assistance, creating a WhatsApp messaging stream, and reaching out to all participants failing to submit two sequential surveys. Entry-level smartphones, including those initially distributed by the study, did not have capacity for certain updates and had to be replaced with more expensive models. Participants struggled with randomly allocated survey days; completion improved with set completion days and targeted reminder messages. Together, these steps improved survey completion from 40% in December 2020 to 65% in April 2022. We describe key lessons learned to inform future study designs with mobile phone EMAs, drawing on our experience implementing such among adolescent boys, including persons living with HIV, in a low-and-middle income setting. The key lessons learned through the Tsamaisano study are important to inform future study designs with EMA utilizing mobile phone, electronic data collection among adolescent boys in low-and-middle-income settings.
RESUMO
Background: The Road to Health Application (RTHA) is essentially a digitalized version of the National Department of Health's Road to Health book, and a hand-printed booklet given to mothers at the birth of each baby. The RTHA, like the booklet, provides guidelines for maternal and child health outcomes, with the goal of creating a database of children and caregivers in South Africa and teaching them how to raise a healthy child. This paper explored potential barriers and enablers to using the RTHA in the South African context based on user experiences. Methods: Using a qualitative design, we conducted 50 serial interviews (two separate interviews, 1 month apart). Through convenience, sampling eligible participants were 18 years or older women who were pregnant and/or had a child under the age of 5 years. Participants included 25 existing users and 25 new users of the RTHA, who owned android smart phones at enrollment. Existing users were recruited telephonically through the National Department of Health database, and new users were approached at the antenatal care unit and wellness baby clinic (women with children under 5 years) at the Chris Hani Baragwaneth Academic Hospital. Upon enrollment, participants completed a brief survey on sociodemographics and mobile phone use, and thereafter, they had a baseline interview followed by a telephonic interview 1 month later. A semistructured interview guide was used to explore barriers, enablers, and the usability of the RTHA. Using thematic data analysis, we identified enablers and barriers to the use of the RTHA. Results: A third (33%) of all participants reported IsiZulu as their main language of communication, and 6% of the participants reported English as their main language of communication. The RTHA was an important addition to the booklet that helped keep new mothers informed about child immunization and provided important information about healthy child rearing practices. However, multiple barriers were cited to using the RTHA; these included the fact that the app was only available in two languages, high data costs, lack of access to smart phones, and app functionalities. The enablers to using the RTHA included the accessibility of important information regarding prenatal and postnatal childcare. Conclusion: This study gives insight into the barriers and enablers from the end-user perspective to improve the RTHA for future use in South Africa and offers guidance on how to improve the RTHA to be more user-friendly, which could increase its usability among mothers. It further emphasizes the need to consider the challenges experienced by users in South Africa when developing future mobile health interventions to increase uptake.